From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:28:47 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#36616 <36616@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#36616 <36616@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed Reply-To: bug#36616 <36616@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:28:47 +0000 retitle 36616 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed reassign 36616 emacs submitter 36616 Lars Ingebrigtsen severity 36616 wishlist tag 36616 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 10:11:40 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 14:11:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40434 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwGy-0007LN-JK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:11:40 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43135) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwGw-0007LF-7t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:11:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwGv-00076B-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:11:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwGu-00018J-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:11:37 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwGu-00017m-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:11:36 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwGq-0006iy-KN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:34 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:32 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) When saying "make test" you get this: --- SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ----------------------- Files examined: 240 Ran 3255 tests, 3210 results as expected, 45 skipped --- After getting out my slide rule I see that that all adds up, but perhaps this should say explicitly "0 failed"? Since that's what we're interested in. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 10:50:16 2019 Received: (at 36616) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 14:50:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40507 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwsJ-00025J-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:50:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37975) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwsI-000253-T4 for 36616@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:50:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwsD-0006Xm-LA; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:50:09 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1373 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwsA-0000NZ-0G; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:50:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:49:35 +0300 Message-Id: <83ef2v2tq8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:32 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#36616: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36616 Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:11:32 +0200 > > SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS > ----------------------- > Files examined: 240 > Ran 3255 tests, 3210 results as expected, 45 skipped > > --- > > After getting out my slide rule I see that that all adds up, but perhaps > this should say explicitly "0 failed"? Since that's what we're > interested in. I'm not sure, because there can be expected failures as well. Maybe "0 unexpected results"? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 10:58:11 2019 Received: (at 36616) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 14:58:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwzz-0002HC-5F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:58:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwzw-0002H2-HP for 36616@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:58:09 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlwzs-00073x-Ep; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:58:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#36616: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed References: <83ef2v2tq8.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEX+/gfj2Qr//whAOgT/ /wkKSUWSAAACfklEQVQ4jU2U2xmkIAyFI04BXCwgRAogxgIU6b+mPXFm91teUH5zOwmStFvnfLY5 47xPPGkqPfNCInPdHNzbHMAWRKK2F+DDJ0vbZORZVeaQNF4gOvcc7kMktP0AGHIt1GSytj3TcjCF zx7DnLMhRmtCRfbIoWSisMbPnMMBPFKhPVKolimUSENEAIawA5xJNbegazQRDy5shHesPYubSruQ 1RQi5dX9cz3G2olFylbJzfByUCKpGc8BwMaN4Aw/9WBlhisxmIqKg1sFADlLIeFVufbPrJTMs1wO WjX1EIjMrDeAYhvyQeKmCaUXpRTFgZlGB9ViyYFMySAaggNYCIjSZe0cfuBrYZ0kAEDyqv0Lbsqs pgzVOuqT2h1wa5fXYQZ1ag9lk/0FCO5AiqEwaGsiazzFTplfsH5BACghih3TgbQBEGRRnIrJEux8 wQxcLIqntOZmvGQ7m4PBYiiEAPZ8Q6i/gARqoVkAz1EBjp8rL1C9yX3U/uDt/A9g2qQe7dLnnLdC Xvu8IAnAfrRm6waXDqC4p8TUJmMsrpKZ0wsu2jAmkBCJ4SR9oF+BD7g6hDmEvWTxL9UFwobgBwdm SUvGBEwpudrP1QlHIvrk5hfgPssLFACDxU2fo+FiydRiHVEMYMCinmiSDgArhvLMIh0+3Pt56YRF m6Vgg0n0GDKebejXVSku4YMxQOelrdsoTdHgATC/4BQeoyDRD6R8XbWvK4zOGNZwoQFme4NfHryH EaalVE7/9E33Wj1dTSn5INvp6dz9X4Hv1j+QW1vjEpe/krx7D3Sp+1Pvw1fE1xTzfnkffPBxAnzR dy3pt+Jvv35oWRbcTkIevvBzmH8AXd+kTBu5Ba4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:58:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83ef2v2tq8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:49:35 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not sure, because there can be expected failures as well. > Maybe "0 unexpected results"? Hm... But aren't expected failures successes? :-) Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36616 Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not sure, because there can be expected failures as well. > Maybe "0 unexpected results"? Hm... But aren't expected failures successes? :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 14:13:26 2019 Received: (at 36616) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 18:13:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02w-0000wp-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02u-0000wc-6c for 36616@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02p-0005n7-2M; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:19 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1820 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02m-0006DM-6B; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:13:08 +0300 Message-Id: <838st32kaz.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:58:04 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#36616: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed References: <83ef2v2tq8.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36616 Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:58:04 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I'm not sure, because there can be expected failures as well. > > Maybe "0 unexpected results"? > > Hm... But aren't expected failures successes? :-) No, they are failures. But expected. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 19:56:23 2019 Received: (at 36616) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 23:56:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm5Op-0005a9-Fj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:56:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:51542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm5Oo-0005a0-4a for 36616@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:56:22 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hm5Ok-0003DG-6E; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:56:20 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#36616: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed References: <83ef2v2tq8.fsf@gnu.org> <838st32kaz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:56:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838st32kaz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:13:08 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I've now made it output the data on unexpected results (and skipped) unconditionally. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36616 Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I've now made it output the data on unexpected results (and skipped) unconditionally. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 19:56:29 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 23:56:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40965 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm5Ou-0005aT-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:56:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:51556) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm5Ot-0005aL-0d for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:56:27 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hm5Oq-0003DN-Dq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:56:26 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:56:24 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #36616 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 36616 fixed close 36616 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 36616 fixed close 36616 27.1 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:28:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator