GNU bug report logs - #36614
rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>

Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:43:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #13 received at 36614-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: 36614-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ivan Petkov <ivanppetkov <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#36614: rust <at> 1.36's hash is incorrect.
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:16:20 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre, Ivan,

Pierre Langlois wrote:
> From 
> https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz...
> downloading from 
> https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz...
>  rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz  147.5MiB 
>  1.6MiB/s 01:35 [##################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for 
> /gnu/store/jm9xvf6qy4zxkb7rkmpz8ygf55l8v8v5-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz:
>   expected hash: 
>   18r688ih4xi9m8gv55g1amb8inrwkdxp5fbcqb6i4gqxi90l3i0m
>   actual hash: 
>   06xv2p6zq03lidr0yaf029ii8wnjjqa894nkmrm6s0rx47by9i04

I get that too.

> Hopefully it's not unstable :-/.

Since release archives are signed that would imply some horrible 
things about their key management, so I doubt it very much.  I 
guess we'll find out.

I've gone ahead and pushed a fix since the signature checked out. 
I'm closing this bug for now...

However, I'd be interested to know what the previous hash 
described.  Do you still have that file around, Ivan?

Thanks,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 311 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.