From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 10 06:57:13 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2019 10:57:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAHh-0003jT-Dh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:57:13 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48683) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAHf-0003jM-Mw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:57:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAHe-0006q7-Fj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:57:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAHd-0007jm-86 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:57:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:36526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAHc-0007id-R0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:57:09 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD04D1A3E93 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1562756226; bh=5dnCoEGmUsXHQs5JfnMg0AY6PSqdNV6w1QwsVrTDgbE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=sZIQhsrEGREGWUb3+cf3QxUBtjqbLvxVmibjSqVQ70tsYOb0+WSIcZ4XsjcLfP/vo tkKUs7BDHiyoFCz6XzYX06VcvmJq9oMB0jKI2SmiHM4GNAABJ7I3/T45Hh/q66VV91 i7+mfVGRp0tuckksAbobD0ZINf3xpwegEashxEWg= X-Riseup-User-ID: CA08D185E3702993EE93E8838ED70DB8F917D04254D78ED4964E1EDC135F06C9 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31A91223605 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 885fc5d1 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:57:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Meiyo Peng To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: The installer recommends wrong initrd module names Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:57:03 +0800 Message-ID: <87wogqxim8.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 198.252.153.129 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hi, When I install Guix on a low end computer using the `guix system init` command, the installer says that "mmc_block" and "sdhci_acpi" should be added into initrd-modules: #+begin_example error: you may need these modules in the initrd for /dev/mmcblk0p2: mmc_block sdhci_acpi hint: Try adding them to the `initrd-modules' field of your `operating-system' declaration, along these lines: (operating-system ;; ... (initrd-modules (append (list "mmc_block" "sdhci_acpi") %base-initrd-modules))) #+end_example This computer has an eMMC disk, so this sounds reasonable. I made that modification and the installation process succeeded. But when I boot the computer, it complained that "sdhci_acpi" could not be found. After spending hours digging around, I finally found out that the required module name is actuall called "sdhci-acpi" rather than "sdhci_acpi". The computer can successfully boot into Guix when I replace "sdhci_acpi" with "sdhci-acpi" and reinstall Guix. So the problem is that the Guix installer recommends wrong initrd module names to user. -- Meiyo Peng https://www.pengmeiyu.com/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 10 07:15:58 2019 Received: (at 36574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2019 11:15:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34899 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAZq-0004Bo-2Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:15:58 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:60012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAZl-0004Bb-0N for 36574@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:15:55 -0400 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 683f2492 for <36574@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=0ZrgnF7S6GmxxR9B8IgJ3u 7mnKDOWryhCPjJ672wkoM=; b=VqsgCfuPTmpWOyK+9a2tQioQ6epY9FAcrLOdFF g+rtMKwGDXDAB6Rw9Vx/qneeuAWrakRUwIGZp7vhJnwKn11n6ppeB9KmJt5e2NMA A5jxmfSTDN2+/A9Cp/1JRaTAyKHw6g/jSbhlElBJ4szbyJ3Io6kb9RaqYTsprw3f VKjUD8B4IqKMKX4i0molrDieuzaJr0ebj6WEJXB6Zi7hncfQ6AqLPD913MXBA/WW P6CV7eBJ67wKJntz7nFsfF+FVG8bfrHcZqmYDWPIlAQ9xjtkmHwIXvwnfxiNWfUL iB/ATAjm1fcwfleSz2HGLhecj1XUssVj2j3kscyInFD0ukug== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 75a7d9c4 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <36574@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: 36574@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#36574: The installer recommends wrong initrd module names References: <87wogqxim8.fsf@riseup.net> In-reply-to: <87wogqxim8.fsf@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:15:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhlmywbf.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36574 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Hullo, Meiyo Peng wrote: > So the problem is that the Guix installer recommends wrong > initrd module > names to user. Do you think this is the revenge of [0]? If so, could you merge the two? Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34902 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXSXI5AAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eemnAQCGqJ+pEiY2CsH2lVLsMWfeb2AA0lY//+PwjZvZeVu19wD/bUZaaQfNQfhA CVyFc3pvvmL/r3jXYrgLt79K5sGLDAI= =iErg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 10 21:46:39 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2019 01:46:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlOAR-0000RZ-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:46:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:40492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlOAQ-0000RR-Cc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:46:38 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6881A0249 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1562809597; bh=C/NPAZtqcSE6rELl7dK0ulEpP9wjqB1KyB3R4mXFsIY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=fd4wfYfoOAjkpLe/WWXToq4WXqE8joVNAkHvyLPKLQTysPT6EJueeWktcAeNU3dMI dC1MWVy3IHrImAWetMAt1Pir1ZAXJ0WcqVsrXggQRu1yqxFTgjVpuSJS/sKqF//HeP WQUA5DIHGUsHUvmDtzn8ll40mrhPAZuvZJP/TO1E= X-Riseup-User-ID: D940E594A78130DA42E7289C8DFA70764397E78AF553EF0BFB8D5393F61C5D61 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B9F9222A3B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 846d9057 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:46:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Meiyo Peng To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #36574 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:46:34 +0800 Message-ID: <87v9w9xs05.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) merge 36574 34902 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 10 21:51:20 2019 Received: (at 36574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2019 01:51:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlOEy-0000YY-9s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:51:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:41432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlOEx-0000YQ-3g for 36574@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:51:19 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BDD1A1049; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:51:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1562809878; bh=gNAwEhc4bQj7M+/tatjnIs16XOwqsFAiKrKcNlCANqc=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:From; b=r34UUbMJ44xGxJck86UTlKvYyVXeFKSrgSoBgxaKN/iZ4nkDSVy3SkVwZv9IxreCC Plg/eCldn7LJ/lBTTiA8uuj1iPu3nEYFBGVDzzOPtaz75S42unPuGjLn2wrhSPPHQ6 UVtyZVdLaUEDwNkmP55O+S9J9ZQTtYsdnkzTDoQY= X-Riseup-User-ID: B181649E1D876911028AEA62E9EA0939DB139C84AB5DA001DD20DCB40CFB0501 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7C522220B0; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id f3a4941d; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:51:15 +0000 (UTC) References: <87wogqxim8.fsf@riseup.net> <87zhlmywbf.fsf@nckx> From: Meiyo Peng To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#36574: The installer recommends wrong initrd module names In-reply-to: <87zhlmywbf.fsf@nckx> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:51:15 +0800 Message-ID: <87tvbtxrsc.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36574 Cc: 36574@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hello, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Do you think this is the revenge of [0]? Yes, I think so. > If so, could you merge the two? Done. Thanks. > [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34902 -- Meiyo Peng https://www.pengmeiyu.com/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 31 17:04:48 2019 Received: (at 36574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2019 21:04:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsvmB-00047m-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:04:48 -0400 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:24332) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsvmA-00047W-7w for 36574@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:04:47 -0400 Received: from w2.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.163]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA09FBF287 for <36574@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:04:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1564607080; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=1gheoYQ1V2O8bSGSSprv4SbISixgI7b431Add/VOAHU=; b=WLqKM7946Lg6ub1mUxs0G1t59WmTV6DkPK+ZYsTOD7RunEiVhbp5h8Z0qSeBT3U1 F546jLVsbbE7Cuql47/+bcZQUtpR9IwzhoGkuAUGvHkT0utr6KVdiu/MzSD6j414808 IEX15p0QOAkIigKz5H3owA4dcL03MhOxIQM4Pdb8LJ4izB8lnjCgWlMyWRikwdsBtYn Y3KwxgEZDT9svb/U246TbZL7KTnwiqOcoJp+bsMMkdsQJ6yUpV0B37rjTAY6wmZ1CBb 3tHzlt8UtSq8jBOU1UwMuPSx7WO/Ox8+YUpJK0SGyipU5Fj8bz3LsSvbvPN253ymK59 c3dwsSEunQ== Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:04:40 +0200 (CEST) From: To: <36574@debbugs.gnu.org> Message-ID: Subject: The installer recommends wrong initrd module names MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_74332_707584232.1564607080177" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36574 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) ------=_Part_74332_707584232.1564607080177 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have this problem too ------=_Part_74332_707584232.1564607080177 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have this problem too
------=_Part_74332_707584232.1564607080177-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 16 17:05:07 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2019 21:05:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPG-0004uV-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPF-0004tt-Oo for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPA-0004KU-Mf for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:00 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50864 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPA-00076k-53 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 23:04:58 +0200 Message-Id: <87ftm0g6th.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #34902 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) retitle 34902 Kernel module not found at boot time due to hyphen/underscore mismatch quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 16 17:05:17 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2019 21:05:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPR-0004v4-4C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPO-0004uf-LL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPJ-0004OV-JW for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:09 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50866 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hyjPI-00077b-45 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:05:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 23:05:06 +0200 Message-Id: <87ef1kg6t9.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #34902 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) severity 34902 important quit From unknown Wed Aug 20 00:02:40 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator