From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Add comment when closing bugs to show it was not by accident Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15626729706584 (code B ref -1); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:50:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 11:49:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkock-0001i8-82 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:49:30 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkoch-0001i0-SK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:49:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkocf-00035O-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:49:27 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkocd-0000lW-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:49:25 -0400 Received: from dragonfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.51]:52282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkoca-0000je-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:49:22 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989972C0A5F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-92-193.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.92.193]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 04A7B2C1BA0 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:49:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:49:17 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Cure-Plucky: 3301f40d023742a5_1562672957423_1707200287 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1562672957422:3549250704 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1562672957422 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA40483BE3 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 04:49:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=NQy0Fjm8eC9J2xpOg00kl1v9+wg=; b=peTYFahjkyD9QvhX +w05ln5LEg29tap8sq1svdsO5uGFuiUjCvVTtWe+XhuPOQf7199+WBFCiqbpF7I0 kGFg3Obj9Z24kowU1mRbzlfDSJLuOLdWV668AzUuAsOoY/AZGt6rlDIIDeNioPyS B4mr12q4Ze7ViOhVNBPn97uhT5o= Received: from jidanni.org (111-246-99-103.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [111.246.99.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17D1283BDF for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 04:49:11 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a27 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:49:07 +0800 Message-ID: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgedvgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfggtgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnjjnnjcuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppeeruhhtfhdqkeerueerheeimhfphefnihehhegsveekreepucffrghnucflrggtohgsshhonhcuoehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgpdhnrhgtphhtthhopegsuhhgqdhgnhhuqdgvmhgrtghssehgnhhurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 23.83.209.51 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) I see bugs are now just closed without comment these days. http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34307 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34311 If a comment is added, we can tell if they were closed by accident or not. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> In-Reply-To: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.15626737798288 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 12:02:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkopn-00029c-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:02:59 -0400 Received: from caracal.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.30]:32867) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkopl-00029T-3i for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:02:58 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBFB502B80 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-11-45.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.11.45]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6C86B500D90 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:02:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:02:55 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Spill-Tangy: 7ea79f621ab7a884_1562673775530_1401461974 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1562673775530:3478828126 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1562673775529 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DD8832F9 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:02:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=oOwvB1kUZiygzrZcZiqgCuLqQ0k=; b=mNA5UJIhHTHaBoxz iIfTS7Sm8ACqKM2lwKZepQp29s2d8IAOgAFsIuaf00m4MtBWxk02PFIoT7eqz8tR qdUT6qL57awvn7JHM/CKiWmIH/TahBbP8gLBEa3ttfMSuio+NX7yW7eaQR6zLVlZ nDxmgPeUX8FBWsTHQdZq427QtzU= Received: from jidanni.org (111-246-99-103.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [111.246.99.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A44D832FD for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:02:51 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a80 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 20:02:47 +0800 Message-ID: <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgedvgdehtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfggtgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnjjnnjcuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppeeruhhtfhdqkeerueerheeimhfphefnihehhegsveekreepucffrghnucflrggtohgsshhonhcuoehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgpdhnrhgtphhtthhopeefieehiedtseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.15626739838617 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 12:06:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60400 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkot5-0002Eu-0f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:06:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkot3-0002Ek-78 for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:06:21 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkosu-00052P-HF; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:06:18 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:06:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2019 20:02:47 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson writes: > Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report. The bugs in question were already marked as "wontfix". Closing. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report. The bugs in question were already marked as "wontfix". Closing. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 09 08:06:26 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 12:06:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkot8-0002FA-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:06:26 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkot7-0002F3-0I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:06:25 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkot4-00052W-G1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:06:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:06:22 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #36560 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 36560 notabug close 36560 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 36560 notabug close 36560 quit From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Add comment when closing bugs to show it was not by accident Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 36560-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D36560.156268492622827 (code D ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 36560-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 15:08:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrja-0005w7-2R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:08:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrjX-0005vu-Km for 36560-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:08:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrjM-0007K5-7Y; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:08:34 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4079 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrjK-0001So-6k; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:08:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:08:15 +0300 Message-Id: <83pnmj5jq8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > > Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:49:07 +0800 > > I see bugs are now just closed without comment these days. > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34307 > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34311 > If a comment is added, we can tell if they were closed by accident or not. They were both tagged "wontfix", which explains the reason nicely, I think. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156268508123073 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 15:11:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrm4-000604-TH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:11:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrm2-0005zr-Q6 for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:11:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrlp-0000T8-Ui; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:11:09 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4232 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrlk-0001g2-95; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:11:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:10:46 +0300 Message-Id: <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > > Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 20:02:47 +0800 > > Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report. Of course, it is. You can see in the bug Web page that the request to tag the bug was from a person, not from am machine. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report In-Reply-To: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156268540729714 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 15:16:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrrK-0007iy-S6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:16:47 -0400 Received: from eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.55]:35379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkrrI-0007g2-SM for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:16:45 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5216850277D; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-11-45.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.11.45]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 073085025D9; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:16:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:16:43 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Tasty-Turn: 1850435815d0dfd1_1562685403125_2454187945 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1562685403125:1052007567 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1562685403125 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67AF83764; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=Hm1/5Ms22hImfZkdZnHxJRepkDA=; b=eYr8HLWQcKlCd XppBEBWVSxw8YHiG2dbCiK+Ys6FCiy0iePuJ0mamFqyW6/nQYqzDZ9MJbLIe+Cjw fII4RgTDaGu1b/mjVbIemX6uCbJtqhcE/Dkh/pCuReNAc0G2Vx/YgoCmY/Gbtbzw SXSv6tw8nj4MFJC5G2+NWp2wrpJmdE= Received: from jidanni.org (111-246-99-103.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [111.246.99.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2353883752; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:16:37 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a18 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:16:34 +0800 Message-ID: <87pnmjtezx.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgedvgdeltdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufhffkfggtgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnjjnnjcuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppeeruhhtfhdqkeerueerheeimhfphefnihehhegsveekreepucffrghnucflrggtohgsshhonhcuoehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgpdhnrhgtphhtthhopeefieehiedtseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I'm saying one could use the bts(1) command and fire off the same wontfix + close commands to a long list of bug numbers. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:31:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.15626862564027 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:31:03 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 15:30:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hks52-00012e-BM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:30:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33339) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hks4z-0000vC-9i for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:30:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hks4t-000345-LK; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:30:47 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1466 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hks4s-0002x0-UE; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:30:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:30:33 +0300 Message-Id: <83d0ij5ip2.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87pnmjtezx.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson on Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:16:34 +0800) References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnmjtezx.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:16:34 +0800 > > I'm saying one could use the bts(1) command and fire off the same > wontfix + close commands to a long list of bug numbers. Why would you assume we do such nasty things? From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report In-Reply-To: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.15626862946052 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 15:31:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hks5e-0001ZK-A3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:31:34 -0400 Received: from dragonfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.51]:6874) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hks5b-0001Wf-U2 for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:31:32 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6FD5033CE; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-14-11.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.14.11]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70ABC503382; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:31:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:31:30 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Battle-Oafish: 2e1c60a4077bad4d_1562686290570_713935534 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1562686290570:530983956 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1562686290570 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C568376A; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:31:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=pXfSTBda2ZerTv9OlwxjZVu/hbU=; b=ZoGTXu/Sa1o1V ljmHgHI/swy97h4GollvCdPrpdcx3fvbJgmXLcJvlDBUZLEX6A+dB6WgknHhjVuo QMDtAYeDvRjvHJrdV3/VUokivQst9a10gKvNx2lQiRdH4f2Y5vZP3BNKwLw2NJpk p6v+B86Tuq2vNyq6cWO3vxVTBLLL2g= Received: from jidanni.org (111-246-99-103.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [111.246.99.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48D6B83765; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a18 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:31:23 +0800 Message-ID: <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgedvgdelfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufhffkfggtgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnjjnnjcuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddurddvgeeirdelledruddtfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppeeruhhtfhdqkeerueerheeimhfphefnihehhegsveekreepucffrghnucflrggtohgsshhonhcuoehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgpdhnrhgtphhtthhopeefieehiedtseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Also on Debian, the user doesn't have to check the web to find out why a bug was closed. Here he just gets a message that it was closed. From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 36560@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156268729919190 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 15:48:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hksLr-0004zS-96 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:48:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:48392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hksLp-0004zK-ER for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:48:17 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hksLk-0006kt-En; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:48:14 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEVbSk4WCQ00IykkFhtF MjcvCCv0AAACPklEQVQ4jW1U0ZUjMQhzJjTg+ArIYhowTAE+L/3XdJJ9ebcf532bZCxAIJGU8v8j 5VEt8VZK5tyvPMsI5OR9Ucu/twwhMJOAdFcewkid5dnm/nSF8/bULzLL5WUlLq5Q3Sw8KbhQQVUU BWN+OuLHy1N1IfRwEpNUA0csVwPZnJJ/W0bRLM96gxSRuD5tSJrNDSy1a9/maQrxmOBZX0tTzmxM FDQ9d0ZLTds6bP5lxkHKc4BkQ+sIwoQNRH3Z0nUflVbs+5OBWmpGSltQbHfAOWpbCp3QQgYE++hy AVAA3lEwzqxo7XCkUhfrEXrM4UTgAIDortHCD7Osf4BHjIZKbzInVD3AAlBr9E0tQgkelZqwVB1x LIRsUwn8AoCuGrnpCQwoH4ATNpp7/J7yA1AAjjbFSsKrH0C47QV5Y8Q0Atahh3o4LqbIxN8i0Kz7 Soz9hqswviyIvQHI0Vd4oLgxvHRUBoA63rWDQghgOK5qebyQ6ZjZOeVZaiaUB52AsNpvIBAJwiWB 5zecsPC73wwGDzMhpTgEz94sbiQI9zNXRwf4XsDn3mCr7ZmX0ybBtt+AQF19cbsQ+GZj5Ur9AoAx /PTkUOZSx38MDx3aOpc8v1BSeo9yYa/cgbaBjaT13LoI7O6IqAGD3+gE+Z6IB/CoQbthMNxOALcg cgOvPiqW7r3NiJZXbWMDzRE/XuNGE5ASq1lHI1CdW3l+Hva2ld/1ADxOnfDdKcKnUT8AbP0OTG7y vR8/GVypL8S1pnjY0B/uuJ4Lq2IKKgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:48:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2019 23:31:23 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson writes: > Also on Debian, the user doesn't have to check the web to find out why a > bug was closed. Here he just gets a message that it was closed. Sure: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > Also on Debian, the user doesn't have to check the web to find out why a > bug was closed. Here he just gets a message that it was closed. Sure: M-: (gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group 36560) :-) --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156269088917532 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 16:48:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hktHk-0004Yi-Ki for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:48:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:41075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hktHi-0004YK-Vq for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:48:07 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id c2so21771710wrm.8 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O9FdhQqvZnJERXE8C1XHo5bpTi0Em8Vqv7tvR6zIbpw=; b=FvmkOTUD6DkNPabhz/OmxoBnCBRjlaMaK9jE9ytybPrODsg6dol418HZrE5H+FsDxE ON0DHoIEMflkQp4hLCI5aIKb5zjQV+zra8BuXJ053fpHLHduzQUuYD5tjXehLNjuF1wR KvCn3mGCAdb2/Zdb2B4/4A6FpBBUZVJEr7w7MFK14uiG68hetUQ0GqSGSMOL2g5OR+hM 2/a7nJszohlchHUuhKEZy55bJ6tUeUMF5nno1yOgMUqVMRCDEZ5EI+gY31VIJ43BRMSR LZXEmQjT7KIxG5VdaNB3940erZwcd+X1XYfRW10REYnPqpHGY/FplCUfVNSocz+F8GRb J/nQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW0pQsSXoH8l9N+/IRBErvvSPtXgo+i+eqK1BE+5pfzb/ZNspSw vcr4xSj4i0m84rgtpkNa9QYbf7iA1BcO+h3pHxU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPW9qXpQwBMe34Oxfc+snuNiCmmEKAJoGytqExgNlkfRyxVxc7APzmTn//nefM5GKEvh5ZEM/4WQUsAM2MzhA= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f904:: with SMTP id b4mr27416314wrr.291.1562690881151; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:48:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:47:49 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000dd8df2058d42529b" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Also on Debian, the user doesn't have to check the web to find out why a > > bug was closed. Here he just gets a message that it was closed. > > Sure: > [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.67 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.67 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 1.3 PDS_NO_HELO_DNS High profile HELO but no A record X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --000000000000dd8df2058d42529b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Also on Debian, the user doesn't have to check the web to find out why a > > bug was closed. Here he just gets a message that it was closed. > > Sure: > > M-: (gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group 36560) > > :-) Nifty! Would it perhaps be useful to add that to etc/admin/bug-triage (see attached patch)? Thanks, Stefan Kangas --000000000000dd8df2058d42529b Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-admin-notes-bug-triage-New-section-Tips-and-tricks-..patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-admin-notes-bug-triage-New-section-Tips-and-tricks-..patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_jxw1qd1q0 RnJvbSA3ZGEzOWRhNThjOWVjZDJkOGRmZjM4NGRiYmFlMGYwMWQ1NTQwZTExIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5rYW5nYXNAZ21haWwuY29t PgpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDkgSnVsIDIwMTkgMTg6NDQ6MDcgKzAyMDAKU3ViamVjdDogW1BBVENIXSAq IGFkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Zy10cmlhZ2U6IE5ldyBzZWN0aW9uICJUaXBzIGFuZCB0cmlja3MiLgog KEJ1ZyMzNjU2MCkKCi0tLQogYWRtaW4vbm90ZXMvYnVnLXRyaWFnZSB8IDE4ICsrKysrKysrKysr KysrKysrKwogMSBmaWxlIGNoYW5nZWQsIDE4IGluc2VydGlvbnMoKykKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9h ZG1pbi9ub3Rlcy9idWctdHJpYWdlIGIvYWRtaW4vbm90ZXMvYnVnLXRyaWFnZQppbmRleCAyOTc0 ZWVlMTc5Li5jMTA1ZjA2YzU1IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9hZG1pbi9ub3Rlcy9idWctdHJpYWdlCisr KyBiL2FkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Zy10cmlhZ2UKQEAgLTEwNCwzICsxMDQsMjEgQEAgYWNjb3JkaW5n IHRvIHRoZSBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIGZsb3cuICBSZWQgYnVncyBtZWFuIHRoYXQgbm9ib2R5IGhh cwogYW5zd2VyZWQsIHRoZXNlIGJ1Z3MgbmVlZCBwcmltYXJ5IGF0dGVudGlvbi4gIEdyZWVuIGJ1 Z3MgZmxhZyB0aGF0CiB0aGVyZSBpcyBhIHJlY2VudCBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIGFib3V0LCBhbmQg b3JhbmdlIGJ1Z3MgZmxhZyB0aGF0IHRoZQogYnVnIGhhc24ndCBiZWVuIHRvdWNoZWQgZm9yIGF0 IGxlYXN0IHR3byB3ZWVrcy4KKworKiBUaXBzIGFuZCB0cmlja3MKKworKiogU2hvdyBpbmRpdmlk dWFsIGJ1ZyByZXBvcnQgaW4gd2ViIGJyb3dzZXIuCisKK1RvIHNlZSB0aGUgYnVnIHJlcG9ydCBm b3IgQnVnIzEyMyBpbiBhIHdlYiBicm93c2VyLCB2aXNpdCB0aGUgVVJMOgorCisgICBodHRwczov L2RlYmJ1Z3MuZ251Lm9yZy8xMjMKKworKiogU2hvdyBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIGJ1ZyByZXBvcnQgaW4g RW1hY3MuCisKK1RvIGRpc3BsYXkgdGhlIGJ1ZyByZXBvcnQgZm9yIEJ1ZyMxMjMgaW4gZW1hY3M6 CisKKyAgIChyZXF1aXJlICdnbnVzLWdyb3VwKSAgOyBNYWtlIHN1cmUgaXRzIGxvYWRlZAorICAg KGdudXMtcmVhZC1lcGhlbWVyYWwtZW1hY3MtYnVnLWdyb3VwIDEyMykKKworVGhpcyBpcyBlcXVp dmFsZW50IHRvIGRpc3BsYXlpbmcgaXQgdXNpbmcgdGhlIGRlYmJ1Z3MgcGFja2FnZSBhYm92ZSwK K2J1dCBvbmx5IHdvcmtzIGZvciBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIGJ1ZyByZXBvcnRzLgotLSAKMi4xMS4wCgo= --000000000000dd8df2058d42529b-- From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156269128218175 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 16:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hktO4-0004j2-H9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:54:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49622) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hktO2-0004it-Fy for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:54:38 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hktNx-0007Kq-Ul; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:54:36 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAIVBMVEUKDUgAAEsAAU36+ARM S0QAAE+ujyb//wAAAE3+/wjWxRnUA99JAAACNklEQVQ4jbXSQYvaQBQA4FFCK3sypYUcNegiPW3J krA5RXc6LZ5scMCjNdPZklMhxYAnIwbmuNBTb7aRCPmVfZNJXN312gdxzHy+vPG9oLvfL+JO7iE3 DHkRhnkRFnkBEeSw8jxDFtxk6nLlIr/LFTnx5fg/YOP7SxAxRMgFsD0ti6ML4IXPa8CVY0xevSge R3NdbzOtcJ7DTjeSZH4Vu+HhHIYSWnCgaE+yMzAEhKwRjbpPhOI9wEysA7hZDYVOnOOpvhoyJyFw 4BshfO1Qw6NQscZ8NBOztPdQwU9xGjSl00MFZXXRKj/TNKUTLVAwKLe+1yl0yr0HCUuMMSQtyu0+ pXQSu0HZK9nc4WZnqEcBFE5UQ/xD36knAfhZwfERkoYhjColiG9JDR/anxORrKEJAFpomzX8WUPG ZtQsy/sdTwGMdGG2NRKuVvNm3/fpxlSwul/x0FKpt32fUrOC5cmIIsZMUz4qsyzr1/lUbW8c5UiH QBrhYXauSDdUD990tNPJSpADlDHYdE8M6QPoJ4ULNPXNznG0bzH2MJ4ATBBu+NTUnAoYY5xxMsWe 6Gqe1zSvasCYzxmZcjaDsX4hDB1UjX4HaTAqzJmcN30f79XLoMtWz6A++ihPAbB4rUBK2Wz5ewnf PlVgXGPUkLtlRs9ZKGjo7SAuxgxpLeG/o+nE2akaNibQcCdys127t+/TrfO3ehMdq27qOHTng21c w9Mk4C8vzW18o8CCW5tzaLvMXBrXFfwDmRTVdnC3Ri4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:54:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:47:49 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Nifty! Would it perhaps be useful to add that to > etc/admin/bug-triage (see attached patch)? I think so. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > Nifty! Would it perhaps be useful to add that to > etc/admin/bug-triage (see attached patch)? I think so. > +* Tips and tricks > + > +** Show individual bug report in web browser. > + > +To see the bug report for Bug#123 in a web browser, visit the URL: > + > + https://debbugs.gnu.org/123 > + > +** Show individual bug report in Emacs. > + > +To display the bug report for Bug#123 in emacs: > + > + (require 'gnus-group) ; Make sure its loaded I've now added an autoload cookie to the command so that this isn't necessary -- it's a command that can be used without using any other parts of Gnus, so I think that makes sense. > + (gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group 123) > + > +This is equivalent to displaying it using the debbugs package above, > +but only works for individual bug reports. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:01:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 36560@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156269163018836 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:01:03 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 17:00:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hktTh-0004tk-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:00:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:35347) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hktTf-0004tL-6l for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:00:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id y4so13244788wrm.2 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:00:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1J2S4iW9Wy80hd9tdjSz/XUPdRfmlfE4iHuzGhCjl/g=; b=GbH72QSPid6l10ixZQBqPDgAjmW/9QSLsb/PIH95nr5pr/9TA/eoDtJBt9mcaONVnK SvClI5r1ljHdjUO26w9KDZp8z1EpfyRKUwtNIasnnRH/hgg+mp94dsulDZksFUtMkcHw Iv+Mob9owcTWUPEVR2PFzKmnZ9V+WA5dp2yWn9S00+5j78T+36eIke+oq4TZES3jEyNr p9b5xpYXsfJW/+XmHKQm9GFvGoVtEe3crqVUNjuy6upUj6LKumRVDA4I815Qv+oqhu6z uFSMZpTAN+EWt+cvRqpazx/aBOCepO1EBEeKGiq7BNoK2K/TF882676w75GvmJ562B99 crvw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUX6YFBqVtQgVSZHkPKUzP99oiXdDcmTEPWmO5odKqM/U+rxWUv r4wi0Ihv+slsW7sufJFFxbs6ZnEPMtqUkEzljKs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwoMJ0nIJ3i5tFhY+O3TiiTA5GXHZnnembEM2kQleabPmlEZOHukhynD+VINPYG50BeOCgIRITUUIm72lOUrR8= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f904:: with SMTP id b4mr27458307wrr.291.1562691621314; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:00:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:00:10 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000fb8c11058d427ed7" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > + (require 'gnus-group) ; Make sure its loaded > > I've now added an autoload cookie to the command so that this isn't > necessary -- it's a command that can be used without using any other > part [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnus.org] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 1.3 PDS_NO_HELO_DNS High profile HELO but no A record X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --000000000000fb8c11058d427ed7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > + (require 'gnus-group) ; Make sure its loaded > > I've now added an autoload cookie to the command so that this isn't > necessary -- it's a command that can be used without using any other > parts of Gnus, so I think that makes sense. Thanks. I've attached an updated patch without the require. Thanks, Stefan Kangas --000000000000fb8c11058d427ed7 Content-Type: application/x-patch; name="0001-admin-notes-bug-triage-New-section-Tips-and-tricks-..patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-admin-notes-bug-triage-New-section-Tips-and-tricks-..patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_jxw276za0 RnJvbSAyNDQ3YTE4ZDUzNmY2NTcwM2RkYmE1NTM1MGQzOTg3M2Q2ZDM5YTY0IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5rYW5nYXNAZ21haWwuY29t PgpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDkgSnVsIDIwMTkgMTg6NDQ6MDcgKzAyMDAKU3ViamVjdDogW1BBVENIXSAq IGFkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Zy10cmlhZ2U6IE5ldyBzZWN0aW9uICJUaXBzIGFuZCB0cmlja3MiLgog KEJ1ZyMzNjU2MCkKCi0tLQogYWRtaW4vbm90ZXMvYnVnLXRyaWFnZSB8IDE3ICsrKysrKysrKysr KysrKysrCiAxIGZpbGUgY2hhbmdlZCwgMTcgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygrKQoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2Fk bWluL25vdGVzL2J1Zy10cmlhZ2UgYi9hZG1pbi9ub3Rlcy9idWctdHJpYWdlCmluZGV4IDI5NzRl ZWUxNzkuLjExNzBlMjlkMmUgMTAwNjQ0Ci0tLSBhL2FkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Zy10cmlhZ2UKKysr IGIvYWRtaW4vbm90ZXMvYnVnLXRyaWFnZQpAQCAtMTA0LDMgKzEwNCwyMCBAQCBhY2NvcmRpbmcg dG8gdGhlIGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gZmxvdy4gIFJlZCBidWdzIG1lYW4gdGhhdCBub2JvZHkgaGFz CiBhbnN3ZXJlZCwgdGhlc2UgYnVncyBuZWVkIHByaW1hcnkgYXR0ZW50aW9uLiAgR3JlZW4gYnVn cyBmbGFnIHRoYXQKIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgcmVjZW50IGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gYWJvdXQsIGFuZCBv cmFuZ2UgYnVncyBmbGFnIHRoYXQgdGhlCiBidWcgaGFzbid0IGJlZW4gdG91Y2hlZCBmb3IgYXQg bGVhc3QgdHdvIHdlZWtzLgorCisqIFRpcHMgYW5kIHRyaWNrcworCisqKiBTaG93IGluZGl2aWR1 YWwgYnVnIHJlcG9ydCBpbiB3ZWIgYnJvd3Nlci4KKworVG8gc2VlIHRoZSBidWcgcmVwb3J0IGZv ciBCdWcjMTIzIGluIGEgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXIsIHZpc2l0IHRoZSBVUkw6CisKKyAgIGh0dHBzOi8v ZGViYnVncy5nbnUub3JnLzEyMworCisqKiBTaG93IGluZGl2aWR1YWwgYnVnIHJlcG9ydCBpbiBF bWFjcy4KKworVG8gZGlzcGxheSB0aGUgYnVnIHJlcG9ydCBmb3IgQnVnIzEyMyBpbiBlbWFjczoK KworICAgKGdudXMtcmVhZC1lcGhlbWVyYWwtZW1hY3MtYnVnLWdyb3VwIDEyMykKKworVGhpcyBp cyBlcXVpdmFsZW50IHRvIGRpc3BsYXlpbmcgaXQgdXNpbmcgdGhlIGRlYmJ1Z3MgcGFja2FnZSBh Ym92ZSwKK2J1dCBvbmx5IHdvcmtzIGZvciBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIGJ1ZyByZXBvcnRzLgotLSAKMi4x MS4wCgo= --000000000000fb8c11058d427ed7-- From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Stefan Kangas Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 36560@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.15627064283107 (code B ref 36560); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 21:07:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkxKN-0000o3-S8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:07:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:41965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkxKK-0000nQ-3Z for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:07:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id c2so242674wrm.8 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:07:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=yVW5IFNrm5SpjRMLjQ163gx+9kBAL1o8N727YTo5PJo=; b=hju/8q77NFhCox0S/Dn/1jC/qWQq1ZRXPtg65QYx113P1+6I12CxY0sfxgDCtFluYI awOo1PjsfzQFArWFniEstY0RbmIiPHxB1Uz+uMS3F8/43T7qJn3SnW4o87TLWBUTtkfL wP7HxjvFUNRkRelN858no9dGjDNv9Zwv5/QYWGo4DD1+Vd9VBNfAxiNr8KMgGCZedAPG waq6OIIbLAPbF8rfR/RCAJbwH1R0FTvc1sSW202IVfBZzeSXC4BN3j2pcF3qN0TZoPeW XnA6wHPhYhjVTyMVQ6zQnGysaLtS+bw3TLzq0LwI9dJUFFRdO/LR/YenfaS/Mq+i6Icf SJ0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yVW5IFNrm5SpjRMLjQ163gx+9kBAL1o8N727YTo5PJo=; b=KXMY069eGpY3+lEo4CgSn3J00RY0MalCI2xkBHlBNs6IhmHjWogFqmkEx4AK/nzl3e UsUNIuW8msFiU0qORx38MZ+XjCcFfWRbIhzydrzG29nytKPQD5vCh2Ud4BjenuwfBkca vFX80yZ/zzqVA4eeay/tvrXPk+7gV2kQrYWOy6u35ROc7RO7hJ62Q51ZAziplmEQ4Xox bgtLCaRZfgdjUuKI/7ECairvXkHUqdGq7gjB1GEqn9ZbhZtrgzrSuO/Vlv8rzp96uhzY rSdMqUr+/eZzhzBGuwfdwsEqfXOEFXdohlEJFJWAvrE+VpXqwCh0MrSfz6mCW1A7IrMg ECpA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXHk3qpXc3/JqSuEsszMcGIzbv+FJN/lw3zNjy1WD2EZFGIBXuH batxpSMy18uaoN6n9ODf4jQoUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0J2y1mKHodVlD4YnVtbwUcQqhufMs3PcNNS2R5OWbC8hHVlqm7NtIEiPdpz0j1KtTZiTtLg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1043:: with SMTP id c3mr17278312wrx.236.1562706418302; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:1f68:7ff5:120d:64e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm20302019wrv.89.2019.07.09.14.06.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 14:06:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:06:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:00:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87tvbuzzm7.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > diff --git a/admin/notes/bug-triage b/admin/notes/bug-triage > index 2974eee179..1170e29d2e 100644 > --- a/admin/notes/bug-triage > +++ b/admin/notes/bug-triage > @@ -104,3 +104,20 @@ according to t [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.68 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.3 PDS_NO_HELO_DNS High profile HELO but no A record X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Stefan Kangas writes: > diff --git a/admin/notes/bug-triage b/admin/notes/bug-triage > index 2974eee179..1170e29d2e 100644 > --- a/admin/notes/bug-triage > +++ b/admin/notes/bug-triage > @@ -104,3 +104,20 @@ according to the communication flow. Red bugs mean that nobody has > answered, these bugs need primary attention. Green bugs flag that > there is a recent communication about, and orange bugs flag that the > bug hasn't been touched for at least two weeks. > + > +* Tips and tricks > + > +** Show individual bug report in web browser. > + > +To see the bug report for Bug#123 in a web browser, visit the URL: > + > + https://debbugs.gnu.org/123 > + > +** Show individual bug report in Emacs. > + > +To display the bug report for Bug#123 in emacs: Nit: The second "emacs" should probably be capitalised. > + (gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group 123) Is M-x notation preferred? (I don't mind.) > +This is equivalent to displaying it using the debbugs package above, > +but only works for individual bug reports. FWIW, the Debbugs URL format and M-x gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group trick are already described in admin/notes/bugtracker, which is referenced at the start of bug-triage: This document just describes the procedure of triaging bugs, for information on how to work with the bug tracker, see the bugtracker file in this same directory for the basics. You can also install the debbugs ELPA package for access to M-x debbugs-gnu, an emacs interface to debbugs, and M-x debbugs-org, an emacs interface via org-mode. But I don't mind if bug-triage summarises the same information. Thanks, -- Basil From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 36560@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.15627186337901 (code B ref 36560); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2019 00:30:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34594 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl0VE-00023M-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 20:30:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:39691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hl0VA-000235-V3 for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 20:30:29 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id x4so615889wrt.6 for <36560@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:30:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UternS8TjUJDAS6P2nwDm7i6T+PK7N3Un1Wz7PSrzuY=; b=tYuiDWxWM5wP3agfHHEcMlHYw+IebyU6rB5xZITotc9nrvdUmiNP1DgTK+XzbmJai2 0dJI1eKZym8z9Xgg2nXUbIYRAu12hzSdHqwFay0M/YqW1cLvSZz3aftf/X6zlDFW7hxV V6FB6lb4eqhS60r9VFfuJ3nd7MWKqfpD7aFNhJ8VcrmkWEeB6lzk37HiBJaCTmWnzBl8 Pk0iHA42bRQYAYCkBfg629aSUl7NP4OGliT0xO3v1PkvOzsWJRJgXPmJVB4NMF/sahOi EhrTerPo4Ojn4UaxY6VvO9x2EBWX3QgvvYzYsOzNCifXJWm6gOKtHf7ZHhlBCH/edmMR NAHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXoClYYBA3OX0yvpeBd1SNMVfz1SlkHLFrqyiHtGwNHYuy1P1sV ReuJqs7ZweSo6VntFHAIXx7qpQ52GhPPbZnJ5k4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyYQ+1A4OWyZ7IiqtoxoGTZ+zvDKdhkT/ffXkiPASypC08Q+RsJ2/8Jtj29lQ35MUMLinpJhxxv1Y+dA+QXNek= X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb49:: with SMTP id u9mr28695253wrn.215.1562718623131; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:30:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tvbuzzm7.fsf@tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <87tvbuzzm7.fsf@tcd.ie> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:30:11 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000006a8093058d48c803" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Basil L. Contovounesios writes: > FWIW, the Debbugs URL format and M-x gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group > trick are already described in admin/notes/bugtracker, which is > referenced at the start of bug-triage: Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.67 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.67 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 1.3 PDS_NO_HELO_DNS High profile HELO but no A record X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) --0000000000006a8093058d48c803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Basil L. Contovounesios writes: > FWIW, the Debbugs URL format and M-x gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group > trick are already described in admin/notes/bugtracker, which is > referenced at the start of bug-triage: Dang, you are correct. Maybe it's not a good idea to duplicate information (lest one of the locations will fall out of sync with the other). But the bugtracker file makes it sound like you need to be a Gnus user to use M-x gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group, which is a bit misleading. It also doesn't mention how to view a bug in its "Quick-start guide". The attached patch tries to fix the above two issues by adding a new section "How do I read a bug?" to the "Quick-start guide" with both of these methods covered. What do you think? Thanks, Stefan Kangas --0000000000006a8093058d48c803 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-Add-new-section-on-reading-a-bug-to-admin-notes-bugt.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Add-new-section-on-reading-a-bug-to-admin-notes-bugt.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_jxwi4kmk0 RnJvbSA0NDU5M2I3MTExZmJlYTAwYzAxMWI2MzU5YzcxYjE0NTRkZmQyNGRmIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5rYW5nYXNAZ21haWwuY29t PgpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDkgSnVsIDIwMTkgMTg6NDQ6MDcgKzAyMDAKU3ViamVjdDogW1BBVENIXSBB ZGQgbmV3IHNlY3Rpb24gb24gcmVhZGluZyBhIGJ1ZyB0byBhZG1pbi9ub3Rlcy9idWd0cmFja2Vy CgoqIGFkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Z3RyYWNrZXI6IE5ldyBzZWN0aW9uICJIb3cgZG8gSSByZWFkIGEg YnVnPyIgaW4KIlF1aWNrc3RhcnQiLiAoQnVnIzM2NTYwKQotLS0KIGFkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Z3Ry YWNrZXIgfCA0ICsrKysKIDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCA0IGluc2VydGlvbnMoKykKCmRpZmYgLS1n aXQgYS9hZG1pbi9ub3Rlcy9idWd0cmFja2VyIGIvYWRtaW4vbm90ZXMvYnVndHJhY2tlcgppbmRl eCA5MmFlMzI2ZmZkLi5iODkwYjg5MTY2IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9hZG1pbi9ub3Rlcy9idWd0cmFj a2VyCisrKyBiL2FkbWluL25vdGVzL2J1Z3RyYWNrZXIKQEAgLTExLDYgKzExLDEwIEBAIFVzZSBN LXggcmVwb3J0LWVtYWNzLWJ1Zywgb3Igc2VuZCBtYWlsIHRvIGJ1Zy1nbnUtZW1hY3NAZ251Lm9y Zy4KIElmIHlvdSB3YW50IHRvIENjIHNvbWVvbmUsIHVzZSBhbiAiWC1EZWJidWdzLUNjIiBoZWFk ZXIgKG9yCiBwc2V1ZG8taGVhZGVyLCBzZWUgYmVsb3cpIGluc3RlYWQuCiAKKyoqIEhvdyBkbyBJ IHJlYWQgYSBidWc/CitWaXNpdCBodHRwczovL2RlYmJ1Z3MuZ251Lm9yZy8xMjMgaW4geW91ciB3 ZWIgYnJvd3NlciBvciB0cnkgdGhpcyBpbgorRW1hY3M6IE0teCBnbnVzLXJlYWQtZXBoZW1lcmFs LWVtYWNzLWJ1Zy1ncm91cC4KKwogKiogSG93IGRvIEkgY29tbWVudCBvbiBhIGJ1Zz8KIFJlcGx5 IHRvIGEgbWFpbCBvbiB0aGUgYnVnLWdudS1lbWFjcyBsaXN0IGluIHRoZSBub3JtYWwgd2F5Lgog T3Igc2VuZCBhIG1haWwgdG8gMTIzQGRlYmJ1Z3MuZ251Lm9yZy4KLS0gCjIuMTEuMAoK --0000000000006a8093058d48c803-- From unknown Sun Aug 17 01:02:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36560: Adding tags is not proof that anybody actually read the bug report Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: Stefan Kangas Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 36560@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 36560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36560.156275914229716 (code B ref 36560); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 36560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2019 11:45:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlB2b-0007iw-MG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:45:41 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:36230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlB2a-0007h3-Nb for 36560@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:45:41 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlB2U-0008KU-GH; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:45:36 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <874l3vwhqk.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y317v2jc.5.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <83lfx75jm1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvbvw7g4.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tvbuzzm7.fsf@tcd.ie> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:45:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 10 Jul 2019 02:30:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > The attached patch tries to fix the above two issues by adding a new section > "How do I read a bug?" to the "Quick-start guide" with both of these methods > covered. > > What do you think? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > The attached patch tries to fix the above two issues by adding a new section > "How do I read a bug?" to the "Quick-start guide" with both of these methods > covered. > > What do you think? Looks good to me; applied. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no