GNU bug report logs - #36544
'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>

Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 23:27:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36544: closed ('set-paths' should exclude 'source' from
 consideration)
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:37:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:35:51 +0100
with message-id <87o8ixa488.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36544,
regarding 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
36544: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36544
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:12 -0400
The 'set-paths' phase in (guix build gnu-build-system) currently
includes 'source' in the set of candidates for inclusion in the
search-path variables.

First of all, I think it's undesirable to include subdirectories of the
source directory in these search paths.  However, if you think it's
desirable, there's another problem: it's fragile.  It depends on:

 (1) whether the source is a tarball or an unpacked checkout, and
 (2) whether the subdirectories specified in the search-paths
     (e.g. 'include') are within the top source directory.

Currently, if you change the 'source' field of a package from a tarball
to an (unpacked) VCS checkout, there *might* be additional components
added to the environment variables, depending on the source tree layout.

For example, this causes our 'linux-libre' package to fail to build if
you substitute its 'source' field for a git checkout, as Chris Webber
discovered here:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00058.html
  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00062.html

Also, if any package depends on the current behavior, it will break if
its 'source' is changed from a VCS checkout to a release tarball.

To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I
suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within
the 'set-paths' phase.  What do you think?

Also, does anyone know of other procedures that do something similiar?

     Thanks,
       Mark


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>, Ludovic Courtès
 <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36544-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:35:51 +0100
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skriver:

> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:24:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I
>> > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within
>> > the 'set-paths' phase.  What do you think?
>> 
>> I agree.  We should do that in the next ‘core-updates’.
>
> Now is a good time to make this change.

This was fixed in 968f541c36c28c413f696558505f902d0a133d58.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 156 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.