From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:21:40 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#36544 <36544@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#36544 <36544@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration Reply-To: bug#36544 <36544@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:21:40 +0000 retitle 36544 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration reassign 36544 guix submitter 36544 Mark H Weaver severity 36544 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 07 19:26:45 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2019 23:26:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkGYP-00059b-Ez for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:45 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkGYN-00059U-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkGYM-0006oO-Oa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkGYL-0001eb-L4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:42 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:53214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkGYL-0001e6-Hm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:41 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkGYJ-0006Oo-PP; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:39 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:26:12 -0400 Message-ID: <871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 64.112.178.59 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) The 'set-paths' phase in (guix build gnu-build-system) currently includes 'source' in the set of candidates for inclusion in the search-path variables. First of all, I think it's undesirable to include subdirectories of the source directory in these search paths. However, if you think it's desirable, there's another problem: it's fragile. It depends on: (1) whether the source is a tarball or an unpacked checkout, and (2) whether the subdirectories specified in the search-paths (e.g. 'include') are within the top source directory. Currently, if you change the 'source' field of a package from a tarball to an (unpacked) VCS checkout, there *might* be additional components added to the environment variables, depending on the source tree layout. For example, this causes our 'linux-libre' package to fail to build if you substitute its 'source' field for a git checkout, as Chris Webber discovered here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00058.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00062.html Also, if any package depends on the current behavior, it will break if its 'source' is changed from a VCS checkout to a release tarball. To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? Also, does anyone know of other procedures that do something similiar? Thanks, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 11 17:25:05 2019 Received: (at 36544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2019 21:25:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlgYr-0000B9-2N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:25:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlgYo-0000AZ-VA for 36544@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:25:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlgYj-0004aU-K7; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:24:57 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51590 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hlgYj-0004WJ-3a; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:24:57 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration References: <871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 Messidor an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:24:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgrcnu1k.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36544 Cc: 36544@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > The 'set-paths' phase in (guix build gnu-build-system) currently > includes 'source' in the set of candidates for inclusion in the > search-path variables. Oh, that was certainly not intended. > First of all, I think it's undesirable to include subdirectories of the > source directory in these search paths. However, if you think it's > desirable, there's another problem: it's fragile. It depends on: > > (1) whether the source is a tarball or an unpacked checkout, and > (2) whether the subdirectories specified in the search-paths > (e.g. 'include') are within the top source directory. > > Currently, if you change the 'source' field of a package from a tarball > to an (unpacked) VCS checkout, there *might* be additional components > added to the environment variables, depending on the source tree layout. > > For example, this causes our 'linux-libre' package to fail to build if > you substitute its 'source' field for a git checkout, as Chris Webber > discovered here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00058.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2019-07/msg00062.html > > Also, if any package depends on the current behavior, it will break if > its 'source' is changed from a VCS checkout to a release tarball. Indeed, that=E2=80=99s terrible. I suppose we were just lucky not to hit s= uch issues before! > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? I agree. We should do that in the next =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 01 00:51:31 2020 Received: (at 36544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2020 04:51:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfcQ7-00027k-MT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 00:51:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com ([209.85.210.48]:45383) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfcQ6-00027S-AF for 36544@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 00:51:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id m2so5039239otr.12 for <36544@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 21:51:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aMqzilsBRb3F6IH0bad8PVReDUYTmJHWnGoVlIcR6vA=; b=Pn91HRAK8E1TiJrn/PNEGXfaAOuwVTYv8zctbafI8UKMMQOv/OM0LXICASoOkEs5Cq hyYqdsZvuba9vGDYdYy1uuk4P3zdpaUSLo59d3pB+nl492Hs4FfIw1GmDuVxY2upEXWn e4ggd9D16rIcBkCMiRZV0Y+6ElRYpWsr9MphdNx4efhtINVkHER9lajaUmiMpzZ8sJiA 3EcN7zSd3B6dyaSxpq/TRy03rWIS8jwKPgbL9IDOA9eKUxNTPR0ksaQKIBhLiutvsabz rWSOZQe9dJe7tA+2f+NDacJov4o4wKYkZ+NRCRbhdvJdD7XJAa2LOYpUmfgxwGxFzfb5 edfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aMqzilsBRb3F6IH0bad8PVReDUYTmJHWnGoVlIcR6vA=; b=U76JL5fctQVWkp4bBiJRdHn5HczgCcpRN8R9UItsRIYMnAIbzStdGsV2HPPCkPgL/o eoAOFw5KpZyFhv79VPC6m4SoBoj4kxJrqqGcwShl53vu/KELXnN1su/LV1jU923+PXDD TQcARmCrKuefhUCtZAjqJ6slPw6yScmvJ7EIA/mugXlVtbnZ4jTufQMjlD8y3aJSVPxH gawChY9zsJZ3UTCyQ94TWvE4jx7rUfSNWmJdM00nk/psPJmJTyjUX4E/n3Br0eue/474 TZ1ZhCE+phWB7zitu3Yt9p9QspmV6O/nzk+dK5nuwyY5zFr596/SFP42aDRqZfzJ7Qc1 Mdew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ASrET5v6/uRDMcpl2iwyQeohVn+JjPxFl7pqXTYsrwgApanYP RNWpFuRyVrap3VDDTQTI00y2XdyCSGo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybIIavLoyBimox05ZjGAmqxTrlL6pnFsIAkoKXg0LKRPH8jORSlEFGZTOiqzyDjPJhx+Vz8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d69:: with SMTP id l9mr16512890oti.127.1590987084297; Sun, 31 May 2020 21:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lore ([2601:281:8080:45f0:f9f7:6f9e:7313:8779]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm2653444oot.2.2020.05.31.21.51.23 for <36544@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 31 May 2020 21:51:23 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.5; emacs 28.0.50 From: Aiko Kyle To: 36544@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 22:51:22 -0600 Message-ID: <86sgffmlrp.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36544 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin=20 > > method, I > > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration=20 > > within > > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? >=20 > I agree. We should do that in the next =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. I recently ran into this bug myself and was surprised that there=20 would be a difference between building from a tarball and a git=20 checkout. It seems the fix should be fairly straight forward so=20 are there any plans to implement it? Thanks, Aiko From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 13 14:31:02 2020 Received: (at 36544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2020 19:31:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50294 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koX5C-0007rS-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:02 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koX5B-0007qf-7B for 36544@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:01 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377365C0040; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=3lhy/y+fqoaVRJQiuQyjpuN1QwnpErqWiX6Mchvg5SM=; b=lRVSJQ5fyNDg LAVNDjU3p12U3sHXqhsgs1wVEfiJTj9TG+SDWndip02oY4re0OOXxhCwUIklA7i4 QjUVPjVGK9rlWABbCi9q47IpVib2jEawrvEzSjJSibfr76Xf4D4yDLQZT+1byfnv OTk5OmeXee9VKgIeH4VR9zCZi+zOPdU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3lhy/y+fqoaVRJQiuQyjpuN1QwnpErqWiX6Mchvg5 SM=; b=PpAQeyzfKAXkcoU50ldXq7o9sbuJuKBjYGwA70v2OPrQfMVHw+pV99b4m Y/h/xto6/81ZyFP3bEKk7Y6yq6tkPZJA06Y7rSvZ+LKy0TaPiOEobdx2JamamNwX XWi+70A3hU3mqRDGJOabNcv7Z2GkxlQ8d0m8OAKKk5O8oTQ2w7W3oIMEDQLqa0Dw N/t5/W8rU8TYhfWklDCAj79ojO9l7jadwSWtnHmGSYEBDRaoMNZKx2WECRCCP3WQ 6LnAYhNpBMX4+XA/pw/pObZeFFRuart+ET8dtQorHvFAmTyG6fWLwxyplI1B3aKv /T7ki7P8UyVY9bj6ccio67cLRomtA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudekiedguddvjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegjeeggeehtddugfffuddtvdfffeffjeekffffveffheegvddvuedtffek jeejjeenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghm vg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 591BE240057; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:51 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration Message-ID: References: <871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org> <87sgrcnu1k.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87sgrcnu1k.fsf@inria.fr> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36544 Cc: Mark H Weaver , 36544@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:24:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I > > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within > > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? > > I agree. We should do that in the next ‘core-updates’. Now is a good time to make this change. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 13 14:36:02 2020 Received: (at 36544-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2020 19:36:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koXA2-0008EP-Ga for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:36:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koXA0-0008Db-LM for 36544-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:36:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koX9v-0006Nv-1H; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:35:55 -0500 Received: from host-37-191-236-253.lynet.no ([37.191.236.253]:32886 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1koX9u-0003Ol-1d; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:35:54 -0500 From: Marius Bakke To: Leo Famulari , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration In-Reply-To: References: <871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org> <87sgrcnu1k.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:35:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8ixa488.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36544-done Cc: 36544-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari skriver: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:24:55PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I >> > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within >> > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? >>=20 >> I agree. We should do that in the next =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > > Now is a good time to make this change. This was fixed in 968f541c36c28c413f696558505f902d0a133d58. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCgAtFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl/WbRcPHG1hcml1c0Bn bnUub3JnAAoJEKKgbfKjOlT6OKYH/RmztXspSopD2+rHncR6UEj1mQlyKOSeA4hJ 3ajZL8A1bwjOo/J/8Uk7V5f7JxbvB6ZeKnhPuCi/IuA167By+KPc0+46O7as0XtD Bv10YwjIgXVAnsIwX87cxFmT+4I5qBKlsic+2x/C2H5GszG8IqErq494Rl2pisOk RjDUdPnvYaV0s5wyc+hV6zqo497ANyFPNMp+ZKGgSgNSqDHbcvZ4ZcBC260xr1xw BWgCYt054utKf2b+b5AGYLoq7d88LpcsHLmlh8wJQmYEdwNR45yEaF4OLiuc5vwi r1KO5ZQwIxbRvI0veAf0ohkNVT93Xyp4CuPxV6p/kbfc0K6v64U= =fD3f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:21:40 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator