From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:27:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#36517 <36517@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#36517 <36517@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 'guix deploy' does not restart services Reply-To: bug#36517 <36517@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 15:27:08 +0000 retitle 36517 'guix deploy' does not restart services reassign 36517 guix submitter 36517 zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) severity 36517 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 05 19:24:16 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2019 23:24:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXYt-0006wC-Mw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:24:16 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXYp-0006vt-TH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:24:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXYo-0002kx-O9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:24:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXYn-0001oZ-NB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:24:10 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:56409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hjXYn-0001mZ-Fm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:24:09 -0400 Received: from Upsilon (mobile-166-171-185-104.mycingular.net [166.171.185.104]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x65NNtB2025443 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 23:24:05 GMT From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: 'guix deploy' does not restart services User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:23:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain This issue is described in more detail at [1]. Essentially, 'guix deploy' is will happily load and start new services, as well as unload obsolete services, but does nothing to restart valid services that are already running. I can assign myself to this issue. Just filing for tracking purposes :] Regards, Jakob [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2019-06/msg00567.html --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl0f2/wACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2Vr1rBAArh5F5KeS111j5duBhOQLKI4yytKbNzdLM/iugmFsEkdrHdImMdEoFPUN iapU1J2Tf0S3pWGpx5rXkMQKI40vV2nkprzSJ4FzGln3Rvcrf37LQpzp4oax4wEX jHUsK/JMGc0LrYd0iy1YMotkRW9/VSNET6QpS+1CIvsbSxfMwurQyovqvuEmPlAq E6Xvu5Mc6QeyTuYt4timMriHrHiGGTxWy6LUa+2w+XSVqqU5N6xxchvly1t/x51y 5zW+1Su+Plrd0I+eW1XM0kXrZVstNXH/y0OGPXml+7bbWg/NiRYbHmIUxd37PC/F 8F92C0LFuQaHe424aIl6YUrszZh6EpCCynvTOT5261SfpiJswrA13AEilWXDfWRt QcDpdRD/57sIGCcvMi8rTQVVUSKTw7CZEkWz1/dATyoYabnpqPJwmUUq+WzNtga0 Ev1FhoEnfOVrhFt6cr+sjjTCQdxWmkVa4AcgbJPCl3lOWkvDq1Fj7KwAN2TjOws+ iKKMjSAhMgvy/DxHiFvBWBqGbwMjZOYZ3nWT9DeoYdAA+MXNPIUmryCwRzoGwpBy G0B7Tr35/hqFozTXyXAPj1kG5aI6m+rLGHVckE2bUOPZ2LSNr7Q9BeR98tS9idLw rLt/UCo/lrPffWOJ8T8m/I0J5R4bK8yG1si6BWK9Xb7XOxQfp2U= =OVwJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 11 11:32:47 2019 Received: (at 36517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2019 15:32:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlb3u-00046F-1w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:32:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlb3q-000460-13 for 36517@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:32:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlb3k-0001QH-KT; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:32:36 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=43196 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hlb3h-0003Bo-Q4; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:32:34 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 Messidor an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:32:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:23:40 -0400") Message-ID: <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517 Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > This issue is described in more detail at [1]. Essentially, 'guix > deploy' is will happily load and start new services, as well as unload > obsolete services, but does nothing to restart valid services that are > already running. That=E2=80=99s not a bug: =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 does no= t restart already running services, simply because it cannot tell whether now is a good time to restart them. It=E2=80=99s a decision that=E2=80=99s left to the s= ystem administrator. However, note that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 loads =E2=80= =9Creplacements=E2=80=9D for each Shepherd service, such that next time you run =E2=80=98herd restart FO= O=E2=80=99, you spawn that new version of FOO. Does that make sense? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 11 13:05:12 2019 Received: (at 36517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2019 17:05:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlcVL-0004Wb-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:05:12 -0400 Received: from ol.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:63038 helo=mx.sdf.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlcVH-0004WL-Hx for 36517@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:05:09 -0400 Received: from Upsilon (mobile-107-107-56-49.mycingular.net [107.107.56.49]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x6BH52RY020827 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:05:04 GMT From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:05:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:32:31 +0200") Message-ID: <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517 Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ludovic! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > >> This issue is described in more detail at [1]. Essentially, 'guix >> deploy' is will happily load and start new services, as well as unload >> obsolete services, but does nothing to restart valid services that are >> already running. > > That=E2=80=99s not a bug: =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 does = not restart already > running services, simply because it cannot tell whether now is a good > time to restart them. It=E2=80=99s a decision that=E2=80=99s left to the= system > administrator. > > However, note that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 loads =E2=80= =9Creplacements=E2=80=9D for > each Shepherd service, such that next time you run =E2=80=98herd restart = FOO=E2=80=99, > you spawn that new version of FOO. > > Does that make sense? Yes, that does make sense. I suppose the way I worded the initial report wasn't great; I opened this to track support for 'restart-strategy' as described in #33508 in 'guix deploy'. This takes care of the question of when a good time to restart the service would be. Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl0nbDwACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2Vp2Kw//byxrE/csx6boyhw+RLfEwdTrxenZpTonY9zM6rznU48ML8PzTIDv+iDR hqUhLbTmhjXnWZ/2Rb8qPD3vgE8HBYRd4s1bIW40YavFbQUum3QXnvYJ5QYu/7ca 5BqTjukazyKrLysTdANveoMdz4URP1iZ9EWkWQatC8+LbDN0cu2G4+Fl1m6UVAKM S86ROXjloJEXfCX9fA08Ws0Eirj3IPhVKOooeVZ0yR3Brw27Mul4BNuP8OHYxe2O qaZhvFelFbUdPTu4HDSr434IaePd4ISrbv4rxptQgiNIYwA4HbuqtSL89Iaw8yFD A8m8+1icc4X3L7hvxp+s65Uw0eeI+RGIyuEgJcrLhy2jGqN2fB4aLBLqls59DLkT Yp74pprhv6+ixA8+gLzukiQkfD2hzGo7YU44be12muOBQIOOUjUnMkzc5+Z25Pej Bpc5KdpH9P0Y8FrSfgO2SWzs4GAq7vcHozENj0bnPQtjxrThMLsCSx11+f5vkjgp zmbYu9ZxQplOm3a+MTMoDBqL2cWVDF6myAI5D5iiCm7yg0XSRQ48qzj6f1germNV 3giuzIRxUvldYcJof49IkjkkRk4sLIBUhUEWgkD6f+Px7mkWwR0FXfeLg6vuHGR3 On2tCoD2y08ObvRK0nbIfHfN2PiG0oPCCBdCldIwEwTLghEsMOQ= =ABmW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 16:43:33 2019 Received: (at 36517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 20:43:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm2OD-0004kA-7H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:43:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm2O9-0004ju-Bx for 36517@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:43:32 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm2O4-0005pZ-2K; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:43:24 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=53234 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hm2O3-0004vz-Kj; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:43:23 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 Messidor an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:43:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:05:00 -0400") Message-ID: <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517 Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Howdy! zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hi, >> >> zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: >> >>> This issue is described in more detail at [1]. Essentially, 'guix >>> deploy' is will happily load and start new services, as well as unload >>> obsolete services, but does nothing to restart valid services that are >>> already running. >> >> That=E2=80=99s not a bug: =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 does= not restart already >> running services, simply because it cannot tell whether now is a good >> time to restart them. It=E2=80=99s a decision that=E2=80=99s left to th= e system >> administrator. >> >> However, note that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 loads =E2= =80=9Creplacements=E2=80=9D for >> each Shepherd service, such that next time you run =E2=80=98herd restart= FOO=E2=80=99, >> you spawn that new version of FOO. >> >> Does that make sense? > > Yes, that does make sense. I suppose the way I worded the initial report > wasn't great; I opened this to track support for 'restart-strategy' as > described in #33508 in 'guix deploy'. This takes care of the question of > when a good time to restart the service would be. Oh, I see. To me that=E2=80=99s completely orthogonal to =E2=80=98guix dep= loy=E2=80=99 though, in that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98guix deploy= =E2=80=99 should use the same code for that. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 13 13:15:04 2019 Received: (at 36517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2019 17:15:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmLby-00059g-3m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:15:04 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:50504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmLbw-000590-DN for 36517@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:15:00 -0400 Received: from Upsilon (mobile-166-172-63-162.mycingular.net [166.172.63.162]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x6DHEix6010504 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 13 Jul 2019 17:14:53 GMT From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:14:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:43:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517 Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Heyo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Oh, I see. To me that=E2=80=99s completely orthogonal to =E2=80=98guix de= ploy=E2=80=99 though, > in that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98guix deplo= y=E2=80=99 should use the > same code for that. > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. Yeah, I believe it would be safe to close this once the code for 'guix deploy' and 'guix system reconfigure' is unified. I opened this under the impression that the two would remain separate and individual changes would need to occur for both. Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl0qEYAACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2Voz9RAAsjh89iCx/Jw7Z05fNVr53o1SEjP5X0D2pZtkrcM0kEeTiaVdGR4raDYI Dwvye0t5hzS+I7nQr5AiEunRRjs6nL5bpSfOsxR/zBeWeHH09ibKUz5Nx5g+2a25 QgFYRWZZkrHeYvQ25HI5lF0R8Mo8BISBRTJ7kFNqoh89xIFXWgaBzht8wUSu8bgA Hz4wQZ33H1Z3K1YkKTqRfTO4qitnSJnsuH8TGQEVFoklpm07u/cbJ/X9hgkJnzIT PJCvh/I3WZiFL5CT4FbwVxUawj78TkC40qVLxE++8PM/lmW+BdOEzxTm7HZDkEkA aD8orz5eAqRIFv2jIohtHoAyTLX8D2sS+5pDHVE8bWeOLUge9CpjK8ReqIrYUHFm pqcWDpGCu0kEbSYaaCZOR6QEqOpWDJb6CEWNNvp7SbFN/RpMn3QjLWElcQiiIRJs wFzD/jmz0s0Wfzz4zhpr7HaYRdluXjnvh7RCACA92IWxnol3OxSTm6ezuTWyWnOB xRMMuTRXtkTogcD4TPz26HV2faAZ0tbymwFLJmoDfiGvtcVwV2QV9t49slPifIyo DwFXndVFk6w7nbjzMDRW5KTVlCURvh/V0xY+8Yu6t34oDGRCbkffzKC6JytNkSia IvXaMm74JGsqxmZWjC3vlFghvPi6byhdLV04/pUptOBWoLrThOA= =0vm3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 24 09:22:12 2019 Received: (at 36517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2019 13:22:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Vzf-0006yE-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:22:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1Vzc-0006xz-NU for 36517@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:22:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1VzX-0001q9-FY; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:22:03 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=56112 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i1VzW-0003gS-Ie; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:22:03 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:22:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:14:40 -0400") Message-ID: <87ef1ay9za.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517 Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Jakob, zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Oh, I see. To me that=E2=80=99s completely orthogonal to =E2=80=98guix d= eploy=E2=80=99 though, >> in that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98guix depl= oy=E2=80=99 should use the >> same code for that. >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Yeah, I believe it would be safe to close this once the code for 'guix > deploy' and 'guix system reconfigure' is unified. I opened this under > the impression that the two would remain separate and individual changes > would need to occur for both. Unless I=E2=80=99m mistaken, this bug can be closed now, right? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 24 13:44:07 2019 Received: (at 36517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2019 17:44:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1a58-0001ZN-P8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:44:07 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:62127) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1a57-0001ZD-Cs for 36517@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:44:05 -0400 Received: from Upsilon (mobile-166-172-60-98.mycingular.net [166.172.60.98]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x7OHi171011422 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:44:04 GMT From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87ef1ay9za.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:44:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ef1ay9za.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:22:01 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftlq7927.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517 Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Unless I=E2=80=99m mistaken, this bug can be closed now, right? Yep! This can be closed now, since we're running the unified code and we have another ticket for tracking this in 'guix system reconfigure'. Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl1hd2AACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2VqaLw/9F7YSpqdbyOJZNA9129Y92xUYSEF9TkGb2H8YZj2bhe+YuSCrO/jy2w54 8bFlYRK0hFoh0CNEm8cPfSYlqj/9N9T4XEsKm2pxGjqnYBDxrga5ZmpaIRLxFimB u24txjM4nmOrB5erdzqGYHlD1OFlj4ibGbG2XV9mQ1yZH+6bgETQvT+ZsqAMvkvq /DdQb+xn8admYQxAqPPTOwEvl/hZ3esweiWZQGZobEEsFOUJ4+bhXJhpv3ENud/k q/fcBmL2Iqa+/QOeHhLXo8j1wImMeZSTv8mAcMbabIfIIOcxJfuEujij5+ULme0l 98nOQ35V7ieRmQzHvMEag02TnQN8qe61iAfkdLieyt0BYj1WnZ45Pb4hEXHAMsoq QVHbWEveVfNnJDPxLNX+ApL7zj80+EKNs92XD5FwOgHhqxww7VMubRqXbja/KfYv WEPJLZvtT9nICkTtv9RxAqYBAdSZluDU/25YkvFmYJqKUoWJRWy7FTS7XQds2MOE ieY6MWlbuK6jgd4kxMekXAaUv8J4f7TgkZ5dyPywZPRYua0EOzocLmEhpAPNNZvD s1fdp3vl6YnA2jJd2xFNhsYGk3QymZz0QeHEAfhzlRa+JPZdvCXc2m+E6MzmX+WJ 783pwPHQymUlxTIe2rVQuDVlM4am7wBWYV7PF9u67IUrDvqRKHY= =OGvk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 26 04:19:49 2019 Received: (at 36517-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2019 08:19:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2AE8-00044f-UV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2AE7-00044T-SI for 36517-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2AE2-00067y-PU; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:42 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=47230 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2AE2-0007Xm-4y; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:19:42 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87ef1ay9za.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftlq7927.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 Fructidor an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:19:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ftlq7927.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:44:00 -0400") Message-ID: <87ef182vab.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36517-done Cc: 36517-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Unless I=E2=80=99m mistaken, this bug can be closed now, right? > > Yep! This can be closed now, since we're running the unified code and we > have another ticket for tracking this in 'guix system reconfigure'. Alrighty, done! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:27:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator