GNU bug report logs - #36496
[PATCH] Describe the rx notation in the lisp manual

Previous Next

Full log

Message #32 received at 36496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
To: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 36496 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36496: [PATCH] Describe the rx notation in the lisp manual
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 07:59:03 -0400

Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org> writes:

> +(zero-or-more RX...) Match RXs zero or more times.  Alias: *, 0+
> +(one-or-more RX...)  Match RXs one or more times.  Alias: +, 1+
> +(zero-or-one RX...)  Match RXs or the empty string.  Alias: ?, opt, optional

*, +, and ? are not exact aliases of the above: they're always greedy
(as opposed to depending on rx-greedy-flag).  I think it's a bit
confusing to rely on the description of minimal-match and maximal-match
to explain that.

> +(minimal-match RX)  Match RX, with zero-or-more, one-or-more,
> +                zero-or-one, 0+, 1+, opt, and optional
> +                using non-greedy matching.
> +(maximal-match RX)  Match RX, with zero-or-more, one-or-more,
> +                zero-or-one, 0+, 1+, opt, and optional
> +                using greedy matching, which is the default.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.