GNU bug report logs - #36490
26.1; directory-files-recursively breaks when it encounters a directory named "~"

Previous Next

Full log

Message #13 received at 36490 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Erik Hahn <erik_hahn <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 36490 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36490: 26.1;
 directory-files-recursively breaks when it encounters a directory
 named "~"
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 23:08:46 +0200

Actually, the doc string of expand-file-name is either wrong, or the
implementation is.

It says:

---
An initial ‘~/’ expands to your home directory.
An initial ‘~USER/’ expands to USER’s home directory.
---

Assuming the "An initial" refers to the first parameter, then

(expand-file-name "~/" "/tmp/")
=> "/home/larsi/"

works as advertised, but

(expand-file-name "~" "/tmp/")
=> "/home/larsi"

is a different thing: "~" is a perfectly valid file name, so having this
function map that to something else is just...  wrong.

(expand-file-name "~larsi" "/tmp/")
=> "/home/larsi"

is the same: Also wrong and undocumented.

The doc string continues with further confusion:

---
See also the function ‘substitute-in-file-name’.
---

See it for...  what?  For further expansions this function is going to
do?  Fortunately not:

(expand-file-name "$HOME" "/tmp/")
=> "/tmp/$HOME"

So that's probably just meant as "that's also a function that does file
name stuff, but it has nothing to do with this ~ thing we just
discussed"?

So what to do here?  I think the current, undocumented

(expand-file-name "~" "/tmp/")
=> "/home/larsi"

must surely be an error, and that should be fixed instead of the
callers?  Opinions?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.