GNU bug report logs - #36475
[PATCH] Handle 'abbr' and 'acronym' tags in shr.el

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Nicholas Drozd <nicholasdrozd <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:08:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: fixed, patch

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 36475 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicholas Drozd <nicholasdrozd <at> gmail.com>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 36475 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36475: [PATCH] Handle 'abbr' and 'acronym' tags in shr.el
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:17:24 -0500
Let's leave it as a defun for now then, and anyone who objects can
change it later (probably without any consequence). shr-tag-tt does
the same thing, deferring to shr-tag-code, so shr-tag-tt and
shr-tag-acronym can be changed together.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:42 AM Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Nicholas Drozd <nicholasdrozd <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> > It could be, but I don't know that much would be gained. While a
> > defalias would be slightly terser, it would also stick out from the
> > surrounding defuns. I don't have a strong opinion either way. Are
> > there any non-style considerations?
>
> I have no strong opinion either, but using a defalias seems to me the
> better choice. Maybe I'm biased due to the work on Tramp, where a large
> part of the job is keeping backward compatibility with older
> Emacsen. That's why I have a preference to defalias, whenever
> possible. It needs less maintainership attention.
>
> But it is your decision, of course.
>
> Best regards, Michael.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 316 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.