GNU bug report logs - #36403
27.0.50; Trivial image.c bugs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:29:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 27.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #69 received at 36403 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>, 36403 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#36403: 27.0.50; Trivial image.c bugs
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:05:17 +0300
Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-10-04 16:06 +0200] wrote:

> "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie> writes:
>
>> -     (setcdr circ1 circ1)
>> -     (setcdr circ2 circ2)
>> -     (and (equal (image-size spec1 t) (cons 1 1))
>> -          (equal (image-size spec2 t) (cons 1 1))))))
>> +    (setcdr circ1 circ1)
>> +    (setcdr circ2 circ2)
>> +    (should (equal (image-size spec1 t) '(1 . 1)))
>> +    (should (equal (image-size spec2 t) '(1 . 1)))))
>
> (cons 1 1) is not eq to (cons 1 1), but '(1 . 1) may or may not be eq to
> '(1 . 1) (depending on whether compiled or phase of the moon), which may
> be why that code is written that way?  But in this case, I can't see how
> it would make a difference...

It doesn't matter whether the calls to image-size return the same
object.  What matters is that both calls succeed (that they return the
correct result is also nice I guess, if that's what you're into ;).

-- 
Basil




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 222 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.