From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:11:57 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#36360 <36360@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#36360 <36360@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Reply-To: bug#36360 <36360@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:11:57 +0000 retitle 36360 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem reassign 36360 emacs submitter 36360 Sebastian Urban severity 36360 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 12:21:43 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 16:21:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfRiw-0006WI-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:21:43 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfRiv-0006W9-4O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:21:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfRit-0003O9-T5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:21:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfRis-0001VK-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:21:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:44696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfRis-0001TU-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:21:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id r16so14544343wrl.11 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:21:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JFRWqBUBJlwlKcVskXQL3kIxaz6P67J9bl9L7mAt+WM=; b=LJOgZZXQQz/WjQLYMZWKfPudVSPLTb5o2+UebWGV/jNb/n8Gjqjw4Y1/zrlQWni6WV MPUz729z8YGzVj7Wmf/6amlZGY99ter/QxUUkQxIA5sr18s0YCuwTT/b4sJRqme+NEHV DLbEfAdFwwOOuQMnZ2Y+C7mH+2IWS3smUrUDbq/jZUPTnheVmhKuf9XaP9TwbHuDPR/X GvuDLRo2yvIXBxLFS9+rZGOnKIspubBfFPtYFfRkWf/Z9TkMW5uysoQLNZfpjJjRUjXP REo9rbMMszI4vqROQ/CBF5mKPrVE46r/GbK5OiekIpoiwsJtBVjN6aFAm0Qx1os3fqJS kx4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JFRWqBUBJlwlKcVskXQL3kIxaz6P67J9bl9L7mAt+WM=; b=XkfhDtZJvYBeQtZeI5a6ubGOzLylE82VVIwxiINBuPXeAPFhw0TvckHSHn3tK/28an pfOfPqkYkX/+Y54uyXFFethk91earT+3tmGt4S+RMSvVncoIhg90NrdtQoqqtaDxyahz DpsKJP8LPD7LX4Ai8RuQHfdeFXNVCm3784aKWz/Z/47GfIvzHL0Yjm48MAg+gQTW2nRo QgDiULRCJ+pBghNmTUUvNpd4anTNcAiG3HxCKAcGMo8DAK6ZCPBqiELb9UxtaPbfby4s IGzsQQ8p4GpuDxwexnpQ9Qs+gXEys61XuNhQ2B/m8uoyLZrDMDsAnVSNqWAIryGaoRth +x5w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/5DRsMmGja+Y0CGly3a845QF+e2rU+ohoAHXLtw08g2WpUZfw 46q3RYqwCIJLKM7WS5BV5jHE3WCz X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlh85+1YNkPIdvPXtwOgWCNPh0tWnuBz1iR/BgzBnAJauCYIEiJuOfkZ5BJemdixfpznu3Og== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ebc4:: with SMTP id v4mr14495091wrn.113.1561393296264; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:f41:1870:f1b8:ed6d:9890:85f5:2b6d? ([2a00:f41:1870:f1b8:ed6d:9890:85f5:2b6d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm9718040wmq.25.2019.06.24.09.21.34 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:21:35 -0700 (PDT) To: Bug GNU Emacs From: Sebastian Urban Subject: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Message-ID: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:21:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::436 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) 1. After selecting in *Packages* (list-packages) 'ada-mode' and 'svg' (both "available"), their descriptions show "Other versions: builtin." without version number. 2. There are no "built-in" ("Status" column) versions of 'ada-mode' and 'svg' on the package list *Packages*. S. U. In GNU Emacs 26.2 (build 1, i686-w64-mingw32) of 2019-04-13 built on CIRROCUMULUS Repository revision: fd1b34bfba8f3f6298df47c8e10b61530426f749 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 16:03:09 2019 Received: (at 36360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 20:03:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58069 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVBF-0000qm-2L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:03:09 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:11724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVBD-0000qI-Et for 36360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:03:08 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 05453100A48; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:03:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EEB04100944; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:02:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1561406580; bh=DY/Rsyp36u8krDxpwLu4igjFnBBNZnezBDNrsPKr2ug=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XPcfhvQw2UBBSTfWMyfDqBToxG6Au07mMUqHS6xnSyXSVr1gh8yV9KvddCDnQp8tA YBmhI76hLMYpHfPQVRInv38V23ynGaxo4m29T9YQSJ5NsfBOWkBBZwnNYFCKBq7Kmr 3/ch5dgdZSWHwH5yD6QXpLR7A3SaZCe3agGAfRR5d/mkAbBTBhdNyBF8wJSTb/ytlM L1PkhCNsYpPNgdAHFpITjwYu5ImvYlqzSkd+rzeH6rW6yGc6WLPpGhALQanqInL5wL n7N3GNUwnjbLjuLQ2eEp0LFPUwjqsZ1WSfH0OONI16z5TQ+wsijfZx1ert73ysAP+7 onycaBDekbIUQ== Received: from alfajor (69-196-134-84.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.134.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90C14120B37; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:02:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Message-ID: References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:02:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> (Sebastian Urban's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:21:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360 Cc: 36360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Lars, > 2. There are no "built-in" ("Status" column) versions of 'ada-mode' > and 'svg' on the package list *Packages*. I see we have an `svg` package in GNU ELPA and an `svg` package in Emacs. There's no actual conflict, because they are "one and the same", but they're not the same version. A cursory look seems to indicate that the svg.el that comes from Emacs is more up-to-date. Would it make sense to use that one in GNU ELPA (i.e. make `svg` into a `:core` package, built from emacs.git rather than from elpa.git)? The main question seems to be whether Emacs's svg.el works in Emacs-25 and if not whether we should bump up the package-requires or whether we should tweak to code so it's made compatible with Emacs-25. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 16:13:36 2019 Received: (at 36360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 20:13:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVLI-00016H-1x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:36 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVL9-00015v-TI for 36360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:31 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1A63100B4D; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8320A1009AF; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1561407195; bh=2T8VtI8UrkzNayj9iKB+5nHVSEcYWnd4055Y0F23ndc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gH4UBwlbFUdkX6CRummUDhU0Q/TeD8wIMz3ehVwAjf4awx9rcRxSzbO5GevumzrPT 6AiP/QicX+95mDb0svb2zxJrP0aGYalgxu98U/K42IM5Ib8BhLD82CtRhnk9wntxSz K9GYvRaX2udYh7TkwGwIAbpNnyC7f6FRHuhPfES7fJ2IaFgfeS44uMjV2k4rQc+ovS I3+I8x/B9FZt/qYcKZ1ONt9LpaRJoK9WCUsT4l4pMym2LY0jIz1VoM4pDJ5OtH4zvM Xair3zUmjDghYBQsXcIgfvO55Xsob3cLmWFknq1ps+5IOT20DC1F2xUbT8D+CNzPWY 2/J0XJV5aDbJw== Received: from alfajor (69-196-134-84.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.134.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E4EF12000B; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Message-ID: References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> (Sebastian Urban's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:21:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.019 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360 Cc: 36360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > 2. There are no "built-in" ("Status" column) versions of 'ada-mode' > and 'svg' on the package list *Packages*. The patch below fixes it for ada-mode (a similar patch will do that for svg, tho I'd like Lars to choose which version number we want to use there). Do you think it's safe enough for emacs-26 or should I keep it for `master`? Stefan diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/ada-mode.el b/lisp/progmodes/ada-mode.el index 77c1e5e2d8..de323549ed 100644 --- a/lisp/progmodes/ada-mode.el +++ b/lisp/progmodes/ada-mode.el @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ ;; Emmanuel Briot ;; Maintainer: Stephen Leake ;; Keywords: languages ada +;; Version: 4.0 ;; This file is part of GNU Emacs. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 16:14:52 2019 Received: (at 36360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 20:14:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVMa-00018n-JL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:52 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:64112) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVMZ-00018b-7z for 36360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:51 -0400 Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 096784440A0; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F20B44409B; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1561407285; bh=8usSq+WAY2tcEd92iuCX/IrNb8EmScJG5fZBQUIqOB8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TAfEjiv9mHKLfJsetfKIT420OD6VVGL7fSMVe+ZUJf0BU2kPxbEGrnOYsjJQjCZXl Z0Xy31aXVbRoOlD4DOdg8tXWAk35PwSKWm2lm7Soqip2g2pERwzGevifbGQkNMde0c vo6WW9Yca3g8zi9pCo3lhnT6xojDrK1OKyTqzJfDsW5gPQ7RI0JtmClEt4CDP1RSfN nb7M3ujx01LpdlqD5lWF/imuACEQxULdv1cRL5XIwxXXLWFpmnFcUw2wamI5m5+Sxk ydFi3bNJ75sygUJ3JiHYFc47f2UcLYAtlV5Jbcg3BagdbdhiRtVR/ncratR6jCAao2 VsfTYP0NrmA+A== Received: from alfajor (69-196-134-84.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.134.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D86DC1201FF; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Message-ID: References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:02:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360 Cc: 36360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > I see we have an `svg` package in GNU ELPA and an `svg` package > in Emacs. There's no actual conflict, because they are "one and the > same", but they're not the same version. BTW, the one in elpa.git has version "0.2" and the one in emacs.git has no "Version:". Whatever we decide to do, we'll need to give a version number to the one in Emacs. Should we go with 0.3 or should we leave some more room between the two? Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 16:15:21 2019 Received: (at 36360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 20:15:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVN2-0001So-Sh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVN1-0001QS-5v for 36360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:19 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVMx-0007HD-2o; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:15:17 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVVdZEXHjVZ0OYpMUpl j6xBUWsL3gelAAACPklEQVQ4jVWUsXbrIAyGVQJ7CTc7lc0erLLn+JCdgnn/V6mEHTdXnqJP0i8J CKTORqmX3lLp/MvAAx46w09q0VnXNygmG216K1qboiH1RmRvveAS0KPptMGjc1brLVpLdA/L19rR GCr62TpA782y3fw9qGISEbEc9S6l2O/83UC5WEeWGtMEcB8Jmv0Q2R9pWNdAxL9VATCSyMAdILpo NzDQ7OhBLIkEUELg8Mh+F0c0NZ4XIFX0RD92FHJWNKSpB9B6RQWTgDgyxo5KhhQqInqOPyT6AeLE flSW4qtTHrBDBhsErLvsDriZzMAPYCm1MwM0r91BfYE2xKUUCHiqHfCO2rsGeZxZnGeQgaVbKFxs aARQwBlOJmiizQtlgMEXI6Fj2WY0JRpWYSjm2faBJRg0+2ewCzZHF/aCKTBGyI+cEex1drRHi7FP bGXAti+OS4z4rDlBQF02bZIZmzgSdrB8hxA4gTeR8xtwVxPmKiInWXFk/Jvmuj2HvD79Am6TWia/ y+9gZFB0fjG+Gun3PYP3ydd53UKHA8x/IPn6nF8Zw70DdcHNK7P75xP0VqfV4Lfnyf8SBPQl1KAM vksLSKl6/oLy+jX1AHw+31j4q/P/QC4l8hPj72j3DxBecFJnrVVuxwGmGhZf5T08Xkn8vqxdv65+ 1DvBPA9QwydGruaPM8/jzNmuM+EHV0P5w4DzaBmgxWlBwud+02XIARb8qSxyUf5Y5Ev8hh9Xjg/1 bRTI/C4dfn1iYwn0g8i6fgEmpsN4L1MvjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:15:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:02:58 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: > The main question seems to be whether Emacs's svg.el works in Emacs-25 > and if not whether we should bump up the package-requires or whether we > should tweak to code so it's made compatible with E [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360 Cc: 36360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: > The main question seems to be whether Emacs's svg.el works in Emacs-25 > and if not whether we should bump up the package-requires or whether we > should tweak to code so it's made compatible with Emacs-25. I have made no effort to have svg.el be backwards-compatible with previous Emacs versions, so it's probably not? I can see a when-let* in there, for instance... That can be rewritten trivially, but I don't know whether there's anything else that's "modern" in there. :-) Didn't see anything on a cursory scan. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 16:15:50 2019 Received: (at 36360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 20:15:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVNW-0001xD-Aq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:50 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVNV-0001vm-5a for 36360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:49 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfVNS-0007HJ-9q; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:15:48 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVVdZEXHjVZ0OYpMUpl j6xBUWsL3gelAAACPklEQVQ4jVWUsXbrIAyGVQJ7CTc7lc0erLLn+JCdgnn/V6mEHTdXnqJP0i8J CKTORqmX3lLp/MvAAx46w09q0VnXNygmG216K1qboiH1RmRvveAS0KPptMGjc1brLVpLdA/L19rR GCr62TpA782y3fw9qGISEbEc9S6l2O/83UC5WEeWGtMEcB8Jmv0Q2R9pWNdAxL9VATCSyMAdILpo NzDQ7OhBLIkEUELg8Mh+F0c0NZ4XIFX0RD92FHJWNKSpB9B6RQWTgDgyxo5KhhQqInqOPyT6AeLE flSW4qtTHrBDBhsErLvsDriZzMAPYCm1MwM0r91BfYE2xKUUCHiqHfCO2rsGeZxZnGeQgaVbKFxs aARQwBlOJmiizQtlgMEXI6Fj2WY0JRpWYSjm2faBJRg0+2ewCzZHF/aCKTBGyI+cEex1drRHi7FP bGXAti+OS4z4rDlBQF02bZIZmzgSdrB8hxA4gTeR8xtwVxPmKiInWXFk/Jvmuj2HvD79Am6TWia/ y+9gZFB0fjG+Gun3PYP3ydd53UKHA8x/IPn6nF8Zw70DdcHNK7P75xP0VqfV4Lfnyf8SBPQl1KAM vksLSKl6/oLy+jX1AHw+31j4q/P/QC4l8hPj72j3DxBecFJnrVVuxwGmGhZf5T08Xkn8vqxdv65+ 1DvBPA9QwydGruaPM8/jzNmuM+EHV0P5w4DzaBmgxWlBwud+02XIARb8qSxyUf5Y5Ev8hh9Xjg/1 bRTI/C4dfn1iYwn0g8i6fgEmpsN4L1MvjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:15:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:14:44 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: > BTW, the one in elpa.git has version "0.2" and the one in emacs.git has > no "Version:". Whatever we decide to do, we'll need to give a version > number to the one in Emacs. > Should we go with 0.3 [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360 Cc: 36360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: > BTW, the one in elpa.git has version "0.2" and the one in emacs.git has > no "Version:". Whatever we decide to do, we'll need to give a version > number to the one in Emacs. > Should we go with 0.3 or should we leave some more room between the two? Go to 1.0? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 17:19:05 2019 Received: (at 36360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 21:19:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfWMj-0004xL-8s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:19:05 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:19423) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfWMh-0004wH-D0 for 36360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:19:03 -0400 Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 574A081162; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:18:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4D4FF80E0D; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:18:55 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1561411135; bh=g0JeAt2gVIfq6n5OySGWAlZMd50Cld5ynbiqgLgm41o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EFY8u/FmsEm6htJAdOt7Bgqy8YYlsrHWXjUklv/9NWCeiVtcMX7PztZREN2F3xdLn 9ngXeDGMVXsO+JwtNRVBw9yArICj2mj1yjNk/qKdI2opwBiBNEMh+rIip+uiUxqvQ8 YGw88ORj1eMFdiqhoMx1/iRPbLEvx08zp1Tvm3npe7mOq3X5yXOTL56Rc60/gmKUGM k3Fc4gDD0wmP4nisVzGd6SMjpdobu7acNCsOk0OY7lbjR7sbglxu/xY9iAapBKFIWQ DlRJBLJ40FoOCglUjvUpjGYZFc+aaEHhqV1orVo1Ylm3WDCp73WNP92LsNVHCRx7aA lSS2jJcNevp6A== Received: from alfajor (69-196-134-84.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.134.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13F141201D7; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:18:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Message-ID: References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:18:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:15:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.063 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360 Cc: 36360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >> BTW, the one in elpa.git has version "0.2" and the one in emacs.git has >> no "Version:". Whatever we decide to do, we'll need to give a version >> number to the one in Emacs. >> Should we go with 0.3 or should we leave some more room between the two? > > Go to 1.0? OK, done, thanks Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 06 12:18:04 2019 Received: (at 36360-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2019 16:18:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjnO0-00014X-0D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:18:04 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:22150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hjnNy-00013y-3Y for 36360-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:18:02 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AA4DA100955; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 12:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8E933100641; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 12:17:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1562429874; bh=5zH6Pgx2DwIOEiGPrBYWuOUkX4DzitAP865JDHECJbQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=BB5Z5sLEzAqekT08HAWnqPPir7Y/v8WF/0Vd+VzOpp+iBjkkPVV9gHPpLEwKU2Ugt HYDXVQDZVhP0LTiVnFeNOpgsHzHBl/oJzqiIIOfWFieygrBXO44V38uStzz5m0erD7 eggRvkrKPxNVY5+zWobp32mVGhH/tYgw5qYKWQiUi1Uj+aIpcuLhbN6Wzwq9VWDO10 VYQJ0tAGJEJPK1iNN9P5T6++QUlHX6oGi3XWPS8BXAHV6KOI2QAUK29n9G2pcxqNuB d5aid2QgQjcNa82PfAD2GhthsOQ/0QeOOm1OLXJosMgjfKBuYxhasXceBDi7YXqnAg e2Ca71Jh2Vm+g== Received: from pastel (76-10-138-228.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.138.228]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04D61120BFC; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 12:17:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Sebastian Urban Subject: Re: bug#36360: 'ada-mode' & 'svg' pkgs version number & presence problem Message-ID: References: <86ea948e-606b-34bd-879f-44e1c9b12146@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:17:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:13:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.128 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36360-done Cc: 36360-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Version: 26.3 I just pushed a fix for those two to `emacs-26`. Stefan From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:11:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator