GNU bug report logs -
#36359
'sentence-end-base' 3 additional symbols
Previous Next
Reported by: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: fixed
Fixed in version 27.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 36359 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 36359 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I just wanted to suggest to perhaps add this:
- '>' - GREATER-THAN SIGN
(codepoint 62, #o76, #x3e),
- '»' - RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
(codepoint 187, #o273, #xbb),
- '›' - SINGLE RIGHT-POINTING ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
(codepoint 8250, #o20072, #x203a),
to the value of 'sentence-end-base', like this for example:
-"[.?!…‽][]\"'”’)}]*"
+"[.?!…‽][]\"'”’»›)}>]*"
And perhaps update example in section "15.8(INFO) Regular Expression
Example" of Emacs manual.
S. U.
In GNU Emacs 26.2 (build 1, i686-w64-mingw32)
of 2019-04-13 built on CIRROCUMULUS
Repository revision: fd1b34bfba8f3f6298df47c8e10b61530426f749
Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 01:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I just wanted to suggest to perhaps add this:
>
> - '>' - GREATER-THAN SIGN
> (codepoint 62, #o76, #x3e),
> - '»' - RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
> (codepoint 187, #o273, #xbb),
> - '›' - SINGLE RIGHT-POINTING ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
> (codepoint 8250, #o20072, #x203a),
>
> to the value of 'sentence-end-base', like this for example:
>
> -"[.?!…‽][]\"'”’)}]*"
> +"[.?!…‽][]\"'”’»›)}>]*"
I can see » being useful here, but do people use > in these
circumstances?
And › I've never seen before -- what language is that used in?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:08:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> I can see » being useful here, (...)
So, I'll take it as done.
> (...) but do people use > in these circumstances?
Well, I was thinking about writing them in LaTeX documents, where (if
font encoding is OT4 or T1) you can get '»' by typing '>>'. If this
is not enough, then skip it, I'll set it manually.
> And › I've never seen before -- what language is that used in?
And this is (I think) used for inner quotes, just like '’',
i.e. « ... ‹ ... › ... ».
Here is short thread about it:
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/fr-citations-imbriqu%C3%A9es-quotation-within-a-quotation-typography.1061025/
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> (...) but do people use > in these circumstances?
>
> Well, I was thinking about writing them in LaTeX documents, where (if
> font encoding is OT4 or T1) you can get '»' by typing '>>'. If this
> is not enough, then skip it, I'll set it manually.
But you end up with » in the buffer, so I don't quite follow how
having > in sentence-end-base is useful...
>> And › I've never seen before -- what language is that used in?
>
> And this is (I think) used for inner quotes, just like '’',
> i.e. « ... ‹ ... › ... ».
Right:
« La Constitution du 3 septembre 1791 proclame la nécessité d'‹ une instruction
publique, commune à tous les citoyens, gratuite à l'égard des parties
d'enseignement indispensables pour tous les hommes ›. »
That example is also interesting because it has the full stop before the
», while I was wondering whether the French did that (or put it after
the »), so I guess that answers that.
So unless anybody objects, I'm adding › and » to the regexp.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug marked as fixed in version 27.1, send any further explanations to
36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #21 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> (...) you can get '»' by typing '>>'.
>
> But you end up with » in the buffer, so I don't quite follow how
> having > in sentence-end-base is useful...
You will get » but in generated .PDF, in .TEX it'll be >>. Just like
'' in .TEX and ” in .PDF.
> So unless anybody objects, I'm adding › and » to the regexp.
Thanks, but I'm worried a bit about spaces they put before closing
quotes. In the example quotation from your message, at the end, there
is "DOT SPACE 'RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK'" - regexp
won't recognize this. Perhaps update to this will do:
"[.?!…‽] ?[]\"'”’»›)}]*"
^^-these were added
But then I don't know how people who use these quotes, actually use
them, i.e. with or without space? Because for example: gutenberg.org
-> bookshelves -> Français -> any category/book -> Plain Text (UTF-8),
doesn't use space, as far as I know.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:41:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #24 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> writes:
> But then I don't know how people who use these quotes, actually use
> them, i.e. with or without space? Because for example: gutenberg.org
> -> bookshelves -> Français -> any category/book -> Plain Text (UTF-8),
> doesn't use space, as far as I know.
Yeah, I thought it looked pretty strange with the spaces, too, so unless
any French people speak up and want to have that added, I think we can
just leave it as it is.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #27 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> (...) unless any French people speak up and want to have that added,
> I think we can just leave it as it is.
I agree.
So to sum things up, » and › were added, while > I'll set on my own,
until one day someone else will add another argument.
If yes, then I'll consider this thread as closed.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 01 Aug 2019 13:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #30 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> So to sum things up, » and › were added, while > I'll set
> on my own, until one day someone else will add another
> argument.
Just to clear up any doubts, can I get a confirmation on
this, because I'm not sure whether I should consider it done
or not.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36359
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 01 Aug 2019 13:30:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #33 received at 36359 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> So to sum things up, » and › were added, while > I'll set
>> on my own, until one day someone else will add another
>> argument.
>
> Just to clear up any doubts, can I get a confirmation on
> this, because I'm not sure whether I should consider it done
> or not.
Your summation was correct.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 294 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.