GNU bug report logs - #36337
26.1; XBM images are sometimes not displayed correctly

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Markus Triska <triska <at> metalevel.at>

Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:16:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Found in version 26.1

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 36337 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36337 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, triska <at> metalevel.at
Subject: Re: bug#36337: 26.1; XBM images are sometimes not displayed correctly
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 16:26:16 +0000
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:29 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:05:55 +0000
> > Cc: 36337 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > This is easy enough to fix by rewriting the bool vector, but that's
> > potentially very slow (on debug builds), so maybe we shouldn't do
> > that?
> >
> > Does the attached patch work for you?
>
> Thanks, but I really hope there's a more elegant solution.

I thought there had to be, but I've yet to think of anything that's
unequivocally better.

My suggestion would be to expand `substring' to work on bool vectors,
then building a vector of bool vectors and using the existing code for
that case. Less code in image.c, plus a new utility function that
might be generally useful. (However, do we want to encourage people to
use bool vectors?)

I don't think performance is an issue, though, and you might disagree.

> If not,
> maybe we should simply require that both width and height be an
> integral multiple of 8 in this case.

Why would you require the height to be a multiple of 8?




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 299 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.