GNU bug report logs - #36230
[PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 36230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Baptiste Strazzulla <bstrazzull <at> hotmail.fr>
To: "36230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <36230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Fw: [bug#36230] [PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:35:10 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Second attempt. I hope everything is at it's right place this time.

Regards


________________________________________
From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Baptiste Strazzulla
Cc: 36230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#36230] [PATCH] Add emacs-multi-term

Hello,

Baptiste Strazzulla <bstrazzull <at> hotmail.fr> skribis:

> From 3118853b54988c68828c5e7e266d4959151b64cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zzull <bstrazzull <at> hotmail.fr>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 22:32:19 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-multi-term
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-multi-term): New variable

[...]

> +    (arguments
> +     `(#:phases
> +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +         ;; FIXME: `patch-el-files' crashes with the following error:
> +         ;; unable to locate "zsh".

Then I think you should add zsh as an input, such that ‘patch-el-files’
can modify the .el file to refer to zsh by its absolute file name.

> +    (description
> +     "By default, term.el provides a great terminal emulator in Emacs.  But it
> +lacks the following:

Could you replace this description by one that says what
emacs-multi-term is/does, rather than what term.el doesn’t do well?  :-)

See
<https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Synopses-and-Descriptions.html>.

Thank you!

Ludo’.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-multi-term.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.