Subject: RE: bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms

From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 08:38:54 -0700 (PDT)

How does this kind of thing work with an enclosing `cl-flet' or similar that redefines `memq' or whatever?  Or in a file that redefines `memq' or whatever using `defun' or similar?

(But I guess the same problem exists in the current code, wrt `eq' etc.?)