Subject: Re: bug#36139: [PATCH] Make better use of the switch op in cond forms

From: Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 10:38:25 +0200

8 juni 2019 kl. 17.38 skrev Drew Adams <[email-masked]>:
> 
> How does this kind of thing work with an enclosing `cl-flet' or similar that redefines `memq' or whatever?  Or in a file that redefines `memq' or whatever using `defun' or similar?

`cl-flet' works by macro-expansion, not by lexical rebinding of the function value, so it should be reasonably safe.
monotonic