GNU bug report logs - #36126
[PATCH] Add ghc-validation.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36126: closed ([PATCH] Add ghc-validation.)
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:58:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:57:05 +0200
with message-id <87imsk5t0u.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#36126] [PATCH] Add ghc-validation.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36126,
regarding [PATCH] Add ghc-validation.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
36126: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36126
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add ghc-validation.
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 06:51:52 -0500

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello all,

The version bump pushes guix refresh over the 300-package line. Given
that and the fact that there are dependencies on older versions in the
tree, would it be better to give the newer version a special name
instead, or did I make the correct choice here?

Guix packages are a new foray for me, so I imagine something will be
wrong. Did my best to split into proper dependency order though, and
ready to touch up.

Cheers,

Jacob.

[0004-gnu-ghc-ansi-terminal-Update-to-0.9.1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0003-gnu-ghc-ansi-wl-pprint-Use-ghc-ansi-terminal-0.8.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0002-gnu-Add-ghc-ansi-terminal-0.8.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0005-gnu-Add-ghc-concurrent-output.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0001-gnu-Add-ghc-wl-pprint-annotated.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0006-gnu-Add-ghc-hedgehog.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0007-gnu-Add-ghc-validation.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 11 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36126-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#36126] [PATCH] Add ghc-validation.
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:57:05 +0200

Hello Jacob,

Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> The version bump pushes guix refresh over the 300-package line. Given
> that and the fact that there are dependencies on older versions in the
> tree, would it be better to give the newer version a special name
> instead, or did I make the correct choice here?

I think you did it right.  :-)

> Guix packages are a new foray for me, so I imagine something will be
> wrong. Did my best to split into proper dependency order though, and
> ready to touch up.

I applied all 7 patches to ‘master’ (I added a copyright line for you).
It’s above the 300-package line as you write, but these packages build
fairly quickly, so I think it’s OK.

Thanks for the patch set, and apologies for the delay!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.