GNU bug report logs - #36110
find-dired not sorted on any field nor provides a way

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 23:37:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Merged with 29513, 36123

Found in version 25.2

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #35 received at 36110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 36110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#36110: find-dired not sorted on any field nor provides a way
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:18:53 +0300
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:40:11 -0400
> Cc: 36110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > +@code{'("-exec ls -ld @{@} +" . "-ld")}
> 
> Oh, I see you've changed it to the "+" form.
> It looks like this does give sorted output, but I find it surprising.
> Is it assured?

It is assured because the GNU Find's documentation says this '+'
causes the command line to be created by appending the file names,
like xargs does.  However, problems should be expected when the number
of files becomes very large, subject to limitations of the target
platform.

> Anyway, this issue has been very recently fixed in bug#29513
> (of which this is a duplicate) via find-dired-refine-function.
> So I suggest not documenting the above.

We could document both ways.

Btw, the commit which fixed bug#29513 didn't call out the change in
NEWS, let alone in the manual, so we should definitely improve the
docs regarding this issue anyway.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 342 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.