GNU bug report logs -
#36093
[PATCH 0/2] 'guix pack --entry-point' and Singularity service
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 20:53:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hello,
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> skribis:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:01:15 +0200
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> + ,@(if entry-point
>> + `(;; This one if for Singularity 2.x.
>> + "-p"
>> + ,(string-append
>> + "/.singularity.d/actions/run s 777 0 0 "
>> + (relative-file-name "/.singularity.d/actions"
>> + (string-append #$profile "/"
>> + entry-point)))
>> +
>> + ;; This one is for Singularity 3.x.
>> + "-p"
>> + ,(string-append
>> + "/.singularity.d/runscript s 777 0 0 "
>> + (relative-file-name "/.singularity.d"
>> + (string-append #$profile "/"
>> + entry-point))))
>
> Hmm, 777 (anyone can write)? It it necessary?
For a symlink it doesn’t matter, AIUI.
> Also, in general, do we conflate "squashfs" and "singularity"? It has been
> that way in guix/scripts/pack.scm's squashfs-image before this patch already
> and a few extra files can't hurt, but we could also just provide a
> function "singularity-image" or something.
Yes, we do conflate Singularity and Squashfs, but I think there’s no
other “container tool” that uses Squashfs anyway.
We could rename it to “singularity”, but it turns out Singularity 3.x
has its own image format unimaginatively called SIF, so perhaps we’re
better off with the status quo.
Thoughts? Ricardo?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 41 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.