GNU bug report logs -
#36079
Source location information missing from identifiers
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Robert,
> Working on Guix, I encountered the following:
>
> Within a guix checkout, I edited gnu/packages/haskell.scm, accidentally
> making a Haskell comment:
>
> (arguments
> `(#:tests? #f)) -- sporadic failure: https://github.com/fpco/streaming-commons/issues/49
>
> Then I tried to keep working on my in-development package, and was able to trace
> the `guix build` error back to the following:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guild compile ../modules/postgrest.scm
> ;;; note: source file /home/rob/guix/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
> ;;; newer than compiled /home/rob/guix/gnu/packages/haskell.go
> ;;; note: source file /home/rob/guix/gnu/packages/haskell.scm
> ;;; newer than compiled /run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/haskell.go
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
> Syntax error:
> unknown location: package: invalid field specifier in form —-
This error is produced by the “package” macro, which is of this form:
(package
(field value)
(another-field its-value)
…)
The macro has a number of valid field names and it tries to do some
simple validation. That’s where the error comes from. When “--” is
encountered it is in the position of a field, so the macro tries to be
helpful and reports that “--” is not a valid way to specify a field.
This error message is not produced by Guile.
> There are number of ways the error output could be improved. Ideally, I’d
> like to see the offending line of gnu/packages/haskell.scm pin-pointed,
> and/or the start of the enclosing package definition.
I agree that this would be nice. Let’s move this to the Guix bug
tracker.
--
Ricardo
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 349 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.