GNU bug report logs - #36071
[PATCH] gnu: Add leela-zero.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 36071 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Guillaume LE VAILLANT <glv <at> posteo.net>, 36071 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#36071] [PATCH] gnu: Add leela-zero.
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 12:38:14 +0200

Hi,

Thank you for the package.

On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 23:03, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> a écrit :
> >
> >> Does the game run at all if we don’t download additional network
> >> weight data?
> >>
> >> There’s a debate as to whether trained neural network parameters can
> >> be considered “source”: <https://lwn.net/Articles/760142/>.
> >

[...]

> My point is about whether these trained neural network data are
> something that we could distribute per the FSDG.

[...]

>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903634

In addition, the thread on debian-devel exposes arguments (summarized by LWN).
See there:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00153.html


> Perhaps we could do the same, but I’d like to hear what others think.

I need myself to digest the issue.
Hum? FSF has never risen the issue---or I am not aware of.

Aside the practical discussion about this package---thank you for the
work!---, there is a real concern about Reproducibility and Freedom
with the weights of statistical models. However, this is perhaps not
so far from free client / proprietary database situation.

Well, it should be better to discuss this concern on
guix-devel---risking bikeshedding. :-)
At least to collect contradictory arguments.


All the best,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.