From unknown Tue Jun 24 06:51:32 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#3600 <3600@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#3600 <3600@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer Reply-To: bug#3600 <3600@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:51:32 +0000 retitle 3600 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer reassign 3600 emacs submitter 3600 "Drew Adams" severity 3600 normal thanks From drew.adams@oracle.com Wed Jun 17 12:44:08 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 17 Jun 2009 19:44:08 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5HJi3u2022384 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:44:04 -0700 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:45774) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MH13B-0006J2-Hr for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:44:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MH139-0000Ig-SO for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:44:01 -0400 Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:56929) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MH139-0000IF-7c for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:43:59 -0400 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5HJisca006843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:44:55 GMT Received: from abhmt006.oracle.com (abhmt006.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5HJhx0R019827 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:43:59 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.73.196) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:43:52 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:44:07 -0700 Message-ID: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acnvg/pEZUqc8UcVRGm7B8eNvP3ndA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: abhmt006.oracle.com [141.146.116.15] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A010203.4A394779.01AE:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) Dunno if there is a bug here, beyond possibly improving the doc string. In general, I have a question about the code. The code imposes this as one of the conditions for fitting the window to the buffer: (or (not (frame-parameter frame 'minibuffer)) (let ((mini-window (minibuffer-window frame))) (or (null mini-window) (not (eq frame (window-frame mini-window))) (< (nth 3 edges) (nth 1 (window-edges mini-window))) (> (nth 1 edges) (frame-parameter frame 'menu-bar-lines))))) I don't understand the last condition (>). At the least, this condition seems to be missing from the doc string: "Do nothing if the buffer contains more lines than the present window height, or if some of the window's contents are scrolled out of view, or if shrinking this window would also shrink another window, or if the window is the only window of its frame." What is that last condition (>) for? What is the relation between the number of menu-bar-lines and the `Top' position of the window? And doesn't this code raise an error if the `menu-bar-lines' parameter is nil? Should it really be doing that? In GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-05-24 on SOFT-MJASON Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)' From rudalics@gmx.at Thu Jun 18 03:09:07 2009 Received: (at 3600) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Jun 2009 10:09:07 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MIXEDBDN, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n5IA915w006188 for <3600@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:09:03 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2009 10:08:55 -0000 Received: from 62-47-35-144.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.35.144]) [62.47.35.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 12:08:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19OwAUdwmxOLK5r5HxzDwG21LRlJeq3BkQj4O9O8m BlBpOuNS+kDgmX Message-ID: <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:07:35 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Adams , 3600@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060809040806080908080203" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.65,0.66 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060809040806080908080203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > The code imposes this as one of the conditions for fitting the window > to the buffer: > > (or (not (frame-parameter frame 'minibuffer)) > (let ((mini-window (minibuffer-window frame))) > (or (null mini-window) > (not (eq frame (window-frame mini-window))) > (< (nth 3 edges) (nth 1 (window-edges mini-window))) > (> (nth 1 edges) (frame-parameter frame 'menu-bar-lines))))) > > I don't understand the last condition (>). At the least, this > condition seems to be missing from the doc string: > > "Do nothing if the buffer contains more lines than the present window > height, or if some of the window's contents are scrolled out of view, > or if shrinking this window would also shrink another window, or if > the window is the only window of its frame." > > What is that last condition (>) for? What is the relation between the > number of menu-bar-lines and the `Top' position of the window? I guess it's a poor man's attempt to make sure that there's some other window above or below the one to shrink. > And doesn't this code raise an error if the `menu-bar-lines' parameter > is nil? Should it really be doing that? Looks like a bug. Could you try the attached patch? Since this code hasn't been touched for quite some time we can't fix it for Emacs 23.1 though. martin --------------060809040806080908080203 Content-Type: text/plain; name="window.el.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="window.el.diff" *** window.el.~1.180.~ 2009-05-07 11:10:52.000000000 +0200 --- window.el 2009-06-18 11:31:13.234375000 +0200 *************** *** 1520,1527 **** (when (null window) (setq window (selected-window))) (let* ((frame (window-frame window)) ! (mini (frame-parameter frame 'minibuffer)) ! (edges (window-edges window))) (if (and (not (eq window (frame-root-window frame))) (window-safely-shrinkable-p window) (pos-visible-in-window-p (point-min) window) --- 1520,1526 ---- (when (null window) (setq window (selected-window))) (let* ((frame (window-frame window)) ! (mini (frame-parameter frame 'minibuffer))) (if (and (not (eq window (frame-root-window frame))) (window-safely-shrinkable-p window) (pos-visible-in-window-p (point-min) window) *************** *** 1530,1539 **** (let ((mini-window (minibuffer-window frame))) (or (null mini-window) (not (eq frame (window-frame mini-window))) ! (< (nth 3 edges) ! (nth 1 (window-edges mini-window))) ! (> (nth 1 edges) ! (frame-parameter frame 'menu-bar-lines)))))) (fit-window-to-buffer window (window-height window))))) (defun kill-buffer-and-window () --- 1529,1536 ---- (let ((mini-window (minibuffer-window frame))) (or (null mini-window) (not (eq frame (window-frame mini-window))) ! (/= (window-height window) ! (window-height (frame-root-window frame))))))) (fit-window-to-buffer window (window-height window))))) (defun kill-buffer-and-window () --------------060809040806080908080203-- From drew.adams@oracle.com Thu Jun 18 10:23:29 2009 Received: (at 3600) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Jun 2009 17:23:29 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com (acsinet12.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5IHNPt7013746 for <3600@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:23:26 -0700 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5IHNGN7022241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:23:18 GMT Received: from abhmt008.oracle.com (abhmt008.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5IHNMhT010651; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:23:22 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:23:15 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'martin rudalics'" , <3600@debbugs.gnu.org> References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> Subject: RE: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:23:16 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> Thread-Index: Acnv/NRW1SHyOtxhR7aUsldDe2S+9AAPEbEg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: abhmt008.oracle.com [141.146.116.17] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A09020A.4A3A7804.01B9:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 > I guess it's a poor man's attempt to make sure that there's some other > window above or below the one to shrink. > > > And doesn't this code raise an error if the `menu-bar-lines' > > parameter is nil? Should it really be doing that? > > Looks like a bug. Could you try the attached patch? Since this code > hasn't been touched for quite some time we can't fix it for Emacs 23.1 > though. I don't know how to try it. What recipe do you suggest? I didn't try anything before; I was just perusing the code, and I wondered what it was trying to do. From rudalics@gmx.at Fri Jun 19 01:51:37 2009 Received: (at 3600) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Jun 2009 08:51:37 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n5J8pWSu016394 for <3600@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:51:34 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2009 08:51:26 -0000 Received: from 62-47-32-51.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.32.51]) [62.47.32.51] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 10:51:26 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18vbfR+RRkvhUR99IYZk5ZYLCr+wl1UQ7hgw7S3R7 C0sbBd33QiIfc7 Message-ID: <4A3B518B.20806@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:51:23 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Adams CC: 3600@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 > I don't know how to try it. What recipe do you suggest? Apply the patch and either remake emacs or put the code of the patched `shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer' into your .emacs and wait till it starts barking. And don't forget to tell me if it doesn't bark at you for a couple of weeks. Then we can install it. > I didn't try anything before; I was just perusing the code, and I wondered what > it was trying to do. The only way to understand such code is by comparing the original code with the present one and, if they differ, go through the revisions, look at the ChangeLogs, and maybe scan emacs-devel and friends for errors reported wrt that code. martin From drew.adams@oracle.com Fri Jun 19 14:23:46 2009 Received: (at 3600) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Jun 2009 21:23:47 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from rgminet11.oracle.com (rcsinet11.oracle.com [148.87.113.123]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5JLNhws022870 for <3600@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:23:44 -0700 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rgminet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5JLOfSI004704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:24:43 GMT Received: from abhmt006.oracle.com (abhmt006.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n5JLNeT5032561; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:23:40 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.177.54) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:23:33 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'martin rudalics'" Cc: <3600@debbugs.gnu.org> References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> <4A3B518B.20806@gmx.at> Subject: RE: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:23:36 -0700 Message-ID: <72CF189B361D4D1E8D8E3FED0AFEEDA0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4A3B518B.20806@gmx.at> Thread-Index: Acnwu1kHaRgDpQ3JQsGvkURPSnuIAAAaEe/g X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: abhmt006.oracle.com [141.146.116.15] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090206.4A3C01D6.0175:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 > > I don't know how to try it. What recipe do you suggest? > > Apply the patch and either remake emacs or put the code of the patched > `shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer' into your .emacs and > wait till it starts barking. And don't forget to tell me if it > doesn't bark at you for a couple of weeks. Then we can install it. I think I'll pass. The affected part of the code is something that I will probably never run into, let alone within a couple of weeks. The use case for that code path is something that someone else will need to test, if it is tested at all. > > I didn't try anything before; I was just perusing the > > code, and I wondered what it was trying to do. > > The only way to understand such code is by comparing the original code > with the present one and, if they differ, go through the > revisions, look at the ChangeLogs, and maybe scan emacs-devel and > friends for errors reported wrt that code. I think you misunderstood me. I was speaking about perusing the original code, not yours. I was saying that I didn't run into a problem trying to do something. I didn't run into a problem at all. I was simply browsing the (original) code and noticed that it seemed strange. That's all. I have no problem with your fix. (And I personally have no problem if no fix is applied.) From rudalics@gmx.at Sat Jun 20 01:09:42 2009 Received: (at 3600) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 20 Jun 2009 08:09:43 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n5K89ZnP029354 for <3600@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:09:36 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2009 08:09:29 -0000 Received: from 62-47-36-173.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.173]) [62.47.36.173] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2009 10:09:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1831StZLFk39bWw4oH3/xPnWpm7kJ6e5IA8DalYkv WxWzqB+rIpuPIZ Message-ID: <4A3C98F9.4060801@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:08:25 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Adams CC: 3600@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> <4A3B518B.20806@gmx.at> <72CF189B361D4D1E8D8E3FED0AFEEDA0@us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <72CF189B361D4D1E8D8E3FED0AFEEDA0@us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.76 >> > I didn't try anything before; I was just perusing the >> > code, and I wondered what it was trying to do. >> >> The only way to understand such code is by comparing the original code >> with the present one and, if they differ, go through the >> revisions, look at the ChangeLogs, and maybe scan emacs-devel and >> friends for errors reported wrt that code. > > I think you misunderstood me. I was speaking about perusing the original code, > not yours. I was saying that I didn't run into a problem trying to do something. > I didn't run into a problem at all. I was simply browsing the (original) code > and noticed that it seemed strange. That's all. What's your semantics of the word "peruse"? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 17 02:17:05 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2011 06:17:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oD2-0004XW-Ch for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:17:04 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oCz-0004XA-WA for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:17:02 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4o8F-0002g9-W2 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:12:08 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:08:49 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #3600 X-MailScanner-ID: 1R4o8F-0002g9-W2 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316844728.19249@jurGLLVAI+vlPmGJWLGYVA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) close 3600 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 17 02:20:07 2011 Received: (at 3600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2011 06:20:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oFy-0004dF-K6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:20:07 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oFe-0004bp-Ao for 3600@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:19:48 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oAt-0002l3-Rr; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:14:51 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer In-Reply-To: <72CF189B361D4D1E8D8E3FED0AFEEDA0@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:23:36 -0700") Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:08:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com> <4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at> <4A3B518B.20806@gmx.at> <72CF189B361D4D1E8D8E3FED0AFEEDA0@us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Ikonika's _Contact, Love, Want, Have_: "Red Marker Page (Good Ending)" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1R4oAt-0002l3-Rr X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316844891.94782@bhosWCUXxVkYEHSAs7QN1w X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3600 Cc: 'martin rudalics' , 3600@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) "Drew Adams" writes: > I think you misunderstood me. I was speaking about perusing the > original code, not yours. I was saying that I didn't run into a > problem trying to do something. I didn't run into a problem at all. I > was simply browsing the (original) code and noticed that it seemed > strange. That's all. This doesn't seem like a bug, so I'm closing the report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 17 10:11:25 2011 Received: (at 3600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2011 14:11:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4vc4-0008Ou-Bn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 10:11:25 -0400 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4vc2-0008On-HC for 3600@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 10:11:23 -0400 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p8HE6TFW028378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:06:30 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8HE6S2a027711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:06:28 GMT Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8HE6Nt0000432; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:06:23 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.54.49) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:06:23 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" References: <0F4C735B7FF74432818F7CFAB4C85394@us.oracle.com><4A3A11E7.4060900@gmx.at><4A3B518B.20806@gmx.at><72CF189B361D4D1E8D8E3FED0AFEEDA0@us.oracle.com> Subject: RE: bug#3600: 23.0.94; shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 07:06:24 -0700 Message-ID: <2D39E7801C48425DA018F19569473E47@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: Thread-Index: Acx1ASYCP/xRcoyrRxewviP3nuZ9XgAQWHhg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090206.4E74A967.003C:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3600 Cc: 'martin rudalics' , 3600@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) > This doesn't seem like a bug, so I'm closing the report. Why? Why does it not seem like a bug to you? The Emacs windows expert (Martin) said clearly "Looks like a bug.", and he provided a patch that tries to to fix it. I reported it, but I declined to build Emacs and test the proposed fix. That does not imply that there is no bug. From unknown Tue Jun 24 06:51:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:24:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator