GNU bug report logs - #35910
[PATCH] services: Add ‘/usr/bin/env’ special file.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35910: closed ([PATCH] services: Add ‘/usr/bin/env’
 special file.)
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:29:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:28:32 +0200
with message-id <87pnkdwwfj.fsf <at> nckx>
and subject line Re: Scripting guix in guile (Konrad Hinsen)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #35910,
regarding [PATCH] services: Add ‘/usr/bin/env’ special file.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
35910: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35910
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] services: Add ‘/usr/bin/env’ special file.
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 04:06:35 +0200

* gnu/services/base.scm (%base-services): Add ‘/usr/bin/env‘ to
special-files-service-type.
---

Guix,

I didn't even realise this was ‘missing’.  Is there any reason not to include it next to /bin/sh?

Sure, it's not pure, but then why provide /bin/sh when nowadays /usr/bin/env is both more common, more flexible,>

Feel free to gently enlighten me.

Kind regards,

T G-R

gnu/services/base.scm | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/services/base.scm b/gnu/services/base.scm
index f709ca5519..444e48f137 100644
--- a/gnu/services/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/services/base.scm
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
 ;;; Copyright © 2018 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe <at> gmail.com>
 ;;; Copyright © 2019 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
+;;; Copyright © 2019 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -2382,6 +2383,8 @@ to handle."
 
         (service special-files-service-type
                  `(("/bin/sh" ,(file-append (canonical-package bash)
-                                            "/bin/sh"))))))
+                                            "/bin/sh"))
+                   ("/usr/bin/env" ,(file-append (canonical-package coreutils)
+                                                 "/usr/bin/env"))))))
 
 ;;; base.scm ends here
-- 
2.21.0

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: help-guix <at> gnu.org, 35910-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Gary Johnson <lambdatronic <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Scripting guix in guile (Konrad Hinsen)
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:28:32 +0200

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Konrad,

Konrad Hinsen 写道：
> Is there any reason why this isn't defined by default? That 
> would solve
> portability problems for lots of scripts, and I don't see any
> disadvantage caused by this link.

It is now!

Kind regards,

T G-R

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.