GNU bug report logs - #35885
25.2; Few mistakes in Emacs Manual (+ proposals)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 35885 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35885: 25.2; Few mistakes in Emacs Manual (+ proposals)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:32:36 +0200

> When N is negative, -N is positive, so the original text sounds
> correct to me.

Of course this way it's correct, but as you wrote few mails before
"This is a user manual, not a mathematical paper (...)" and this
(-1) x (-N) seems like unnecessary burden.  And without it
expressions like "... leaving -N spaces..." or (look below) "mark the
previous −N files" makes no sense.  Readers will more likely to
interpret this '-' as negation of "previous" word.  Just like D. Adams
wrote "(...) it's not obvious - it's easy to misread it.  Of course,
it's not possible to leave a negative number of spaces (...).
A careful reader will figure it out, but that might mean having to
read it more than once."

I was curious how it looks in other examples where 'N' is present,
here is the list:

1. In INFO @ 11.2 Commands to Mark Textual Objects:
A negative argument moves the mark back by N words.

2. In INFO @ 12.1.2 Killing by Lines:
With a negative argument −N, it kills N lines preceding the current
line, together with the text on the current line before point.

3. In INFO @ 14.2 Recentering:
A negative argument -N puts point N lines from the bottom of the
window.

4. In INFO @ 25.2 Sentences
... with a negative argument −N, it kills back to the beginning of the
Nth preceding sentence.

5. In INFO @ 26.2.2 Moving by Defuns:
‘C-M-a’ with a negative argument −N moves forward N times to the next
beginning of a defun.

6. In INFO @ 26.5.1 Comment Commands:
A positive argument N adds N delimiters, while a negative argument -N
removes N delimiters.
...
With a positive prefix argument N, it operates on N lines starting
with the current one; with a negative N, it affects N preceding lines.

7. In INFO @ 30.6 Dired Marks vs. Flags :
[at '* m']... (if N is negative, mark the previous −N files)...
...
[at '* u']... (if N is negative, unmark the previous −N files)...
...
[at '* <DEL>']... (if N is negative, unmark the next −N files)...

8. In INFO @ 30.7 Operating on Files:
(If N is negative, the command operates on the −N files preceding the
current line.)

--- end of examples ---

So, in 2., 3., 4., 5., 6.(1st), we have pattern of "negative argument
-N ... something N something..."

In 1. it's something similar but without '-N' just "negative
argument", also 6.(2nd) is something similar but 'N' doesn't have
minus sign.

But in 7. and 8. (and the one I already sent) we have "if N is
negative... something -N something".

So, after looking at more examples, I think the best idea would be to
go with the most used pattern, therefore:
   - add '-N' to 1.,
   - add minus sign do 6.(2nd),
   - replace - in 7., 8., and the one I sent - "if N is negative"
     with "with negative argument -N" then change '-N' to 'N' in the
     rest of each sentence.

There is also a problem of minus sign, or to simply put - lack of it
in 3. and 6.(1st) and the one I sent - there we can see "hyphen-minus"
(#x2d).  In other cases it is "minus sign" (#x2212).

If we agree on this I could send message with "In FILENAME.TEXI
L?-? change this line to this" if it helps you (I don't know how
to make normal patches, sorry).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.