GNU bug report logs - #3588
NS: wrong font chosen

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: David Reitter <david.reitter <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:15:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: unreproducible

Merged with 3593, 3596, 3727

Done: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#3596: closed (NS: wrong font chosen)
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:53:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:52:25 +0100
with message-id <m2poqlr1ee.fsf <at> idiocy.org>
and subject line Re: bug#3596: NS: wrong font chosen
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #3588,
regarding NS: wrong font chosen
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
3588: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: David Reitter <david.reitter <at> gmail.com>
To: Adrian Robert <adrian.b.robert <at> gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: NS: wrong font chosen
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:12:55 -0400
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Adrian Robert wrote:

> Hmm, Lucida Calligraphy has 'italic' set, which I assume causes  
> emacs to not use it for non-italic text.  However, I wonder why it  
> is creating a synth-italic entity here -- it shouldn't.

That's right, there's only an italic variant of it.  (If I demand  
italic, it uses it and does NOT use a synthetic variant.)

If there's only an italic variant, it should be used as regular, and,  
in principle, the italic variant should be realized as a synthetic  
font.  Normally what I've seen done there in print is that if a block  
of text is emphasized in italics, the extra-emphasized portions of it  
are then regular.  So you could create a synthetic variant with slant  
to the left (using the existing slant (degree) information).


[smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
To: David Reitter <david.reitter <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Robert <adrian.b.robert <at> gmail.com>, 3588-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 3596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#3596: NS: wrong font chosen
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:52:25 +0100
Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org> writes:

> I can't reproduce this in Emacs 25. I don't have Lucida Calligraphy, but
> Brush Script MT appears to only have Italic and it displays fine.

No response in quite a long time. I believe the NS font back-end has been
completely replaced since this bug report.
-- 
Alan Third


This bug report was last modified 8 years and 321 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.