GNU bug report logs - #35864
~/.local/bin is missing in default PATH on Guix System

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com>
To: 35864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35864: ~/.local/bin is missing in default PATH on Guix System
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:55:36 -0600

(from the digest)
>Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 17:31:38 +0200
>From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
>To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
>Cc: 35864 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>Subject: bug#35864: ~/.local/bin is missing in default PATH on Guix
>	System
>Message-ID: <20190523153138.6kspxwfzeisntll5 <at> pelzflorian.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>[...]
>
>Adding ~/.local/bin to the PATH is common on other distros.  When
>compiling and installing software as a user without making a package
>for it, I want to configure it with --prefix=$HOME/.local so I can
>install without sudo.  Then I want to be able to run:
>
>myprog
>
>instead of
>
>PATH=$HOME/.local/bin myprog
>
>In particular, I want instructions to work on all distros, even though
>Debian failed/fails to do this at the moment too.
>
>Regards,
>Florian
>

I personally think including $HOME/.local/bin in PATH by default is
unnecessary because the Guix package manager lets non-root users
install packages and installs from source with the --no-substitutes
option. However if some people don't want take the time to write and
debug a package definition for programs they want to install that are
not included in guix by default, installing to $HOME/.local remains a
valid option.

The simplest way to resolve this is probably to include it in the
skeleton folder in your OS definition (flexible design FTW, am I
right?). Maybe there can be a service to allow this option without
everyone who wants it writing the code themselves?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.