From news@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com Mon Jun 15 19:57:23 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Jun 2009 02:57:23 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5G2vIoe006477 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:57:19 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGOrO-0001ey-2p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGOrJ-0001ef-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54905 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGOrJ-0001ec-D9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:13 -0400 Received: from moderators.individual.net ([130.133.4.7]:41715) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGOrI-0005c8-QF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:13 -0400 Received: from mail129.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.147]) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.69) for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1MGOrH-0006aT-Tp>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:57:12 +0200 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: news@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-129.messagelabs.com!1245121028!27692751!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.53] Received: (qmail 17544 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2009 02:57:08 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.53) by server-9.tower-129.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Jun 2009 02:57:08 -0000 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5G2v7Yk005057 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:07 -0400 Received: from mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com [144.155.224.139]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5G2v5o0005054 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:06 -0400 Received: from sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5G2v5Ta000460 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:05 -0400 Received: from newssvr22.news.prodigy.net (nlpi066-int.nbdc.sbc.com [207.115.46.222]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5G2v30H000450 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:03 -0400 Received: from nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com (nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com [127.0.0.1]) by newssvr22.news.prodigy.net (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5G2v3qK025455 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id n5G2v2nJ025454; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:02 -0400 To: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Path: 508a9475!not-for-mail Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: gdb not responding on Emacs from CVS From: Baoqiu Cui Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fMVvovcMk/5a2Z33LhrZ3LT2vU8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.131.62.113 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com 1245121022 ST000 209.131.62.113 (Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:02 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:57:02 EDT Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: SCSGG_KE@JTSP_@YMZJ\_Q\@TJ_ZTB\MV@BJ]Q]KEYUNDQUCCNSUAACY@L[ZX__HGFD]JBJNSFXTOOGA_VWY^_HG@FW_HUTHOH]TBPGCO\P^PLP^@[GLHUK@WLECKFVL^TYG[@RMWQXIWM[SDDYWNLG_G[_BWUCHFY_Y@AS@Q[B\APPF@DCZM_PG_VSCPQZM Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:57:02 -0700 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Hi, I've had this problem for a while on Emacs built from CVS. Today I updated my Emacs directory and rebuilt everything, the problem still exists (GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit)). Basically, after typing in ``M-x gdb'' to debug a program, say myprog, a buffer called *gud-myprog* will appear, and it displays some info about gdb and prints out a prompt: (gdb) _ Now, if I type in a command like "pwd" and press Enter, *nothing* happens. I have to press C-c C-c to get out: (gdb) pwd C-c C-cQuit (gdb) This does not happen on Emacs 22.3. Does anyone know what the problem is? Thanks, Baoqiu From nickrob@snap.net.nz Tue Jun 16 05:58:54 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Jun 2009 12:58:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5GCwoDs012817 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:58:51 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGYFV-0005d0-LT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:58:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGYFQ-0005X7-B6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:58:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60125 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGYFQ-0005Wu-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:58:44 -0400 Received: from pinatubo-2.switch.ch ([130.59.1.10]:34719 helo=pinatubo.switch.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGYFP-0006Ab-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:58:43 -0400 Received: from [2406:e000::20f:eaff:fe89:5cb5] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by pinatubo.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MGYFL-0007F3-Ml for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:58:40 +0200 Received: from totara (65.63.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.63.65]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571C43DA008; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:58:35 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E3CBAC13E; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:58:33 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18999.38649.869497.536507@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:58:33 +1200 To: Baoqiu Cui , 3585@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Subject: bug#3585: gdb not responding on Emacs from CVS Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Baoqiu Cui writes: > Hi, > > I've had this problem for a while on Emacs built from CVS. Today I > updated my Emacs directory and rebuilt everything, the problem still > exists (GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit)). > > Basically, after typing in ``M-x gdb'' to debug a program, say myprog, a > buffer called *gud-myprog* will appear, and it displays some info about > gdb and prints out a prompt: > > (gdb) _ > > Now, if I type in a command like "pwd" and press Enter, *nothing* > happens. I have to press C-c C-c to get out: > > (gdb) pwd > C-c C-cQuit > (gdb) > > This does not happen on Emacs 22.3. > > Does anyone know what the problem is? I don't see this. What version of GDB do you have? Can you please do M-x gdb-enable-debug before M-x gdb and post the value of gdb-debug-log after doing: (gdb) pwd -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From news@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com Tue Jun 16 10:00:29 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Jun 2009 17:00:30 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5GH0MNJ025365 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:00:23 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGc1F-0007j2-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGc1A-0007ik-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41726 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGc1A-0007ih-Mf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:16 -0400 Received: from pinatubo-2.switch.ch ([130.59.1.10]:36412 helo=pinatubo.switch.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGc1A-00011h-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:16 -0400 Received: from [216.82.253.179] (helo=mail167.messagelabs.com) by pinatubo.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MGc17-0003U5-Li for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:00:14 +0200 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: news@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-167.messagelabs.com!1245171610!13386440!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.53] Received: (qmail 3877 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2009 17:00:11 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.53) by server-6.tower-167.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Jun 2009 17:00:11 -0000 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5GH09Ph020941 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:10 -0400 Received: from mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com [144.155.224.139]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5GH05ho020509 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:05 -0400 Received: from sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5GH05qn020254 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:05 -0400 Received: from nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com (nlpi061-int.nbdc.sbc.com [207.115.46.231]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5GH01eA020086 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:02 -0400 Received: from nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com (nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com [127.0.0.1]) by nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5GH01NE005763 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id n5GH01dM005712; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:01 -0400 To: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Path: 508a9475!not-for-mail Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: Re: bug#3585: gdb not responding on Emacs from CVS References: From: Baoqiu Cui Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:M2GMLrws6AZCnfw01HIt2DbWWQg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 63 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.131.62.113 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com 1245171601 ST000 209.131.62.113 (Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:01 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:00:01 EDT Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: TSUGG_KE@JTSP_@YMZJ\_Q\@TJ_ZTB\MV@BD]\YIJYWZUYICD^RAQBKZQTZTX\_I[^G_KGFNON[ZOE_AZNVO^\XGGNTCIRPIJH[@RQKBXLRZ@CD^HKANYVW@RLGEZEJN@\_WZJBNZYYKVIOR]T]MNMG_Z[YVWSCH_Q[GPC_A@CARQVXDSDA^M]@DRVUM@RBM Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:00:01 -0700 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Thanks for looking into this, Nick. Please the info you need below: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) writes: > Baoqiu Cui writes: > > Hi, > > > > I've had this problem for a while on Emacs built from CVS. Today I > > updated my Emacs directory and rebuilt everything, the problem still > > exists (GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit)). > > > > Basically, after typing in ``M-x gdb'' to debug a program, say myprog, a > > buffer called *gud-myprog* will appear, and it displays some info about > > gdb and prints out a prompt: > > > > (gdb) _ > > > > Now, if I type in a command like "pwd" and press Enter, *nothing* > > happens. I have to press C-c C-c to get out: > > > > (gdb) pwd > > C-c C-cQuit > > (gdb) > > > > This does not happen on Emacs 22.3. > > > > Does anyone know what the problem is? > > I don't see this. What version of GDB do you have? > > Can you please do M-x gdb-enable-debug before M-x gdb and post the value of gdb-debug-log > after doing: > > (gdb) pwd After typing in ``pwd'', gdb-debug-log has the following value (from which you can see the GDB version that I use): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ gdb-debug-log is a variable defined in `gdb-ui.el'. Its value is ((recv . "(gdb) ") (recv . "Using host libthread_db library \"/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1\".\n") (recv . "License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later \nThis is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\nThere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type \"show copying\"\nand \"show warranty\" for details.\nThis GDB was configured as \"x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu\"...\n") (recv . "GNU gdb 6.7.1\nCopyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n")) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ It seems that the Return key was ignored. After pressing C-c C-c, the value of gdb-debug-log becomes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ gdb-debug-log is a variable defined in `gdb-ui.el'. Its value is ((recv . "(gdb) ") (recv . "Quit\n") (recv . "(gdb) ") (recv . "Using host libthread_db library \"/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1\".\n") (recv . "License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later \nThis is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\nThere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type \"show copying\"\nand \"show warranty\" for details.\nThis GDB was configured as \"x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu\"...\n") (recv . "GNU gdb 6.7.1\nCopyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n")) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks, Baoqiu From news@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com Tue Jun 16 14:40:46 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Jun 2009 21:40:46 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5GLedIw013756 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:40:41 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGgOV-0003Ab-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGgOR-000370-Nj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41930 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGgOR-00036n-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:35 -0400 Received: from moderators.individual.net ([130.133.4.7]:48640) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGgOQ-0006hm-Rd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:35 -0400 Received: from mail167.messagelabs.com ([216.82.253.179]) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.69) for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1MGgOO-0000BY-RW>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:40:33 +0200 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: news@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-167.messagelabs.com!1245188427!13626847!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.53] Received: (qmail 26018 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2009 21:40:28 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.53) by server-13.tower-167.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Jun 2009 21:40:28 -0000 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5GLeQgH032751 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:27 -0400 Received: from mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com [144.155.224.139]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5GLeL7p032683 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:21 -0400 Received: from sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5GLeLlx025073 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:21 -0400 Received: from newssvr22.news.prodigy.net (nlpi066-int.nbdc.sbc.com [207.115.46.222]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5GLeEAM024363 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:14 -0400 Received: from nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com (nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com [127.0.0.1]) by newssvr22.news.prodigy.net (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n5GLeEMm013321 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id n5GLeEgi013320; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:14 -0400 To: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Path: 508a9475!not-for-mail Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: Re: bug#3585: gdb not responding on Emacs from CVS References: From: Baoqiu Cui Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NecmYvXWprRzEVGHV4Vv5GR00qA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 50 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.131.62.113 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com 1245188414 ST000 209.131.62.113 (Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:14 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:40:14 EDT Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: S[OWR_SG\B^UCWDYIBHZOWP@YZOZ@GXOXB]T]_MIJQR@EPIB_VUKAH_[MTX\IS[K[NGYJJFNOFZR_G[BUNTAOQLFE^TEHRPI]PZZRP_BMDSFQFL_]CBHXRWCMDCUZAZN@D_AKMNLEI]MWHCSXL^]NNC__CZFGSGHYYXWPFG@SCAVA]\FT\@B\RDGENSUQS^M Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:40:13 -0700 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Baoqiu Cui writes: > After typing in ``pwd'', gdb-debug-log has the following value > (from which you can see the GDB version that I use): > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > gdb-debug-log is a variable defined in `gdb-ui.el'. > Its value is > ((recv . "(gdb) ") > (recv . "Using host libthread_db library \"/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1\".\n") > (recv . "License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later \nThis is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\nThere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type \"show copying\"\nand \"show warranty\" for details.\nThis GDB was configured as \"x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu\"...\n") > (recv . "GNU gdb 6.7.1\nCopyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n")) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > It seems that the Return key was ignored. After pressing C-c C-c, the > value of gdb-debug-log becomes: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > gdb-debug-log is a variable defined in `gdb-ui.el'. > Its value is > ((recv . "(gdb) ") > (recv . "Quit\n") > (recv . "(gdb) ") > (recv . "Using host libthread_db library \"/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1\".\n") > (recv . "License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later \nThis is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\nThere is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type \"show copying\"\nand \"show warranty\" for details.\nThis GDB was configured as \"x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu\"...\n") > (recv . "GNU gdb 6.7.1\nCopyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n")) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Here is some more information. It seems that this problem has something to do with the size of the program that I am trying to debug. If I try to follow the same steps for a small testing program, everything is fine. I noticed that, for the big program that I was debugging, it took about 50 seconds to have the "[initializing...]" Debugger status in mode-line changed to "[ready]". GDB simply does not respond to user's commands before it is *ready*. I tried the same thing on Emacs 21, which does not report status like [initializing...] or [ready], and it seems that GDB interface there is much faster. It only takes 10-15 seconds to load the same big program and then display the "(gdb) " prompt. Once the prompt is displayed, GDB is *ready* to respond any command I type in. Why does it take 50 seconds to "initialize" things? Emacs 22 seems to have the same "delay". Is there anyway to cut the time spent on initializing? Thanks, Baoqiu From nickrob@snap.net.nz Sun Jun 21 05:48:09 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 21 Jun 2009 12:48:09 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5LCm4FL015548 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:48:06 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MIMSq-0005EU-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:48:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MIMSl-00056R-1O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:48:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59371 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MIMSk-00056B-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:47:58 -0400 Received: from pinatubo-2.switch.ch ([130.59.1.10]:33387 helo=pinatubo.switch.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MIMSk-0008Qt-92 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:47:58 -0400 Received: from [2406:e000::20f:eaff:fe89:5cb5] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by pinatubo.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MIMSi-0007aI-Kp for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:47:57 +0200 Received: from totara (137.26.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.26.137]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506733D9FCA; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:47:52 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A335C13F; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:47:51 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19006.11255.5188.858625@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:47:51 +1200 To: Baoqiu Cui , 3585@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Subject: bug#3585: gdb not responding on Emacs from CVS Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. > Here is some more information. It seems that this problem has something > to do with the size of the program that I am trying to debug. If I try > to follow the same steps for a small testing program, everything is > fine. > > I noticed that, for the big program that I was debugging, it took about > 50 seconds to have the "[initializing...]" Debugger status in mode-line > changed to "[ready]". GDB simply does not respond to user's commands > before it is *ready*. > > I tried the same thing on Emacs 21, which does not report status like > [initializing...] or [ready], and it seems that GDB interface there is > much faster. It only takes 10-15 seconds to load the same big program > and then display the "(gdb) " prompt. Once the prompt is displayed, GDB > is *ready* to respond any command I type in. > > Why does it take 50 seconds to "initialize" things? Emacs 22 seems to > have the same "delay". Is there anyway to cut the time spent on > initializing? Emacs 22 builds a list of filenames from GDB that were used to build the executable and this takes a long time if you have an executable that was created from a large number of files, particularly if you use stabs debug format. There is an option, gdb-create-source-file-list, which when set to nil means that Emacs doesn't build this list at start up. That makes it quicker but if there are relevant files in existing buffers or you visit them they won't be enabled for debugging, e.g., you won't be able to click in the fringe to set a breakpoint until execution has already stopped there. This option has been around since 2008-07-01. If your Emacs predates this then you might like to get Emacs 23.1 which will be released shortly. Alternatively you can get the Emacs 21 speed/behavior by using M-x gud-gdb. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob From bobby.prani@gmail.com Tue Sep 29 05:03:16 2009 Received: (at 3585) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 Sep 2009 12:03:16 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail-qy0-f197.google.com (mail-qy0-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n8TC3Es1011195 for <3585@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:03:16 -0700 Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so4198370qyk.19 for <3585@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=eiOklWTSDvY1Jgp8AWmztZ3RbOz5elfbkdrsI9+ISc8=; b=ad8h+bye7G6AuZDAgz0ysovbfFkWNXPPamHzLNMZqgBCFbyIR5H7W+gQeYhhLprM8F 1u2fCMUeD5TNQNZqyOKypm7LygEZxLUUlrozKtRjADWbZhURrV7fCaG/SUvEdciEP0tf kEurXpZOH9y6iQdeUs1ybHKh4Zz/K0ydlR/00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=ZAAf+pDKDlv5ClhgJcCgirROp5X/waI47264ou3BjGy7FaUAjzJw6wpVStJITDsQ4k FOk77mOo3Q1Uue50GZneLplF2FD6xdBVJ3JVdG4J2vE50Eoml2wGBrhxmBxJSTUtCEad kwh7YOvcvt/usZpea4O1O1UYEtjF2AlMcrM94= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.44.19 with SMTP id y19mr1688848qce.48.1254225789288; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Pranith Kumar Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:32:49 +0530 Message-ID: <430c80e90909290502i435e2a3die657dfbff0f300f8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Still contains it To: 3585@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I am using the released emacs 23.1 source and this still contains the bug. Using M-x gud-gdb solves the problem. Thanks, -- Pranith. From cyd@stupidchicken.com Sat Oct 31 12:43:11 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 31 Oct 2009 19:43:11 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from pantheon-po30.its.yale.edu (pantheon-po30.its.yale.edu [130.132.50.4]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n9VJh9vM021936 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:43:11 -0700 Received: from furry (173-14-147-246-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.14.147.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po30.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n9VJh43e032705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:43:04 -0400 Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B94FC070; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:43:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: tags 3585 wontfix Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:43:04 -0400 Message-ID: <87fx8zmjsn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) tags 3585 + wontfix notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 17 02:20:06 2011 Received: (at 3585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2011 06:20:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oFw-0004d1-UF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:20:06 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oFd-0004bh-5r for 3585@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:19:46 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4oAs-0002ko-QR; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:14:50 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Pranith Kumar Subject: Re: Still contains it In-Reply-To: <430c80e90909290502i435e2a3die657dfbff0f300f8@mail.gmail.com> (Pranith Kumar's message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:32:49 +0530") Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:07:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <430c80e90909290502i435e2a3die657dfbff0f300f8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Ikonika's _Contact, Love, Want, Have_: "Look (Final Boss Stage)" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1R4oAs-0002ko-QR X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316844890.96069@7ZCu5X6Xo4/89XYzU4QYVg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3585 Cc: 3585@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Pranith Kumar writes: > I am using the released emacs 23.1 source and this still contains the bug. > > Using M-x gud-gdb solves the problem. This was marked as wontfix + notabug without any explanation, but not closed, so I'm wondering whether you're still seeing this bug in Emacs 24? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 06 18:08:42 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 22:08:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBw7N-0002jz-Aq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:08:41 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBw7L-0002jt-Qy for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:08:40 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RBw75-0002pc-61 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:08:23 +0200 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:08:22 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #3585 X-MailScanner-ID: 1RBw75-0002pc-61 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1318543703.29631@LlwZqtx5Ifv6kNx/s41yeQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) close 3585 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 06 18:15:04 2011 Received: (at 3585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 22:15:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBwDX-0002wV-Dd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:15:04 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBwDR-0002up-6N for 3585@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:14:58 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RBwD7-0002yR-8D; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:14:37 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Pranith Kumar Subject: Re: bug#3585: Still contains it In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:07:10 +0200") Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:08:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <430c80e90909290502i435e2a3die657dfbff0f300f8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Clogs's _The Creatures in the Garden of Lady Walton_: "Red Seas" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1RBwD7-0002yR-8D X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1318544077.45818@0dXFis1m5gJGZkI/CmUV3Q X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 3585 Cc: 3585@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I am using the released emacs 23.1 source and this still contains the bug. >> >> Using M-x gud-gdb solves the problem. > > This was marked as wontfix + notabug without any explanation, but not > closed, so I'm wondering whether you're still seeing this bug in Emacs > 24? More information was requested, but was apparently not given, so I'm closing this bug report. If this is still a problem, please reopen this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:11:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator