GNU bug report logs - #358
dabbrev-abbrev-char-regexp

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#358: dabbrev-abbrev-char-regexp
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:07:27 -0400

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> wrote:
>> +For instance, if you are programming in Lisp, `yes-or-no-p' is a
>> +symbol, while `yes', `or', `no' and `p' are considered words.
>
> This text (same as before) is a bit misleading.  It makes it sound
> like `yes', `or', `no', and `p' are considered words but not symbols.
> They are also considered symbols.  Each of their characters has word
> syntax, but in Lisp those names name symbols.
>
> It is better not to talk about Lisp symbols at all here, I think.
> This is about the syntax categories symbol and word.  It is not
> about which names can be used for Lisp symbols.  (And there is
> no such thing as a Lisp "word".)

The text is using "symbol" as a shorthand for "text which
`forward-symbol' would move over" or "sequence of characters with word
or symbol constituent syntax", and "word" as short for "text which
`forward-word' would move over" or "sequence of characters with word
constituent syntax". I think it's reasonably clear from context (as
you say, there is no such thing as a Lisp "word" in any other sense),
but I have no problem replacing it with something less ambiguous if
you can come up with something that's not too long.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.