From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 10 10:55:23 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2019 14:55:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6vi-0002GD-QS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6vh-0002G1-A9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6vc-00040C-4g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6vb-0001U5-7x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6va-0003ys-0M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:25121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6vZ-0003wk-6A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:13 -0400 Received: from dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 026815a8 for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 16:55:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=201701; bh=FB8je9y+Cd6qNBSWFrhSR7sUQ4XpqkStcnBa1nRLQnU=; b=Y+KIEYscHsmJ zATYypOSrcvXxhJp0rT7k8Aqeiz6kDZoGxuoZ/ItzkLfUXqQLlkNTsk4V1rkokjh wpiLXsjvZplcIyGRm4B7+QhAYF3zsw6AQ/LE5Ehgwqw6gPUcrfK2iUGaWqjBBU1/ XniAPg4vGxVin1ICkrMrMKR1SKiRyTY= Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (10.240.26.12 [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6ccea5d2 for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4f9eb0fd for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 59275a32 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Branson To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Mesa is failing an assertion Mail-Followup-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 10:55:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87ef56741h.fsf@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 78.46.223.134 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello I am getting a weird mesa assertion when I try to start sway. sway: ../mesa-18.3.5/src/mesa/program/prog_parameter.c:247: _mesa_add_parameter: Assertion `0 < size && size <=4' failed. Aborted. Is anyone else getting this issue? Thanks, -- Joshua Branson Sent from Emacs and Gnus From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 10 14:01:29 2019 Received: (at 35669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2019 18:01:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP9pp-0006lR-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:01:29 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:51053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP9pm-0006lF-IK for 35669@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:01:27 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAA922F0F; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:01:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 May 2019 14:01:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=vUy7bovz05u7ILmt+aObPExF8I oR4HDmKMP4h2HRFQc=; b=lmT1wpY93XcTiPTByqPYmnFvRGtH+lUUdVkGnIC8nS kj54q3GKnUJ4/uKrhk8o6+nssHPc/mHsuvJWI7gT6Ox/EKZaCoz/ehgH7LRuZZIM /pRb2dv7BwCumFVF3i6+GpUmU3/nhZcE4x/+CpTuhwGWeXzXreMYjK/6p96fHDE0 iBKHYxYf8cbhAGFdkiK2ckQwNmLCvg6sf0Gnb8cHLiQrSUt8RundFh3ulRXRXxsB VOWd7pbllFNTTq3pcpby0xR+8fc96oTuHB0b5i1PAKkxdhRbhEZz1lVg5VH5zaxI Q0F/3Q5AnSUkFfO0njOomigfuRxu31paR6qcte6HQhAw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vUy7bo vz05u7ILmt+aObPExF8IoR4HDmKMP4h2HRFQc=; b=FzThA7wCTJzB2NEK9rfWtu nWBB8g8jbxaA9TkiZARoKz3lCeKNhWKvyAEMzruLpulupWD0jj7lykTpJBGAoQF8 vJBxXRbNvjDnjft3ls5cUdt9yrScEfc6ZK5O0vuTfucsLN+ljOYjuXe2FSnKreGR pQ0ZZp7KocgKyhQpzfZ8zYcZTHqB+C6DZVZ9Let5ImgIl5ra8R8FXurHBtPY1Ihi ZhgEUTTpSir8Y8GsTa0OVUyxzESWuetU5puDA7vGuoJOH1dmVtGpoLZOYfJ1rnFw TTqzMXML9y5vr3ce6itTUQgDsv61YIGgkxCq1oBpClGVZ3AJwfTHBq2sTF4MvnHg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeekgdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehgtderredtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhu shcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrg hinhepfhhrvggvuggvshhkthhophdrohhrghenucfkphepiedvrdduiedrvddviedrudeg tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (140.226.16.62.customer.cdi.no [62.16.226.140]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2A167103D3; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:01:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Joshua Branson , 35669@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35669: Mesa is failing an assertion In-Reply-To: <87ef56741h.fsf@dismail.de> References: <87ef56741h.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.28.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 20:01:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87tve2b34n.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35669 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Joshua Branson writes: > Hello I am getting a weird mesa assertion when I try to start sway. > > sway: ../mesa-18.3.5/src/mesa/program/prog_parameter.c:247: > _mesa_add_parameter: Assertion `0 < size && size <=4' failed. > Aborted. > > Is anyone else getting this issue? I've seen this too and went as far as bisecting Mesa: . ...after bisecting Guix to e6a668ec7303a71f87e4c9354b1458e555058c63. (Guix makes this process surprisingly easy btw, someone should write a blog post about it.) The fix is to wipe Mesas shader cache: $ rm -rf "$HOME/.cache/mesa_shader_cache" You may also need to do the same for your display manager, if any: $ sudo rm -rf "/var/lib/{sddm,gdm}/.cache/mesa_shader_cache" I don't know why Mesa fails to do that on its own. I can't find a lot on the internet about this issue, so I suspect it is a problem specific to Guix. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlzVvGgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqXjgf/QKrLia1oSN22G88jul1bXuPNmbjRG9HwfoLUY9Dzhgk5CvIyePf132IN cYwxesLSQdc5k4mQkfjIgdgdAnsJ119hkji5vPUXmxSJ8WuAXOD0MXAXw8gz2CfV f1MibRP7+24ikyoCFdA8QGBURk3Nmkf1GenGlz/lTysDB7uhwvDblLIOYWzYUlFt XawY/oKC77OzODl7WN1vbzmKS0ElJ1St+AOgwiJxQ3rgBBn8FkrUH9+SbsA4ovQy pWKD1kOVxxZbQxfMF7cBPHb2xNkbdjIsiFYSYivXoZ/YlpRAs9ORbBAsKyY2cNoB +nCRO7oTszRwMlN1WIw7tir2E6Pypw== =SLCi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 11:29:54 2019 Received: (at 35669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2019 15:29:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQCtl-0007HW-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 11:29:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:30427) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQCtj-0007HE-Ce for 35669@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 11:29:53 -0400 Received: from dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1525ab2a for <35669@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:29:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=201701; bh=G2UAOMOAl+LQRBiFUIP7gILxunNloVwNrgjg z+0ISvk=; b=r3fy1ho5jJ+LPg/0/BFyY+xSaRlvaUGjNZ2xgN7tnNUlg4Wi+pEZ 4ON1LcsIaLwNrti4q1l0r4D8lNFWmBOHz/MYZ1eSbErtgcTF6DvQJf72s/JEgOiO Yh9xBr/UAgpBdovNXUJc3oboz/adV1C12KqHYB6hfUFiHnMgEf6mU6Y= Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (10.240.26.11 [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 851b2b4f for <35669@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4933bf83 for <35669@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 37cb37e4 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <35669@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:29:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Branson To: 35669@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35669: Mesa is failing an assertion References: <87ef56741h.fsf@dismail.de> <87tve2b34n.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:29:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tve2b34n.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 20:01:12 +0200") Message-ID: <878sva9xuj.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35669 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This did indeed solve my problem. Thanks! -- Joshua Branson Sent from Emacs and Gnus From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 10 10:29:08 2020 Received: (at 35669-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2020 14:29:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34920 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jj1j2-00089G-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:29:08 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:35728) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jj1j0-000897-Ey for 35669-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:29:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF13C55FDF for <35669-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:29:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSdLQH6h-qG6 for <35669-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:29:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Royce Strange DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1591799343; bh=HXBfrHjfazF8gdJgdaTmF6hhmbIOQf+Ijhc1Ilbqg/Y=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QCcF33I5opxb2xYusHsNuBDpiR2bPpkkPQ7FSFsGP8ndCCmjOITSpfsHk1CmtMFlW SGQb3VEXxhuFoArEg0ewzQhcDkSLthjnMzW9MHwGop3BuK2ajZkYzANaol0XPubv2S CEkTL4liH2mTa+7NxVHxxViliqqEKgueMm7aP5hX7G6AP/aIyr0RquSBbLSypfzOJT 1Y+fz8qvVA4hZ+Qd5EwrS0hTGB/jtYKdtebT3+qbJnVAz1lGy5E4NvPeaugrBBLgLG X/oxicuRQ0Rc0v2dLPMKI+BnkTYAWGXkBxn0P16f5nQHH5IprargDudXKGJ3kUO2c7 IVL35vCVKFIIw== To: 35669-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35669: Mesa is failing an assertion References: <87ef56741h.fsf@dismail.de> <87tve2b34n.fsf@fastmail.com> <878sva9xuj.fsf@dismail.de> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:29:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878sva9xuj.fsf@dismail.de> (Joshua Branson's message of "Mon, 13 May 2019 11:29:40 -0400") Message-ID: <87ftb3uh8z.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35669-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello. Joshua Branson reported the fix provided by Marius Bakke solved his issue. Closing. From unknown Fri Aug 08 22:17:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator