GNU bug report logs - #35666
[PATCH 0/2] Build a thread-safe hdf5 library

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 35666 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: bavier <at> cray.com, 35666 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, pgarlick <at> tourbillion-technology.com
Subject: Re: [bug#35666] [PATCH 0/2] Build a thread-safe hdf5 library
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:07:29 +0200
Hi!

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

[…]

>> It also tells you that, if you insist, you can go ahead and pass
>> ‘--enable-unsupported’, but you’re on your own.
>>
>> We found that Debian chose to pass ‘--enable-unsupported’, and indeed
>> that seems to be saner than providing a variant that does very little,
>> but does it in a thread-safe way.
>
> What other effects does “--enable-unsupported” have?  I see that in
> Fedora “--enable-threadsafe” was removed in 2008 because it’s
> “incompatible with --enable-cxx and --enable-fortran”.

“--enable-unsupported” allows you to force a build that combines C++,
Fortran, and thread-safety.  If you don’t pass that flag, you have to
choose between thread-safety and C++/Fortran¹.  A tough choice!

> Instead they seem to be building different flavours: one with
> --enable-fortran, another with --enable-cxx, yet another with MPI and
> --enable-parallel.

Problem is, my colleagues have code that expects both C++ and
thread-safety (as crazy as it might seem).  They were using the Debian
package until now and hadn’t realized about this.

> Do we have contact to the hdf5 developers to ask what the implications
> of “enable-unsupported” are?

I think it’s a warranty-void kind of flag: by passing it, the user
asserts they understand they’re using a configuration not “officially
supported” by the HDF Group, meaning that if it’s buggy, we’re on our
own.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

¹ You would think it’s an April fool’s day prank, but it’s not!  We’re
  in May, at least in my timezone.




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 61 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.