GNU bug report logs - #35591
Segfault on flatpak remote-add

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40489: closed (flatpak segfaults)
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 05:27:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 14 May 2020 07:26:35 +0200
with message-id <87r1vnccj8.fsf <at> elephly.net>
and subject line Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #35591,
regarding flatpak segfaults
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
35591: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35591
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: marmulak <at> disroot.org
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: flatpak segfaults
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 15:24:53 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hey buddy, I tried running flatpak on a freshly installed Guix system (today) and for some reason it segfaults when I try to add the flathub repo. I was told to report the bug to you.

I've attached the command output, Flatpak version is 1.4.3.

It also complains about XDG_DATA_DIRS as you can see, but not sure yet if that affects usage or not. It's possible I installed it wrong, but was generally told that "guix install flatpak" is all that is need for it to work. I'd like flatpaks to be installed for all users on the system, but not yet sure if that's feasible.

Thank you!

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[flatpak-error.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: 35591-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Jonathan Frederickson <jonathan <at> terracrypt.net>
Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:26:35 +0200

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:

> I reported this here:
>
>     https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/3612
>
> I’d say we close this issue here, because the segfault isn’t our fault.

Upstream has acknowledged and addressed the bug.

Closing.

-- 
Ricardo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.