From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 16:42:00 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 20:42:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNNxP-0004wf-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:41:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52786) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNNOf-0003re-B2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:06:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNNOa-0000sy-8z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:06:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNNOW-0001zs-5a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNNOV-0000ZF-0L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:56 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:58327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNNOU-0000J2-FK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:54 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAD82A8 for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 16:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=terracrypt.net; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm1; bh=VeYrp4rska/a/Rfx5p8r7nyfGccV9chaNWdnsaGWw6s=; b=U79JuQP4 VaqRzdS0mGAvIJ5SG2kqkg4IWMEKd9UJqFi0TMzzGCOFBCXcaM8o17F63KfwhxcQ u+XaNyArUOzqkxKMoJuwF+8D8fxQ98oyIQmljKOa2sqFOYORf0jT/cVLxYQcfC0F +jV8cSfnv/5H9ayPOoA5jvuE/kaTltW1xfciqOsKOo4XasPyrNkeT4kUGTb+0r2X 2aTjlliCG87gYUo+mIPj8pH9Ezr1Te0QkxXgSRjP1ENjxHHfAjTDPggXromN5aPc tqhQZWjPwuuctKJfs6C0NeEaUUBuiuJeC7PfQmhcbeR9XBJAYYd8pI2qhemr+eDR /uWHbA1rCAJ/Yg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=VeYrp4rska/a/Rfx5p8r7nyfGccV9 chaNWdnsaGWw6s=; b=1uc2AYMScUM6icRplubYbQjXPxq7CNr/E35S8L0oqctwz PfJcp18y+3fJfk0eVMwvkCaniPfkjDTjfskgC7mDfWFSRx72j+zy76dj+vljSTik s8yAwaXV2NVLIp6Fg7TsCXyHAq78T1ZiMAPFXC25bLzMboevCs6PlQ7CnTIPmqaA 5JC+TrwO0Wea5/3FM6BPolfb8pN3d0I606vL86CIvEgQmibxmTtErTK+mrGhP6wK T38NvAheyHGrLfbRm2gjERW8aGtms4dd0xZt1e7QcDqRFKhM8k31UiPZ1mF4o4BK cXUqdFse2z09e832VI05UWcN0+xvI2Y5HwxmpU4GQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrjeehgdduheefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfffhffvufgtsehttdertd erredtnecuhfhrohhmpedflfhonhgrthhhrghnucfhrhgvuggvrhhitghkshhonhdfuceo jhhonhgrthhhrghnsehtvghrrhgrtghrhihpthdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehjfh hrvggurdhlohgtrghlpdhflhgrthhhuhgsrdhorhhgpdhgnhhurdhorhhgnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrghthhgrnhesthgvrhhrrggtrhihphhtrdhnvghtne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id F228A7C6D9; Sun, 5 May 2019 16:05:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-449-gfb3fc5a-fmstable-20190430v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:25 -0400 From: "Jonathan Frederickson" To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Segfault on flatpak remote-add Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 64.147.123.24 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 May 2019 16:41:58 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I'm attempting to use Flatpak on my Guix system, and I'm experiencing segfaults when attempting to add a remote repo. Provided below are the output of the command I'm attempting to run, as well as some info about my system. ===== jfred@lambdacrypt ~$ flatpak remote-add --if-not-exists flathub https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo Note that the directories '/var/lib/flatpak/exports/share' '/home/jfred/.local/share/flatpak/exports/share' are not in the search path set by the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment variable, so applications installed by Flatpak may not appear on your desktop until the session is restarted. Segmentation fault ===== Current guix commit: jfred@lambdacrypt ~$ guix describe -f channels (list (channel (name 'guix) (url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git") (commit "187f9636f176d62bf869b787ad410e3a528aa1a0"))) ===== Current user package manifest: jfred@lambdacrypt ~$ cat guix.scm (specifications->manifest '("glibc-utf8-locales" ;;# Dotfiles management "stow" "rofi" "gnupg" "emacs-password-store" "pcsc-lite" ;;# Hacking "emacs" "git" "guile@2.2" "font-adobe-source-code-pro" "emacs-guix" ;;# Devops "docker" "docker-cli" "docker-compose" ;; System Administration "htop" "curl" ;;# Desktop "gnome-tweak-tool" "icecat" "luakit" "flatpak" "evolution" ;; Gaming "tintin++" "powwow")) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 18:38:02 2019 Received: (at 35591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 22:38:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPlh-0008Vo-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:38:02 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:33642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPlg-0008VX-Ij for 35591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:38:00 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPla-0003RE-IR; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:37:54 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: "Jonathan Frederickson" Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add References: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 18:36:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> (Jonathan Frederickson's message of "Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:25 -0400") Message-ID: <87muk0sf4e.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35591 Cc: 35591@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Jonathan, "Jonathan Frederickson" writes: > I'm attempting to use Flatpak on my Guix system, and I'm experiencing > segfaults when attempting to add a remote repo. Provided below are the > output of the command I'm attempting to run, as well as some info > about my system. My knowledge of Flatpak is weak, but in general, foreign pre-compiled binaries will not work on Guix unless they are statically linked. Traditional dynamically-linked executables expect to find a dynamic linker and system shared libraries in /lib or /lib64, which do not exist on a Guix system. It is also fairly common for foreign binaries to depend on standard files and programs in /usr, /bin, and /sbin, none of which are present on a Guix system except for /bin/sh. Having said that, if you must run foreign pre-compiled binaries on Guix, there are various hacks to do it. One approach is to install symlinks in /lib*, /usr, /bin, /sbin, etc, pointing to the needed components in /run/current-system. Another is to modify the pre-compiled binaries to look for components in the right place using 'patchelf'. We use the latter approach to bootstrap GHC (Glasgow Haskell Compiler), which can only be compiled by itself. I'm sorry I don't have a better answer for you, but Guix was not designed to run foreign pre-compiled binaries. If that's important to you, it might be that Guix is not a good fit for you. However, if your goal is to run Guix-compiled programs in a sandbox, that's something we are certainly very interested in, and we could use help. We have "guix container" as a building block, and I know that some Guix users have experimented with running e.g. GNU IceCat within a container. I don't know the current status of those efforts. Hopefully someone more knowledgable in this area will chime in. Regards, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 19:36:45 2019 Received: (at 35591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2019 23:36:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNQgW-0001m6-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 19:36:45 -0400 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:41819) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNQCI-0000se-7y for 35591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 19:05:32 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283EF2E9; Sun, 5 May 2019 19:05:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 May 2019 19:05:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=terracrypt.net; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=g7ehOUCYOfOBydZN1oH4K2vmI8 9RzTq4dOBMNsHibd8=; b=SbVPccuZUtj0Yj1RrMURG85uL65ufVRw4rF/YiXn0A kNu/Y5WvFGmPKHkoYEMSP10BNIR79nyr4f7RmA90GgjptxOnsRBv4scf0teiFwO5 Ln3yUHIgqd9wsdoYAeOPEb8o58HL5vEswaQnRqZ6iTnCZfdbVqs7FO61bPUVOXZp qHSTMlD7Jmt6dL1soqH7Hm64E8iY8j15PePBCHKNi8vo1cyYaLB74VjJVmHzZuFK IL1YccfPunj2q4aSF3T3BBx/2RTzyyYDU+MEnNw1c+fKzJ1XpOzMFJqsdId1x95V 62vPW+kDLIqFVdL5AIlQM+E5UQz60OtszGHfdef2ua8w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=g7ehOU CYOfOBydZN1oH4K2vmI89RzTq4dOBMNsHibd8=; b=imddKZB4sL7XRvtGTn1QcX /ZvdOEewI55TBcYo4OrDxc0DK6VY817hpdwdigdw83KIY55WFSG9FDElyZmbueH8 KyjlRKZcmlnAQ/C59wMHIDD6ljCm05RmJUPVhX0gmWqWFzRf7iZYWRdI0L9oMIsQ FlCZNnveBAAl7AvAQbxcqBVc1TTplIMdDyyLH8QYQjBNjkSF4Ox7BwsDFwGbjsh7 vGXYwzD/qh8HfqJK9fsenqYooEChJaMfL8dBHdQL2XSXjHPSsrqFuztvic7anhp5 OxWs9z/cfWHFIYJ1X8Cx/Jnai0CdG7MyI3hAA0SEzPkv0ea9N12xwqcBhq9T8rnQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrjeeigddukecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhggtgesghdtreertd dtvdenucfhrhhomheplfhonhgrthhhrghnucfhrhgvuggvrhhitghkshhonhcuoehjohhn rghthhgrnhesthgvrhhrrggtrhihphhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepuddtkedrgedrvddvke drudekkeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhonhgrthhhrghnsehtvghrrhgr tghrhihpthdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from terrabase.localnet (pool-108-4-228-188.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [108.4.228.188]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 158B210369; Sun, 5 May 2019 19:05:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Jonathan Frederickson To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:57 -0400 Message-ID: <2493358.OLn4tNdJs0@terrabase> In-Reply-To: <87muk0sf4e.fsf@netris.org> References: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> <87muk0sf4e.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4303375.LbeA925ssD"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35591 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 May 2019 19:36:42 -0400 Cc: 35591@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --nextPart4303375.LbeA925ssD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday, May 5, 2019 6:36:06 PM EDT Mark H Weaver wrote: > My knowledge of Flatpak is weak, but in general, foreign pre-compiled > binaries will not work on Guix unless they are statically linked. > Traditional dynamically-linked executables expect to find a dynamic > linker and system shared libraries in /lib or /lib64, which do not exist > on a Guix system. It is also fairly common for foreign binaries to > depend on standard files and programs in /usr, /bin, and /sbin, none of > which are present on a Guix system except for /bin/sh. I believe Flatpak applications are statically linked. (Or rather, individual applications may be dynamically linked, but they are eventually combined with a full OS image similarly to how Docker works.) > I'm sorry I don't have a better answer for you, but Guix was not > designed to run foreign pre-compiled binaries. If that's important to > you, it might be that Guix is not a good fit for you. It's not the most important thing to me; it may end up being one more reason for me to start attempting to package things for Guix! But it would still be nice to be able to run the same tooling that e.g. some Gnome developers are using to publish their apps across distros. (And the fact that Flatpak is packaged for Guix seems to imply that it should be possible to use it here.) > However, if your goal is to run Guix-compiled programs in a sandbox, > that's something we are certainly very interested in, and we could use > help. We have "guix container" as a building block, and I know that > some Guix users have experimented with running e.g. GNU IceCat within a > container. I don't know the current status of those efforts. Hopefully > someone more knowledgable in this area will chime in. While this isn't my immediate goal, this is also something that I'm interested in, if someone else knows more about this! --nextPart4303375.LbeA925ssD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEEIugt7kcBGD3Sv4NQN3jAIa4BEwFAlzPaB0ACgkQQN3jAIa4 BEz25Q//Rv4YHz7/k6FzI1QDhRHLaZzXPirFE7rCFsv3QHl/gYDXCr/cUF9+vs+W SrkGYVNErrG3qjHOncdQI3diT4Un9D98UcEILBWVX7aO5YCdv6Z5pTK1umzZgjiW sFKeS5+mV2ELBQZDd4OQRsiHIDLQRR3oY3ducKp9yjWsl9gHoFzqjRDZkE6TZgqX kYq0JvPQv3YUr9f0PUJN7ku180VjEjkiIU4LvmmunGStsXSOrv3Wt1VLrrTY0/2w wN7wY2LFzEI2gP3P4m1GMd7cMrL231uIk0cmT0elV+aYABw2poR6Hsa9mo88myjQ yxN2mzmp7kNeb9N8Mr8OKKpvhPl96MIGs/C1bqyZP0FNI6mkTwBDisJr8rENWVUy fTlXxTexICOx1sdgATHB5kKMzYUKg+6seoVJAOT/su42Z3CDGEVLZZYy0kdxJovz aNStg/bVpQoBciF42cc6uXCFfC5iVj8H5bJxoThxG7N4g6v3ZYubpY10Z12jOSPO R0vFYfjMy3oFoVQdDTIZ8qU7gO0JbhRySw9GQcXPJV/LHZApH4lBRsTjYcJBZri3 fR8g2raaw0Otsa0USXKFHUma6Izi48usLKXKepXXVkSgcKZFgTZsSo+TEp0uU/u8 +lqySoMwTT/GWsAt0HFNeia8PtrmK5/MTClpolutjD8XZANr0EE= =l31F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4303375.LbeA925ssD-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 31 06:50:33 2019 Received: (at 35591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2019 10:50:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQ82D-0002SS-4Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:50:33 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:38181) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQ828-0002SB-PO for 35591@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:50:31 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379E621B8C; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:50:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:50:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sturm.com.au; h= from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=2DOkKR2LqMeP7tfpGAjp4Q42r/ o2lKlySfzo67D1nqo=; b=AtE/lZaoyDSDlddn7rLh1iPaPL8zNWkC97mNL1NFFi G/viRhatAZhRgQA9JXBGUtikTDPyUu59UU7uy0IeMVt537GcSx03i2BRQpvLwY9h LDX4A3VAtqnR/qgNVrfTx3jTWVXNxTnAMcEv5TELPiLMU2xy1TS8dtqTIwlXsjfu 5T+rf0PPTTVOnpzv5sYjqdOkKN4QLB21BUTawlC3wEgi638LgFJQRtzbyQ9Hyc70 Y5VpQeDBU5tWBqT17vTZ2LUsjlmWsBJbvWxPUHj0vpthd9KqWYRvZ9aalitAXpKd gP+5N9VahnXqu+bTSkq+liE8swQKV9wRuz802+qOVk6A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2DOkKR 2LqMeP7tfpGAjp4Q42r/o2lKlySfzo67D1nqo=; b=ATMjLQXUFp18SN7L2SSHyH dL3Qj72tuTZipbw4z9pQWhxUx5+hUak1Se8wVLEO2ajSeb3dpGgPBPhkA9zWrcea pTv2lXKTKrk5HGGZOh39EzVFMtmFe1AQKCbLqpCV97nd9fRTo8KDd8zg9UullyKF 3BfLsACYetjgkKaYf430J580wV56PqR6XjxhG9VY6gh1E/loiRLq9p0V2GzUl7vC umDZPsnWyJBTKV6HK+EbPZwqZlf0ZZ57q01a0AgzYfYiPfVhQsROK/5nWfgQ/3lg ePl4SBZYeYeclKP/H/o8UbE+sHHlC40gnUAS9XXOu+wElD231DvTU6fzrC13jiJA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddthedgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtsehgtderredtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeeuvghnucfu thhurhhmfhgvlhhsuceosggvnhesshhtuhhrmhdrtghomhdrrghuqeenucffohhmrghinh epfhhlrghthhhusgdrohhrghenucfkphepheekrdeirddukeegrddvvdegnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsvghnsehsthhurhhmrdgtohhmrdgruhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (58-6-184-224.dyn.iinet.net.au [58.6.184.224]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B3459306005C; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ddc962ff; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:50:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Ben Sturmfels To: "Jonathan Frederickson" Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add References: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:50:18 +1100 In-Reply-To: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> (Jonathan Frederickson's message of "Sun, 05 May 2019 16:05:25 -0400") Message-ID: <87pnid9ok5.fsf@sturm.com.au> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35591 Cc: 35591@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, 05 May 2019, Jonathan Frederickson wrote: > I'm attempting to use Flatpak on my Guix system, and I'm experiencing > segfaults when attempting to add a remote repo. Provided below are the > output of the command I'm attempting to run, as well as some info > about my system. I learnt on #guix IRC that flatpak works when run with the --user flag: $ flatpak --user remote-add --if-not-exists flathub https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo $ flatpak install flathub org.gnome.Builder $ flatpak run org.gnome.Builder The segfaulting behaviour is still a bug in my opinion, because it's extremely user un-friendly, and the requirement for --user is not obvious. Regards, Ben --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPn825zvdanEG+SAhAjwF4snAaPAFAl26vGoACgkQAjwF4snA aPCaeQ//THKTnk3DQ9Z2aL3balJaF5vky5CpOGvuLPxh78HNQmV8A6F6tHcDirWx kOGbpFPXDkxhs/oqUMom8ROFjz1wa0LjxjftJdidO12n9iOm9c+D7hC9pgPHn5tr c1dcHhv2DEQCsg3uJgnM9iMBS04rT0wQB1P5Mkni/T0HIzsBaUErKihq9j2YnNJd HiosWIoXaLIxkWkpdRnNkDh8/M2dHcdMK4f+DCB2uMTqR16sHI7AyGo1ON+YS1KE CLCMtFRFP2t2gWsSChYLHbjkk9Sydk2vCJE2d+Z40F7uGG7dFp3Qgkjr6aLi4lZj b+Xgbf36JNBuEnLjI7sHDOI3lysoOrQQLL7XljZ15qFYaYteNBsBHNoIqXhdkqvU lSlvGZVZ3ZXo3ekuSxpFiqykiyG9zgoER8g8jcRevsQ/ZlKJMW3LRRJ/bSJbGHYm idFTfF39X4d+LF4rK9iLHpgvMiPHK5D8Xn2mVFrs5aIlnddMV7BjuNXd6FX3u7f7 IH6JHs4LtbO/sqae5UlmDMxUqNHmgT+EAW7ttM7XZkgFsTHwVAwEjDgh4/MNErIp EwdT5Q75L74eDKWK9Ab52GxnzjUEa/5NhafLUrSgj9NuUql4icdpV+N2LgvxVV5X ImBj2at5ljP1gtE7M3sEASFeUyuLJRmyYNy7I6ZGv4oYDDZHg/8= =nxvD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 11 16:23:51 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 20:23:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYExr-00009K-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:23:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYExp-000097-UR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:23:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYExp-0006bb-Oq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:23:49 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYExn-0006j4-I1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:23:48 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589228625; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=nL6CecoqLWOCloz3kXEh6wgGgQVXTnCe4O4UcfkE1S/cqe5uuBlRvFQ9XhhH9M02ekai8Xejx9nNCm0oLa49xbQV5hhSbm4poxwpaW9lV7qWP8wTscbmSQUkmBXnHXgJbF8eh/vS4YYT9vdkhbbC7vFv8pS2rEcYts5iK4n41ec= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1589228625; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=4jfgIh/7LX/93eM22AJoRBSzXNDk0ChEFrM8u+Oxu7g=; b=G7xiHpwixDcBI4/Y4SdARf17cembdz6JgpGG3rsCMd1j8uQynxkdOF1zK1LKqMMUkVC5SaDR/tE+bBnTQerW0Xi4/cgpWTEDsJXMQeMgHKG0y90rj1EOj32pkomMhi/07l4junLBvua/ZXNYGqBbUJdUEeFotKbAg683EOrM4WY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1589228625; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=4jfgIh/7LX/93eM22AJoRBSzXNDk0ChEFrM8u+Oxu7g=; b=F7fx0xM4aBgEiOSC3eU5nXSK4F6jx1HfPajPWE4e8nnqDAQtaTV4s1Ws7NZUUa0Z NN8GYmHh5AT6wC4Z0YPz/Th9OPMubDCMTFJ7Z1PdN7MZzjFUu9EX+UFAgKF2Vri9q8P A5o7sclSq/DCOmpigbM+brHeLAZLxp1GWLgw1LWA= Received: from localhost (p54AD4A39.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.74.57]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1589228622974449.5613980041369; Mon, 11 May 2020 13:23:42 -0700 (PDT) References: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> <87pnid9ok5.fsf@sturm.com.au> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add In-reply-to: <87pnid9ok5.fsf@sturm.com.au> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 22:23:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87tv0m1ar8.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.53; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o53.zoho.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/11 16:23:45 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 35591@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Frederickson X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Ben Sturmfels writes: > On Sun, 05 May 2019, Jonathan Frederickson wrote: > >> I'm attempting to use Flatpak on my Guix system, and I'm experiencing >> segfaults when attempting to add a remote repo. Provided below are the >> output of the command I'm attempting to run, as well as some info >> about my system. > > I learnt on #guix IRC that flatpak works when run with the --user flag: > > $ flatpak --user remote-add --if-not-exists flathub https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo > $ flatpak install flathub org.gnome.Builder > $ flatpak run org.gnome.Builder > > The segfaulting behaviour is still a bug in my opinion, because it's > extremely user un-friendly, and the requirement for --user is not > obvious. Yes, segfaults are always bugs, unless you forced the program to load garbage. I traced the execution of flatpak and saw that it segfaults right after failing to created /var/lib/flatpak. Sure enough, after creating it manually the program no longer segfaults. -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 11 17:38:15 2020 Received: (at 35591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 21:38:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYG7r-00047e-Lg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:38:15 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21385) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYG7p-00047T-Rq for 35591@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:38:14 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589233090; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=T9/25MeQoBq8CHxeCG99DTLMr99Qo3vAojoxL2UO60wqvkH8o76CTitCwf94hMBeDm+EoBsLxbt7QEoHDHduuPUNrcLpshnN53YF0AB96UEFxc/q8GiVPGgetllly41naODiEyT2yXYjBV/AdkWBYCXPQBmoeKXNx9Bee7W8CIE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1589233090; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=ioSOF9wYzhoBP44F2+mxhus6Z7Brazjk2tG21pUU4AU=; b=bfj7Su3Dmf6TI5u7bJYsmsvDgjU9X7UmAKCd2z+sm3U3C3B1dZrjOC9ziILl6tINqcaAQ4oeApxrLkYYLCxNRTB/LNvGj7mwRszhqaBicfj0ybNPc4gsmCBSHyJTpa4Aflw/Fi6FOiVXE3GgkxxYhNzYHfpKkHCD1eQauyw7xpE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1589233090; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=ioSOF9wYzhoBP44F2+mxhus6Z7Brazjk2tG21pUU4AU=; b=gZ9Ej+06V9njL2gTsL067Fu3fTjCZlQzrSQu1XHTZUeagDeGUjm2jw+B2cfn48ZP AK6HJ1JEzPr+JXA0Y2dLl6B+6PHUYjfsY/APETv8z2z8ins+v7mnHF+nGK/EQhwFEY9 /fPskR+3muthmAtAvL3IiRH+/qBsSvhYvR6pgIXw= Received: from localhost (p54AD4A39.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.74.57]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1589233088308552.0743640096173; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:38:08 -0700 (PDT) References: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> <87pnid9ok5.fsf@sturm.com.au> <87tv0m1ar8.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: 35591@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add In-reply-to: <87tv0m1ar8.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1vq17b6.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35591 Cc: Jonathan Frederickson X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ben Sturmfels writes: > >> On Sun, 05 May 2019, Jonathan Frederickson wrote: >> >>> I'm attempting to use Flatpak on my Guix system, and I'm experiencing >>> segfaults when attempting to add a remote repo. Provided below are the >>> output of the command I'm attempting to run, as well as some info >>> about my system. >> >> I learnt on #guix IRC that flatpak works when run with the --user flag: >> >> $ flatpak --user remote-add --if-not-exists flathub https://flathub.org/= repo/flathub.flatpakrepo >> $ flatpak install flathub org.gnome.Builder >> $ flatpak run org.gnome.Builder >> >> The segfaulting behaviour is still a bug in my opinion, because it's >> extremely user un-friendly, and the requirement for --user is not >> obvious. > > Yes, segfaults are always bugs, unless you forced the program to > load garbage. > > I traced the execution of flatpak and saw that it segfaults right after > failing to created /var/lib/flatpak. Sure enough, after creating it > manually the program no longer segfaults. I reported this here: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/3612 I=E2=80=99d say we close this issue here, because the segfault isn=E2=80=99= t our fault. Thoughts? -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 14 01:21:43 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2020 05:21:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ6JT-00057z-57 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:21:43 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21333) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ6JR-00057q-5L for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:21:42 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589433698; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=S0d81/qeW4K6v1TjM6dn6d3G/ukZIz6UDQwgQSmbdppwStwSkViA/qw6T0FAMOiS5lT7ioLQQkGYU/g/O+RlwKr3lAwwc70Nmv89QDI6Y/mRLBsp+Y+O4lk7zHAxYp1PMJSZvpmAPgkGtVelW6ClTqEdSHD1D3pWh0kkPZraDF0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1589433698; h=Content-Type:Date:From:MIME-Version:Message-ID:To; bh=RCggIZHDufm59N5w6F4TlpGvdioC+ROIlqlAvFOSAt8=; b=IQZRaTNivpheivQhgmp1ZtKf5T6YLh8yqgIxj/Xy/X0kFP3NuCFLGPHs20sSyXEQzUCNqVrWX5nzS8iCM5g3hdHiCndh/DU7P6JaHl05l5OLZ2FJ9nXZueV/Aho2L5P8CIHrX3cw6BVE/et95FvP5T30G79r5icTF/gVimaQ3go= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1589433698; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=RCggIZHDufm59N5w6F4TlpGvdioC+ROIlqlAvFOSAt8=; b=Qts1MbNykYv7WbStcFNxqds00PKPFC7Jba1BuChGBUCco5g8beMjd1cxaE7pcJkJ 73DCkr4b0tiRNXqM6TzVAA+O9h2pzKVC+l+vaJ8QHNUTTmgt806NkwWR59fZ5O1vVEV G1fMk/UoFd2YJc6JUfC+VEVi4PcdmjFPmfL5EGdU= Received: from localhost (p54AD4B14.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.75.20]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1589433695664792.0032313680566; Wed, 13 May 2020 22:21:35 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.4; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:21:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo5fccrn.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 40489 35591 quit Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.53 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [136.143.188.53 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: elephly.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) merge 40489 35591 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 14 01:26:45 2020 Received: (at 35591-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2020 05:26:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ6OL-0005GC-B5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:26:45 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ6OJ-0005G4-5G for 35591-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:26:43 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589434000; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=QnnZuvuhnNNDxNMBc9v0Qdmy9vWhBctFtHPfuoSdUGjJbM9HPtqFDOld+qJF+SON7328WTkGsD0tQ2z456iJ7IPc+CS75tYjuL1hpihRUV1ykymoWhdtOMsCtomcGY2xDD70JFwZ83KwC6vT6tT/4b6C/qqA0qNAcAgrzcXDFI4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1589434000; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=ICtLfuTT7rqC302HAz+1zm+ikOo1EvhWdfzg/Zi1xaY=; b=QcqfHJyyNn7760pmNdbwML97+hCcSfKIVWXWm9MzeX+BTQSKZLoGRdXffoptpH6Fbl9qTdDRByH/uAbhbIJg0vHFRElU1uhkXAbN59EKB3Uhj+7yLWFaUWuqrewhVyRgcvrYNNf1jq+F/fh6KH20Wos7JI/Alaeq3I6rjFJvY5k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1589434000; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=ICtLfuTT7rqC302HAz+1zm+ikOo1EvhWdfzg/Zi1xaY=; b=ZHGX0ArY7FWTBY+1LCkJkDpD3tsEFwrISkPrgou6/JLVvWlJd9SFvV9mjIUCCmhe DX+t0jMe/6ZNSiaO5QtoxCNeIXCSthDymvCxK85yQB8aVqmfujpvl48/2wuXbd473eo Be1JKs3gexpmyV7r9fLgNuG3JvDFo84asSnMuOPE= Received: from localhost (p54ad4b14.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.75.20]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1589433998334713.254053335162; Wed, 13 May 2020 22:26:38 -0700 (PDT) References: <12034386-e609-4dec-997f-bbf6614d8482@www.fastmail.com> <87pnid9ok5.fsf@sturm.com.au> <87tv0m1ar8.fsf@elephly.net> <87r1vq17b6.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.4; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: 35591-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#35591: Segfault on flatpak remote-add In-reply-to: <87r1vq17b6.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 07:26:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1vnccj8.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35591-done Cc: Jonathan Frederickson X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ricardo Wurmus writes: > I reported this here: > > https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/3612 > > I=E2=80=99d say we close this issue here, because the segfault isn=E2=80= =99t our fault. Upstream has acknowledged and addressed the bug. Closing. --=20 Ricardo From unknown Mon Aug 11 18:16:17 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator