GNU bug report logs - #35586
GNOME Core Applications

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Raghav Gururajan <rvgn <at> disroot.org>
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Cc: 35586 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35586: GNOME
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:02:03 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Yeah! You could be right.

On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 11:05 +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzfl
> orian.de> wrote:
> You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of)
> Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany.  The same
> goes for Nautilus.  The terminal command is also still epiphany or
> nautilus. 
> I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I
> believe it is not. 
> I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name
> (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used
> epiphany now a days as a habit.
> Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic
> names.
> 
> Maybe gnome-web could be the real package’s name and there could be
> apackage called epiphany that propagates gnome-web, like the
> gnomemeta-package does?  Same for nautilus etc.
> Regards,Florian
> 

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.