GNU bug report logs -
#35586
GNOME Core Applications
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 03:23:27PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
> > On 5 May 2019 14:52, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> wrote:
> > > Well, they have two names and others frequently refer to them by
> > > e.g. Epiphany and not GNOME Web, including Epiphany developers.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, but the app shows up as Web in GNOME.
> >
>
> One example of GNOME Web being called Epiphany by GNOME developers is
> the same blog:
>
> https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2019/03/19/epiphany-technology-preview-upgrade-requires-manual-intervention/
>
> You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of)
> Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany. The same
> goes for Nautilus. The terminal command is also still epiphany or
> nautilus.
>
> I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I believe
> it is not.
I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used epiphany now a days as a habit.
Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic names.
>
>
>
> > > Of course, there are more non-packaged applications.
> > >
> > > I also remember
> > > https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/
> > > who says, for example, that gnome-tweaks is *not* core.
> > >
> >
> > What?? How else to enable/disable plugins/extensions in GNOME?
> >
>
> Well… GNOME has repeatedly tried to make simpler alternatives for
> installing extensions. I believe the current method is GNOME
> Software, but I am not sure.
>
> Regards,
> Florian
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 18 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.