GNU bug report logs -
#35551
package gcc does not depend on binutils and glibc
Previous Next
Reported by: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 22:58:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Thank you, Ludovic. It will be nice to have some additional fields computed with Internet databases like:
Tag->name
Tag->Relevance
Purpose: editor, viewer, library, development tool
Interface: gui app, console-only, console and gui, system calls
For every tag needs to determine relevance.
For example, package VLC:
Tag->name: video
Tag->relevance: 100
Tag->name: view
Tag->relevance: 90
and other tags
Purpose: viewer
Interface: gui app
This can give additional options for search or just improve sorting when user type f.e. ' guix search video viewer'
May 13, 2019 7:58 AM, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:
>
>> Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> writes:
>>
>>> Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>
>> If we add functionality that calls out to the network in response to a
>> package search, e.g. to query popularity ratings or package file
>> listings, we should make sure the user knows it's happening, and provide
>> a way to disable it. Some users may not want information about their
>> package searches to be leaked to the outside world.
>>> Good point.
>>>
>>> Would it be more acceptable, upon 'guix search', to download an incremental
>>> update of a package popularity database, and do the search locally? This
>>> way, only the fact that the user has been doing a 'guix search' would be
>>> leaked to the outside world, not the search term.
>>
>> Yes, that would address my concerns, although popularity ratings might
>> be compact enough and change slowly enough that it might be sufficient
>> to simply have them embedded in the Guix source code and manually
>> updated periodically.
>>
>> Popularity ratings would also be useful to set build priorities on our
>> build farms.
>>
>> The package file listings, on the other hand, are likely to be so large
>> that it's not practical to download an incremental update of all of
>> them.
>
> FWIW, I like that there’s a purely off-line mode for ‘guix search’, as
> is currently the case (after all, none of Guix relies on any single
> service so far, and I think that’s a nice property.)
>
> However, I think it’d be nice to have the option to enhance search
> results by resorting to external services—just like using a substitute
> service “enhances” the user experience.
>
> I agree that the approach should rather be to download a complete
> database and operate locally on it, rather than give the exact query to
> the server.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 88 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.