From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 04:57:10 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 08:57:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47685 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMU0D-00023r-VI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 04:57:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMU0C-00023f-No for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 04:57:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMU07-000622-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 04:57:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMU06-0000sb-Bo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 04:57:03 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMU05-00060X-FK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 04:57:02 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:52832 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMU05-000603-9Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 04:57:01 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC1E0360038 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 10:56:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1556873815; bh=XUdsZ9jiWMSwjiTrSdqzK3v9Oal27fyR8JhpqSRMSXw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=DQkNKaKGn+zvje6mLz/ihtprG94lu8ntPubX/F83TzHXxBbKnG27llzkdNMxVH9aR LKv++br5soroYMUPyUTyTjjXxrx1vNCjqgAwwOZ0zAaMneOmcQAaO7r1S/bCoMLULG IlrDwoKojHLwvroI1kVTT3WVFDBype9s9+QHxwnM= Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 10:56:55 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Installer does not add %base-packages Message-ID: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 5.45.111.108 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) When and only when the Newt installer creates a packages field in the operating-system configuration e.g. for nss-certs, it does not add %base-packages to the packages field. (When no packages field is created, %base-packages is added by default.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 06:08:41 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 10:08:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMV7R-0005qw-Cg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:08:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60275) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMV7P-0005qj-GR for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:08:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMV7K-0008IX-EY; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:08:34 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=55630 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMV7J-0002wY-SZ; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:08:34 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 14 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Fri, 3 May 2019 10:56:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > When and only when the Newt installer creates a packages field in the > operating-system configuration e.g. for nss-certs, it does not add > %base-packages to the packages field. (When no packages field is > created, %base-packages is added by default.) Ouch! That renders the installed system unusable, right? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 06:26:46 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 10:26:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVOw-0006Kz-Gf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:26:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVOq-0006Ke-Bx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:26:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVOl-0001eQ-6E for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:26:35 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=56188 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVOk-0004Lq-M6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:26:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 12:26:31 +0200 Message-Id: <87d0kzesvc.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #35541 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) severity 35541 serious From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 06:27:04 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 10:27:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVPD-0006Lw-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:27:04 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVP9-0006LM-7v for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:27:00 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556879168; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=IsVF1WKXNr7Z3ylTszEQmCImUhRRUUmXMZvEunGZshuwH2bE4YQTgFUrOf64jaI2x2LUESMt9pjroR5JAfMJmk3PG7/3GOGAXK6xf2DIkN9FzNjf7hIKJpPf4O5LTIVmOue10+ndK/mDkbzhZ6qP9Jmzo/xtx/W5gzWahnAgGY4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1556879168; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=cdllarkXcGw+DikcUYWDYo8wps4Pa/1QPy8r59yIsiY=; b=ZSrjr1RCrc7lWM/ax6GgY0Qyo4D71KVyUn4u2rNQwknryuSLf9b/qk2vfyJ5x+fvMDjLq7angYzEwFEz1rpEn8FjrnPZ2gwzmSc51BtJzx4YCcgbgb8HHeqrKhorn5DIUXxKt1IejLBOloWi+C9DvYxS0qGhJMbHXdvRwIKHzAc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1556879168; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=636; bh=cdllarkXcGw+DikcUYWDYo8wps4Pa/1QPy8r59yIsiY=; b=O9BWYu6NFYbCUHZQTsqQsFh3/fumEhtFVLvB7AsjxjO0HpevrLV3MAJuRbtkcE7z 4ELzIFULSfJcaZH73cfcTJ6SXGhVuoYwipiEa+A0PxmNJd+I1Si3xPBZZzcTupPSLZX mBYIoVzgHJcRNWPnpX8FV1sfLj8HMI/R36Fq1kyE= Received: from localhost (p54AD4EB5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.78.181]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1556879166761637.4347269006065; Fri, 3 May 2019 03:26:06 -0700 (PDT) References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages In-reply-to: <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 12:26:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org, "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > >> When and only when the Newt installer creates a packages field in the >> operating-system configuration e.g. for nss-certs, it does not add >> %base-packages to the packages field. (When no packages field is >> created, %base-packages is added by default.) > > Ouch! That renders the installed system unusable, right? This might explain a report that we=E2=80=99ve seen on IRC on release day w= here a person was unable to use coreutils. So yes, the system would be hardly usable. --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 06:30:57 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 10:30:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVSz-0007IP-20 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:30:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35687) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVSv-0007AK-Ua for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:30:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVSq-00057e-Cm; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:30:48 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=56194 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMVSp-0003zT-QS; Fri, 03 May 2019 06:30:48 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 12:30:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:32 +0200") Message-ID: <874l6beso9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > >> When and only when the Newt installer creates a packages field in the >> operating-system configuration e.g. for nss-certs, it does not add >> %base-packages to the packages field. (When no packages field is >> created, %base-packages is added by default.) > > Ouch! That renders the installed system unusable, right? I did a full install for a bare-bones-like system with =E2=80=98nss-certs= =E2=80=99 selected during the install. The resulting system has only =E2=80=98guix= =E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98herd=E2=80=99 as useful commands in /run/current-system/profile/bi= n. You can log in but Coreutils commands etc. are missing. You can run: guix install coreutils grep sed findutils which solves the problem. It=E2=80=99s a serious issue nonetheless. :-/ Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 07:52:43 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 11:52:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWk7-00048f-FW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:52:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWk6-00048U-BY for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:52:42 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWk0-0006Zr-L5; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:52:36 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=56254 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWjz-0001pK-WE; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:52:36 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 13:52:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Fri, 3 May 2019 10:56:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87zho3dabj.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > When and only when the Newt installer creates a packages field in the > operating-system configuration e.g. for nss-certs, it does not add > %base-packages to the packages field. (When no packages field is > created, %base-packages is added by default.) This is fixed here: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3Decb0df6817eb3767e= 6b4dcf1945f3c2dfbe3b44f I=E2=80=99m keeping the bug open until we=E2=80=99ve come up with a plan. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 07:59:23 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 11:59:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWqZ-0004Ik-JM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:59:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56601) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWqX-0004IY-OT for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:59:22 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWqS-0006Yr-7z; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:59:16 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=56258 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMWqR-00073v-Mv; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:59:16 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 13:59:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 12:26:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org, "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, I=E2=80=99d like us to better estimate the impact, communicate about workarounds, and have a bug-fix release plan. Like I wrote, in a bare-bones installation, Coreutils & co. are missing, but one can work around it by running, say: guix install coreutils grep sed findutils (Programs like =E2=80=98sudo=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98passwd=E2=80=99 are avai= lable despite the bug because they are in /run/setuid-programs.) Has anyone tried on a GNOME, Xfce, or ratpoison install? I wonder if the problem is visible there (until you open a terminal, that is.) I think we should email info-guix@gnu.org and possibly write a post on the blog within at most two days with an explanation of the issue, workarounds, proper fix (which is to edit the config file and reconfigure), and an ETA for the bug-fix release. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 12:08:31 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 16:08:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMajf-0006Mn-CM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:31 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:47581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMajd-0006MY-F7 for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:30 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2784ED; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:08:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=qCgzmAffjaJrkhh5J8QtARRrYT51NEOsya4TX94WZ JI=; b=EAS5pXkbobdV4YyADE7iQspvfh8n2tWvhYowGnRXCB2Utst5k1416dej0 ncNVf43yiKy2kGGbYJY0Qepg+ZUBLJrQswh4E4bgXaZNthcm2UhzcMJ6gVfYF4JG 8APza5VuZCZWOQLaCXYIfPNxOHxe0q7XiB5yIW6jgEogBBcirAIt2TQqHz+iFRlN BsagfVYu4xm6QyghKl63e/QoMW4JnlsEAOXYoDmyVcNKPjRLgpMkiRGrFo8lNj7i iwOPAnUNuxmkYSyrvIqswnffl0D+piTmx5s+CW5mgerHH0MNN0WiaUO26oYkATiz X1T5xYvFFHqTH+lKEF+fBf3z2s3iw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrjedugddutdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhimhho thhhhicuufgrmhhplhgvuceoshgrmhhplhgvthesnhhghihrohdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ejgedrudduiedrudekiedrgeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsrghmphhl vghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from mrblack (74-116-186-44.qc.dsl.ebox.net [74.116.186.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9721C103CC; Fri, 3 May 2019 12:08:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Timothy Sample To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 13:59:13 +0200") Message-ID: <87pnozr05m.fsf@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Ludo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Has anyone tried on a GNOME, Xfce, or ratpoison install? I wonder if > the problem is visible there (until you open a terminal, that is.) I just tried Xfce and it does not work. Adding =E2=80=9C%base-packages=E2= =80=9D back into the config from the terminal fixed it, though. -- Tim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 14:42:30 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 18:42:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMd8g-0001ib-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:30 -0400 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:47773) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMd8e-0001iP-EH for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:29 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E91465; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ZYExYK7EKzUa2aBOBC54UuI8j6r1ZX4VdltLEw0vQ bU=; b=IjBidk1H2NfPecRUSubO1d2Kf1+nx14w29V33GNyNt4r/6ukxJBaSSVGk uSXbccqpKAuUnLRLdGoTWoB7bkRHi+xt2AjHVujvRkETVlkPFyIpmhEDhZzUwF5Q jGrDgdRfxf5e296oVpW/fSNqDPLYqvqISkRcE+5slMmIK0RFsx+KuH8FF8wRP11y 6VpR05jcGp+dfRFI1PkJ8+3n3LOFk5sfxXoiMgHnaxHLCLzDssI5k2W5Ey3+dIf1 AtjBTVLiup5cHrXxTyNvfnbWv/t88N9UwMn8FfSU+9kR61IFOVH1m3+12ECx+N8C vpmOXLz3i4PAbortCPKzqq8e6acGA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrjedugddufeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhimhho thhhhicuufgrmhhplhgvuceoshgrmhhplhgvthesnhhghihrohdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ejgedrudduiedrudekiedrgeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsrghmphhl vghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from mrblack (74-116-186-44.qc.dsl.ebox.net [74.116.186.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7C2D8103D0; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:42:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Timothy Sample To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnozr05m.fsf@ngyro.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pnozr05m.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:21 -0400") Message-ID: <87lfznqt0z.fsf@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, Timothy Sample writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Has anyone tried on a GNOME, Xfce, or ratpoison install? I wonder if >> the problem is visible there (until you open a terminal, that is.) > > I just tried Xfce and it does not work. Adding =E2=80=9C%base-packages= =E2=80=9D back > into the config from the terminal fixed it, though. Just finished testing GNOME and it works. -- Tim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 15:20:05 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 19:20:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49686 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdj3-0002cW-Hf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 15:20:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44261) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdj0-0002bw-7V for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 15:20:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdiu-0002F1-Cc; Fri, 03 May 2019 15:19:56 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60894 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMdip-0006ex-Bu; Fri, 03 May 2019 15:19:53 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Timothy Sample Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnozr05m.fsf@ngyro.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 14 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 21:19:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnozr05m.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 12:08:21 -0400") Message-ID: <874l6b9wh7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Tim, Timothy Sample skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Has anyone tried on a GNOME, Xfce, or ratpoison install? I wonder if >> the problem is visible there (until you open a terminal, that is.) > > I just tried Xfce and it does not work. As in you can=E2=80=99t log in at all? > Just finished testing GNOME and it works. OK. Thanks for testing, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 16:39:44 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 20:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMey7-0004Ve-T7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:39:44 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:44111) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMey3-0004VJ-DQ for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:39:42 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8A853D; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:39:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 May 2019 16:39:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Y5vkUhyrhqXr9qqfI/HJoOfNFnLbpSbRHkBclXIuw 18=; b=QRYl7ptpBjX5MGWIUxZmC4+XXp+kwZ8kO+Y5wfrlFmaaFeQZ93XkvaYK6 Sx/erqfkXepuYrOa6in0u3fIkotH5FpxABnob9WVCKTGnE+mkv/82S3quXM2rNLW N1Hxvdn7bYeH53glgYtshK0Tnaz/HMH1drbFT7iBg2LD8wf75e53HpI9NydA1kkT uh8/NvcGS0rokF8RFUp0Oia1tfKTNnlwNaeg7TUKCR68l0Yk3Bf9gxdrfaHMezIp C677y1XUpGGhVsHwn8UNUL2B4JFgxckC8kNTWscjPjfky/slBcMQhKZmPOSJXEsr n62ojkR1ZWmZLoUT+0qm4DOkZcLTQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrjedugdduheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtgfesthhqredttderjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhimhho thhhhicuufgrmhhplhgvuceoshgrmhhplhgvthesnhhghihrohdrtghomheqnecukfhppe ejgedrudduiedrudekiedrgeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsrghmphhl vghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from mrblack (74-116-186-44.qc.dsl.ebox.net [74.116.186.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AC8421037C; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:39:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Timothy Sample To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnozr05m.fsf@ngyro.com> <874l6b9wh7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 16:39:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874l6b9wh7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 21:19:48 +0200") Message-ID: <87h8abqnlp.fsf@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, > Timothy Sample skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >>> Has anyone tried on a GNOME, Xfce, or ratpoison install? I wonder if >>> the problem is visible there (until you open a terminal, that is.) >> >> I just tried Xfce and it does not work. > > As in you can=E2=80=99t log in at all? Exactly. It kicks me back out to GDM immediately. I assume that =E2=80=9Cxfce4-session=E2=80=9D tries to find some utility in $PATH and fai= ls when it can=E2=80=99t find it. -- Tim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 08:40:42 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 12:40:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50529 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMty6-00028J-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 08:40:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44212) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMty4-000285-FL for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 08:40:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMtxx-0004g4-Vt; Sat, 04 May 2019 08:40:34 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35566 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMtxw-0003wc-VZ; Sat, 04 May 2019 08:40:33 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 14:40:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 03 May 2019 13:59:13 +0200") Message-ID: <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org, "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > I think we should email info-guix@gnu.org and possibly write a post on > the blog within at most two days with an explanation of the issue, > workarounds, proper fix (which is to edit the config file and > reconfigure), and an ETA for the bug-fix release. Unless there are objections, I will apply the patch below to the manual in the =E2=80=98version-1.0.0=E2=80=99 branch and update the on-line copies= of the manual. That way the issue and workaround should be immediately visible to someone who follows the =E2=80=9CInstallation instructions=E2=80=9D link= on the download page. (This text won=E2=80=99t be translated, but we=E2=80=99ll h= ave to live with it I guess.) I=E2=80=99ll also send roughly the same text to info-guix. Please tell me what you think! I think we can publish a release in two to four weeks. It should be an easier one anyway. We should take advantage of that time to gather installation bug reports and to address them, and also to see how we can automate the release process further. Thoughts? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 3b0517c5e3..2f1caf4659 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -1774,6 +1774,11 @@ on a machine. Guix, as a package manager, can also be installed on top of a running GNU/Linux system, @pxref{Installation}. +@quotation Important Note +@xref{Guided Graphical Installation}, on how to work around a bug that affects +the graphical installer in version 1.0.0. +@end quotation + @ifinfo @quotation Note @c This paragraph is for people reading this from tty2 of the @@ -1992,6 +1997,56 @@ dependencies of your system configuration can be downloaded. See the The graphical installer is a text-based user interface. It will guide you, with dialog boxes, through the steps needed to install GNU@tie{}Guix System. +@quotation Important Note +Due to a @uref{https://issues.guix.info/issue/35541, bug}, the graphical +installer of Guix 1.0.0 may produce a system configuration where essential +commands such as @command{ls} or @command{grep} are missing. A new release +will be published in the coming weeks. Here is how you can work around it in +the meantime on your freshly installed system: + +@itemize +@item +Install packages that provide those commands, along with the text editor of +your choice (for example, @code{emacs} or @code{vim}): + +@example +guix install coreutils findutils grep procps sed emacs vim +@end example + +At this point, the essential commands you would expect are available. + +@item +Open your configuration file with your editor of choice, for example +@command{emacs}, running as root: + +@example +sudo emacs /etc/config.scm +@end example + +@item +Change the @code{packages} field to add the ``base packages'' to the list of +globally-installed packages, such that your configuration looks like this: + +@lisp +(operating-system + ;; ... snip ... + (packages (append (list (specification->package "nss-certs")) + %base-packages)) + ;; ... snip ... + ) +@end lisp + +@item +Reconfigure the system so that your new configuration is in effect: + +@example +sudo guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm +@end example +@end itemize + +We apologize for this embarrassing mistake that we made. +@end quotation + The first dialog boxes allow you to set up the system as you use it during the installation: you can choose the language, keyboard layout, and set up networking, which will be used during the installation. The image below shows --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 09:32:31 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 13:32:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50586 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMumF-0005Zf-8d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 09:32:31 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:40414 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMumD-0005ZV-1T for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 09:32:30 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE5BA360038; Sat, 4 May 2019 15:32:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1556976739; bh=zFi218ixG8xj6X8jgSPH6iiISbwDqlIu8wgUW2FLYE4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=0GUmFx0+EEvku9ln03brdZ5e3Qd9ziwdnsZkjFyMa1AgIGFbpeRDl8fOZknsWuYKD ECDdS23VQc++ayMHT5m09LagrW+HqBnv1TT2duZFrKwQ/88drPFINSiBPVEI07U5r6 mA0aqXBWEGB51wSM5lU8VEFTS7nfmI/YvOACqIDo= Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 15:32:19 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages Message-ID: <20190504133219.kwwbhx36irce7ohk@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 02:40:30PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Please tell me what you think! > It is a good text. However, I find it more tragic that Xfce and MATE do not work than that these commands are missing until installed, but it depends on the audience I guess. Regards, Florian From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 10:54:35 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 14:54:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMw3d-0007re-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 10:54:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43501) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMw3c-0007rN-2M for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 10:54:32 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMw3W-0003uw-I1; Sat, 04 May 2019 10:54:26 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35994 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMw3V-0008Eu-UN; Sat, 04 May 2019 10:54:26 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> <20190504133219.kwwbhx36irce7ohk@pelzflorian.localdomain> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 15 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 16:54:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190504133219.kwwbhx36irce7ohk@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Sat, 4 May 2019 15:32:19 +0200") Message-ID: <87imuq2rts.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 02:40:30PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Please tell me what you think! >>=20 > > It is a good text. However, I find it more tragic that Xfce and MATE > do not work than that these commands are missing until installed, but > it depends on the audience I guess. Yeah, but note that the Xfce failure is due to this bug (confirmed by running =E2=80=98guix system vm desktop.tmpl=E2=80=99 with the attached pat= ch.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/gnu/system/examples/desktop.tmpl b/gnu/system/examples/desktop.tmpl index 3931bad60d..ff6e4e37dd 100644 --- a/gnu/system/examples/desktop.tmpl +++ b/gnu/system/examples/desktop.tmpl @@ -45,18 +45,14 @@ (users (cons (user-account (name "bob") (comment "Alice's brother") + (password (crypt "foo" "$6$abc")) (group "users") (supplementary-groups '("wheel" "netdev" "audio" "video"))) %base-user-accounts)) ;; This is where we specify system-wide packages. - (packages (append (list - ;; for HTTPS access - nss-certs - ;; for user mounts - gvfs) - %base-packages)) + (packages '()) ;; Add GNOME and Xfce---we can choose at the log-in screen ;; by clicking the gear. Use the "desktop" services, which --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 11:03:51 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 15:03:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMwCd-00087B-NQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 11:03:51 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:40572 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMwCc-000873-Cs for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 11:03:50 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1210A360038; Sat, 4 May 2019 17:03:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1556982220; bh=y8BvypCCvAXURvmMyAwoyj233zIgs0O/GL8O6d11mCw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=H4iHR3puk/8gclKw7C/+1GEX/9IhZYQruFeNQH+fX00Jhlz+qyw8jF+vx3HWxj6Iu Tb4QijBN1JI9DfNNbDqSfAou9uonJAW3I8h2+68rcRnUfTGjTCVEOQh4p6I/sBDnX6 zF40gcsvNwN4M0rJbR49mXtOGrAp+ezVqJuTkjSk= Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 17:03:39 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages Message-ID: <20190504150339.66yicn4ufiqm4e2a@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> <20190504133219.kwwbhx36irce7ohk@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuq2rts.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87imuq2rts.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 04:54:23PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 02:40:30PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Please tell me what you think! > >> > > > > It is a good text. However, I find it more tragic that Xfce and MATE > > do not work than that these commands are missing until installed, but > > it depends on the audience I guess. > > Yeah, but note that the Xfce failure is due to this bug (confirmed by > running ‘guix system vm desktop.tmpl’ with the attached patch.) > Hmm. Maybe mention that it fixes Xfce then. Regards, Florian From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 12:49:34 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 16:49:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMxqw-0002NA-Ih for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:49:34 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21255) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMxqv-0002N3-Fj for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:49:33 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556988555; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=DFFvB/NcoqBU8MPzT2CO8SuJg6V1VQmePPvQ1k5STeOgwIcf9uSK3FtTAGIGbfXuCCr+3qBv6FrMxE+1jKnj2XYtaqF8QEGxk49lUl4vwsTwRjG4hjd60I8cfIHfzTwRNrNKUUVD4IQteoRAinP/QJbx5RodcZ5gjD5+rurlwzk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1556988555; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=C4d2Z0YchhCGpIgYrSrpns3yVBc1twb/35jF37stt9I=; b=VoQSHLeIQugcnum2Uk2yBlSA6DWluqcJzaUdjKPZZfmd9fZIlq+1gAvhlbnnh6WV//joelPwpaJdG5JrO5zkVbo5CMQkWbo7WEencMcrbmIBIE5n0SUdi2dJfmhudAIXveelDC2pKTxWjAtAMSnw864KRsSrm4wY6oGySSgNpYQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1556988555; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=1142; bh=C4d2Z0YchhCGpIgYrSrpns3yVBc1twb/35jF37stt9I=; b=Auam3rAlaiZd+AtMzPORuwqphUL9SVr8GsHR4LT8h6me15PrxIFcNVT9whPWc/IE n/o10BLvyK9xVEIKWmS3eEGsgyfDOG+PhyX/Ae4VhtIelu9cKBup6U/npScIvxlQ0W3 E+UIYdFDtDZNYmK3GDDxDIoDSilV18JTrVKHSwm4= Received: from localhost (p54AD4205.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.66.5]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1556988553266918.6434111184503; Sat, 4 May 2019 09:49:13 -0700 (PDT) References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages In-reply-to: <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 18:49:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87tveaf9mi.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: 35541@debbugs.gnu.org, "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > >> I think we should email info-guix@gnu.org and possibly write a post on >> the blog within at most two days with an explanation of the issue, >> workarounds, proper fix (which is to edit the config file and >> reconfigure), and an ETA for the bug-fix release. > > Unless there are objections, I will apply the patch below to the manual > in the =E2=80=98version-1.0.0=E2=80=99 branch and update the on-line copi= es of the > manual. That way the issue and workaround should be immediately visible > to someone who follows the =E2=80=9CInstallation instructions=E2=80=9D li= nk on the > download page. (This text won=E2=80=99t be translated, but we=E2=80=99ll= have to live > with it I guess.) > > I=E2=80=99ll also send roughly the same text to info-guix. > > Please tell me what you think! This looks good. I just have a tiny nit to pick: > +We apologize for this embarrassing mistake that we made. I=E2=80=99d remove =E2=80=9Cthat we made=E2=80=9D. I=E2=80=99m looking forward to 1.0.1 :) --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 17:17:08 2019 Received: (at 35541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 21:17:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hN21s-0005Zc-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 17:17:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hN21p-0005Z0-P7 for 35541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 17:17:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hN21k-0004Lp-K9; Sat, 04 May 2019 17:17:00 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=36706 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hN21k-0004hG-61; Sat, 04 May 2019 17:17:00 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" Subject: Re: bug#35541: Installer does not add %base-packages References: <20190503085655.fx3oide7huydf337@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuretpb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpvhm11.fsf@elephly.net> <87muk3da0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvea4cld.fsf@gnu.org> <20190504133219.kwwbhx36irce7ohk@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imuq2rts.fsf@gnu.org> <20190504150339.66yicn4ufiqm4e2a@pelzflorian.localdomain> Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 23:16:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190504150339.66yicn4ufiqm4e2a@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Sat, 4 May 2019 17:03:39 +0200") Message-ID: <874l692a45.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35541 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35541@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 04:54:23PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: >> > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 02:40:30PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> >> Please tell me what you think! >> >>=20 >> > >> > It is a good text. However, I find it more tragic that Xfce and MATE >> > do not work than that these commands are missing until installed, but >> > it depends on the audience I guess. >>=20 >> Yeah, but note that the Xfce failure is due to this bug (confirmed by >> running =E2=80=98guix system vm desktop.tmpl=E2=80=99 with the attached = patch.) >>=20 > > Hmm. Maybe mention that it fixes Xfce then. Done, pushed to =E2=80=98version-1.0.0=E2=80=99, and published: https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Guided-Graphical-Instal= lation.html Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 18 08:04:03 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2019 12:04:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hRy4J-0004CE-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 08:04:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48261) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hRy4I-0004BV-QZ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 08:04:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRy4D-00071M-Nr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 08:03:57 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=33916 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hRy4D-0001T1-8i for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2019 08:03:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 14:03:55 +0200 Message-Id: <87woioufys.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #35541 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 35541 fixed close 35541 From unknown Sat Aug 16 15:56:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator