GNU bug report logs - #35513
(setq gnus-thread-sort-functions '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number)) seems not to work always.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #29 received at 35513 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
To: Uwe Brauer <oub.oub.oub <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 35513 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35513: (setq gnus-thread-sort-functions
 '(gnus-thread-sort-by-number)) seems not to work always.
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:13:07 -0700

Uwe Brauer <oub.oub.oub <at> gmail.com> writes:

>>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>
>    > Uwe Brauer <oub.oub.oub <at> gmail.com> writes:
>    >> So you don't find it annoying and to difficult to implement and maybe
>    >> to debug?
>
>    > I think breaking threads on subject change is a misfeature, so enhancing
>    > that misfeature doesn't seem appropriate.
>
> So you are saying that if I change the subject line in a tread, I should
> not break the thread?
>
> I came to this feature by a recommendation of John Wiley.
>
> If you change the subject, change the thread, for me that looks
> logically, you say, no?

To me, no. I've always felt that threads should be built by reference,
not by subject. To me, reference headers feel like a "real" connection,
vs subject headers, which only happen to coincide.

Obviously this is totally subjective, and I only chime in to say that
other people (me) have a different "logical" interpretation of the
situation. But it's one of those areas of Gnus that everyone will have
different (strongly-held) opinions about.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.