GNU bug report logs - #35466
26.2; Feature request: add clone-indirect-buffer-other-frame to C-x 5 c

Previous Next

Full log

Message #18 received at 35466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ilja Kocken <i.j.kocken <at> uu.nl>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 35466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#35466: 26.2; Feature request: add
 clone-indirect-buffer-other-frame to C-x 5 c
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:32:12 +0100

Thanks, sounds good to me! I've stopped using this functionality 
myself and have moved back from frames-only-mode to using plain 
emacs windows again :).

Kind regards,

Ilja

Lars Ingebrigtsen writes:

> Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:
>
>> The only problem with this binding is that bug#34715 proposed
>> to use the same binding C-x 5 c for clone-frame.
>
> That hasn't happened...  but I'm not quite sure that this would 
> be
> generally useful.  That is, adding -other-buffer and 
> -other-frame
> variations to a bunch of commands doesn't seem like a good 
> long-term
> design solution -- solving this instead through 
> `display-buffer-alist'
> etc seems more scalable.
>
> So I'm closing this as a "wontfix".


--
Ilja Kocken, MSc. | PhD candidate Stratigraphy & Palaeontology |
Earth Sciences | Utrecht University | Vening Meinesz Gebouw A
Room 3.62 | Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht | i.j.kocken <at> uu.nl

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.