GNU bug report logs - #35388
[PATCH] gnu: julia: Update to 1.1.0.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 35388 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, nixo <nicolo <at> nixo.xyz>
Subject: [bug#35388] [PATCH] gnu: julia: Update to 1.1.0
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 10:43:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello guix!
After the longest week ever, I'm back. I had to power off my build server
because is a bit noisy, and building llvm on a laptop is slow.

Finally, I upgraded julia to 1.1.1 (even if 1.2 is already at rc2).

I know inline patches are preferred but I don't have access to my email
client right now.

@Ludvic, as you asked, I placed the llvm-patches in an "origin" field, with
2 small helpers functions used to generate the url and the field.

Let me know if this is better, hopefully julia will find its way into guix
:)

Many many thanks, and sorry again for the late response,

Nicolò

Il giorno lun 27 mag 2019 alle ore 20:06 Nicolò Balzarotti <
anothersms <at> gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Hi, thanks for the bump.
>
> Sure but in the meanwhile they upgraded to 1.1.1 .-.
>
> I promise I'll have a look again this week ;)
>
> Nicolò
>
> Il giorno lun 27 mag 2019 alle ore 14:27 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
> ha scritto:
>
>> Hi Nicolò,
>>
>> Did you have a chance to look into it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.
>>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>> > Hi Nicolò,
>> >
>> > Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>> >
>> >> One second problem regards the llvm patches. They should be generic
>> (as stated
>> >> in the link in the patch, [2]) but are actually needed to compile
>> julia (so I
>> >> cannot use pure system llvm, but I don't feel like applying them to
>> system
>> >> llvm all by myself).
>> >
>> > OK.
>> >
>> >> The .patch files are available in the julia source package: is it ok
>> to place them in the patches folder or shuld I fetch the julia source and
>> extract them during build?
>> >
>> > It would be best if they could be downloaded from upstream.  For that
>> > you could use one ‘origin’ for each patch and use them directly in the
>> > ‘patches’ field.  Alternately, if that’s more convenient, you could add
>> > one ‘origin’ for the whole repository, and add an ‘apply-patches’ to the
>> > ‘llvm-julia’ package that would pick patches in the right place.
>> >
>> > Could you also try to provide a commit log listing all the changes that
>> > this patch makes?  You can read ‘git log’ for examples or see
>> > <
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html
>> >.
>> >
>> > Other than that I think it should be ready to go, and I’m really happy a
>> > newer Julia package is around the corner!
>> >
>> > Thank you, and apologies for the delay!
>> >
>> > Ludo’.
>>
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-gnu-julia-Update-to-1.1.1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.