GNU bug report logs - #35382
I found a bug in guix pull \o/ (maybe)

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:12:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 35382 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 35382 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#35382; Package guix. (Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Bug guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: I found a bug in guix pull \o/ (maybe)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 18:10:53 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guix,

I ran into the following running ‘guix pull’ from the 0.16.0 
aarch64 binary tarball on the original Overdrive OpenSUSE.

Apologies for the truncation, but this happened over the serial 
console.  I'm running ‘guix pull’ with output redirection now, and 
it's been running for a suspiciously long time without errors…

Kind regards,

T G-R

=== 8< ---

In ./guix/monads.scm:
   482:9  8 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
  573:13  7 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
  1667:8  6 (_ _)
 1690:38  5 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 3680d420>)
In ./guix/packages.scm:
  936:16  4 (cache! #<weak-table 421/883> #<package 
  guile-ssh <at> 0.11?> ?)
In ./guix/grafts.scm:
   314:4  3 (graft-derivation #<store-connection 256.99 3680d420> 
   # ?)
   192:4  2 (references-oracle #<store-connection 256.99 
   3680d420> #)
  201:20  1 (_ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
 1203:15  0 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 3680d420> _ _)

./guix/store.scm:1203:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args 
`(#<condition &store-protocol-error [message: "build .
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program 
'/gnu/store/j3sfsynqhkdcp4gjr558xdfqszjb6n45-compute-guix-derivat'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: 
"56a4858210ebaf45c32dc99bdfbd12b9bc5a234e"; system: "aarch64;
host version: "0.16.0"; pull-version: 1).
Please report it by email to <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#35382; Package guix. (Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:17:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 35382 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 35382 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35382: I found a bug in guix pull \o/ (maybe)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:16:31 +0200
Hi Tobias,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> skribis:

> In ./guix/monads.scm:
>    482:9  8 (_ _)
> In ./guix/gexp.scm:
>   573:13  7 (_ _)
> In ./guix/store.scm:
>   1667:8  6 (_ _)
>  1690:38  5 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 3680d420>)
> In ./guix/packages.scm:
>   936:16  4 (cache! #<weak-table 421/883> #<package guile-ssh <at> 0.11?>
> ?)
> In ./guix/grafts.scm:
>    314:4  3 (graft-derivation #<store-connection 256.99 3680d420>  #
> ?)
>    192:4  2 (references-oracle #<store-connection 256.99  3680d420> #)
>   201:20  1 (_ _ _)
> In ./guix/store.scm:
>  1203:15  0 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 3680d420> _ _)
>
> ./guix/store.scm:1203:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args
> `(#<condition &store-protocol-error [message: "build .
> guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
> '/gnu/store/j3sfsynqhkdcp4gjr558xdfqszjb6n45-compute-guix-derivat'
> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> "56a4858210ebaf45c32dc99bdfbd12b9bc5a234e"; system: "aarch64;
> host version: "0.16.0"; pull-version: 1).
> Please report it by email to <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>.

Often there’s a more useful hint above; could you paste the missing bits
that came just before?  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.




Reply sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 35382-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: 35382-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35382: I found a bug in guix pull \o/ (maybe)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:34:31 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> ./guix/store.scm:1203:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args
> `(#<condition &store-protocol-error [message: "build .
> guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
> '/gnu/store/j3sfsynqhkdcp4gjr558xdfqszjb6n45-compute-guix-derivat'
> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> "56a4858210ebaf45c32dc99bdfbd12b9bc5a234e"; system: "aarch64;
> host version: "0.16.0"; pull-version: 1).

I can avoid this by pulling from 
--commit=15dca289b8bd1418c5f5f3b545cb497497cad02e.  Then I can 
pull to HEAD just fine.

Closing since that's a good enough work-around for me :-)

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#35382; Package guix. (Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:38:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 35382 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 35382 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#35382: I found a bug in guix pull \o/ (maybe)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 15:37:44 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludo',

Oh, I just replied to close this bug since it was easily (if 
slowly) worked around by using an intermediate commit.

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Often there’s a more useful hint above; could you paste the 
> missing bits
> that came just before?  :-)

Heh.  Nope.  Managed to overwrite the log file with unexpected 
success.

Thanks,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 22 May 2019 11:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 29 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.