From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 05:11:51 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2019 09:11:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hFxeZ-0004HM-0I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 05:11:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hFxeX-0004HB-Nw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 05:11:50 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFxeS-0006zA-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 05:11:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFxeR-0004rw-EI for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 05:11:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFxeQ-0006yf-DU for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 05:11:43 -0400 Received: from smtp01.univ-lille1.fr ([2001:660:4401:100::19]:56280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFxeQ-0006xv-3v for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 05:11:42 -0400 Received: from smtps2.univ-lille1.fr (smtps2.univ-lille1.fr [193.49.225.53]) by smtp01.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id x3F9BQ7d014567 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:11:26 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (13.135.3.93.rev.sfr.net [93.3.135.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps2.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id x3F9BOeq023911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:11:25 +0200 From: jfbu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:11:23 +0200 To: bug-auctex@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-USTL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USTL-MailScanner-ID: x3F9BQ7d014567 X-USTL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-USTL-MailScanner-From: jfbu@free.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:660:4401:100::19 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Emacs : GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0, Carbon = Version 157 AppKit 1265.21) of 2018-06-18 Package: 12.1.1 (my elpa has some patches I think from git repo, but they should not = affect this) Consider this source \documentclass{article} \begin{document} % This is a comment \def\foo#1{foo} % another comment \end{document} Select the three lines delimited by the document environment Hit C-cC-e verbatim Result: \documentclass{article} \begin{document} % \begin{verbatim} % This is a comment \def\foo#1{foo} % another comment % \end{verbatim} % \end{document} Regards, Jean-Fran=E7ois= From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 10:48:40 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2019 14:48:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hG2uW-0000bJ-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:48:40 -0400 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:52312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hG2uT-0000b8-Ou for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:48:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (210-20-200-15.rev.home.ne.jp [210.20.200.15]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D711DA2; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:48:34 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to jfbu message dated "Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:11:23 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <44215.1555339713.1@localhost> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:48:34 +0900 Message-ID: <44216.1555339714@localhost> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: 35284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Jean, Please consider customizing the option `LaTeX-insert-into-comments'. You will get \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \begin{verbatim} % This is a comment \def\foo#1{foo} % another comment \end{verbatim} \end{document} after the option is set to nil. Regards, Ikumi Keita >>>>> jfbu writes: > Consider this source > \documentclass{article} > \begin{document} > % This is a comment > \def\foo#1{foo} > % another comment > \end{document} > Select the three lines delimited by the document environment > Hit C-cC-e verbatim > Result: > \documentclass{article} > \begin{document} > % \begin{verbatim} > % This is a comment > \def\foo#1{foo} > % another comment > % \end{verbatim} > % \end{document} From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 10:57:16 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2019 14:57:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35224 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hG32q-0000oy-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:57:16 -0400 Received: from smtp6.tech.numericable.fr ([82.216.111.42]:38594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hG32o-0000op-8a for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:57:15 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (13.135.3.93.rev.sfr.net [93.3.135.13]) by smtp6.tech.numericable.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1AB9181E04; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:57:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out From: jfbu In-Reply-To: <44216.1555339714@localhost> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:57:09 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <44216.1555339714@localhost> To: Ikumi Keita X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrvdelgdekvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfpfgfogfftkfevteeunffgpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddunecuhfhrohhmpehjfhgsuhcuoehjfhgsuhesfhhrvggvrdhfrheqnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: 35284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Keita, Thanks. But isn't there a bug even for the use case one wants the verbatim to be = inserted inside the comment? (which wasn't my case) Look at commented out last line, and at the added blank line. \documentclass{article} \begin{document} % \begin{verbatim} % This is a comment \def\foo#1{foo} % another comment % \end{verbatim} % \end{document} To be more precise I type C-cC-e and then verbatim and Return after having selected with the mouse 3 lines, and the cursor blinks at = start of \end{document} Best, Jean-Fran=E7ois Le 15 avr. 2019 =E0 16:48, Ikumi Keita a =E9crit : > Hi Jean, >=20 > Please consider customizing the option `LaTeX-insert-into-comments'. > You will get > \documentclass{article} >=20 > \begin{document} > \begin{verbatim} > % This is a comment > \def\foo#1{foo} > % another comment > \end{verbatim} > \end{document} > after the option is set to nil. >=20 > Regards, > Ikumi Keita >=20 >>>>>> jfbu writes: >> Consider this source >=20 >> \documentclass{article} >=20 >> \begin{document} >> % This is a comment >> \def\foo#1{foo} >> % another comment >> \end{document} >=20 >> Select the three lines delimited by the document environment >=20 >> Hit C-cC-e verbatim >=20 >> Result: >=20 >> \documentclass{article} >=20 >> \begin{document} >> % \begin{verbatim} >> % This is a comment >> \def\foo#1{foo} >> % another comment >=20 >> % \end{verbatim} >> % \end{document} From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 16 08:47:32 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2019 12:47:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGNUq-00050V-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:47:32 -0400 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:44852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGNUn-00050H-Nt for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:47:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (210-20-200-15.rev.home.ne.jp [210.20.200.15]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 58BD296; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:47:26 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out In-reply-to: References: <44216.1555339714@localhost> Comments: In-reply-to jfbu message dated "Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:57:09 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:47:19 +0900 Message-ID: <46602.1555418839@localhost> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: 35284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Jean, >>>>> jfbu writes: > But isn't there a bug even for the use case one wants the verbatim to > be inserted inside the comment? > (which wasn't my case) > Look at commented out last line, and at the added blank line. > \documentclass{article} > \begin{document} > % \begin{verbatim} > % This is a comment > \def\foo#1{foo} > % another comment > % \end{verbatim} > % \end{document} Thanks for your comments. I agree that the current behavior is not totally satisfactory, and expect the attatched patch would crudely resolve this particular issue. However, the relevant codes must be involved in a lot, lot of different cases, so it might not be valid for some other cases. I'm not sure currently. Regards, Ikumi Keita --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch-insert-environment Content-Description: patch diff --git a/latex.el b/latex.el index 898eec8d..58bf6157 100644 --- a/latex.el +++ b/latex.el @@ -699,6 +699,9 @@ environment just inserted, the buffer position just before (newline) (beginning-of-line 0)) (t + (when (bolp) + (backward-char 1) + (set-marker (mark-marker) (point))) (delete-horizontal-space) (insert-before-markers "\n") (newline) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 16 08:56:53 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2019 12:56:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGNdt-0005Dj-1U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:56:53 -0400 Received: from smtp7.tech.numericable.fr ([82.216.111.43]:46794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGNdq-0005Da-O2 for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:56:51 -0400 Received: from Ordinateur-Burnolien.local (13.135.3.93.rev.sfr.net [93.3.135.13]) by smtp7.tech.numericable.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9895C628E2; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:56:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out To: Ikumi Keita References: <44216.1555339714@localhost> <46602.1555418839@localhost> From: JF Message-ID: <7184999f-d580-6ce2-24e9-59e4ce04ed63@free.fr> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:56:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46602.1555418839@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfedugdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfpfgfogfftkfevteeunffgpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflhfcuoehjfhgsuhesfhhrvggvrdhfrheqnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: 35284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Keita, Le 16/04/2019 à 14:47, Ikumi Keita a écrit : > Hi Jean, > >>>>>> jfbu writes: >> But isn't there a bug even for the use case one wants the verbatim to >> be inserted inside the comment? >> (which wasn't my case) >> Look at commented out last line, and at the added blank line. >> \documentclass{article} >> \begin{document} >> % \begin{verbatim} >> % This is a comment >> \def\foo#1{foo} >> % another comment >> % \end{verbatim} >> % \end{document} > Thanks for your comments. I agree that the current behavior is not > totally satisfactory, and expect the attatched patch would crudely > resolve this particular issue. However, the relevant codes must be > involved in a lot, lot of different cases, so it might not be valid for > some other cases. I'm not sure currently. I have added the patch to my current auctex 12.1.1 and it does improve the situation. as it produces \begin{document} % \begin{verbatim} % This is a comment \def\foo#1{foo} % another comment % \end{verbatim} % \end{document} which avoids a blank line insertion and does not comment out the next line (which here is the \end{document} one) Best, Jean-François > Regards, > Ikumi Keita > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 16 09:01:21 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2019 13:01:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGNiD-0005M2-07 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:01:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:43244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGNiB-0005Ll-ON for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:01:20 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k17so22261717wrx.10 for <35284@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jdUYN1mi1eHeNdNdAqbr4MyvKm1rn69KVHLPOuUs1Hw=; b=IpERiiAmW5hUQO1tN534D5mRfIZ/k0B2P9hkiN0q1SP/XFLpJ6WbyfQB0L0oxUJZ0F +iXKzSPBCsJGfgEYmxSFFY3gsVEUNo0ipNHjbqDWf3fjL8D3IiDNRgl8ezWPybEp1+Nn swmdITn5SU2EVPlXwNJw3kqlP4AB4UNiDj7xyXdu/IyXirzp8ccEEtCifJX7mNBEPE7q uCiFGBf+C6bxh5e+pX77opRSetVaioCIL+5RsyKMmHF5nB3nJPM088XOMxDNdMmbVw/6 yssOW307Gzbf/FDkTYZU+zb/cMuGYSWKQv7pP0lYbu/Y7kuJ9cIB+fXzlDW1WFjhuuhe QR9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jdUYN1mi1eHeNdNdAqbr4MyvKm1rn69KVHLPOuUs1Hw=; b=F0WVfYk3CcgX/dZ/1WirUmm8lW6fvSaWyiJbKtrbx0a2z1oimIe/0122I/w255mJ4E 9cvih8OkU6iVBYS+z3I5kRE8fqjOKLjn5vX5lzz1VBzQMSbhOFsJoUjY9YvRi9PgT9yY Fi1TS4iqGyIfU4kmLRbjncgo1ssW1Mg/q85eAsSdPsPRA3va80hlysmwywgpEfiRcnLk 1aY3adWghDV75X0H4ctcT1GD4vxfM/3qgAAfDU1KWzM47jtW1nZKOND0QsYo0mdcXAWZ NkKHgvl3uTB+1NsSEIqeMWBfpetbyWxSADVOnECl66jLb/Cfd64D7ZVnuI5NWdD8hiFh uRhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXYlw5sW03+J68NyEA8gmWpwKcSJvY/8HXDk7ClUTrDB/1o6rz7 QvGTHayKXqxp+FjG6B4MgL0rBoX8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx5RFY9yrPSkW4LRH3xaZCZ5Q4Hxw8f7LuHGPJKq7z84+9tUmFPpePM6lNFgdHDHVpo56hrOQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa47:: with SMTP id y7mr33839894wrr.27.1555419669878; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.33.0.6] ([46.29.2.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm68396632wrx.25.2019.04.16.06.01.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out To: Ikumi Keita , jfbu References: <44216.1555339714@localhost> <46602.1555418839@localhost> From: gojjoe@gmail.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:01:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <46602.1555418839@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: 35284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Is this possibly connected with the small bug that I reported a while ago? I enclose the text of my old report: --------------------- I've noticed a little bug when auto-fill operates on a line finishing with a "%". To reproduce: 1. Activate auto-fill-mode in a tex file with LaTeX mode. 2. Set fill-column to some value; here I use 20. 3. Suppose you have a line like this: 123456789% commented 4. Now you'd like to add some more text right before the "%", eg "-1234567890 abc". Note that "123456789-1234567890" is twenty characters long, so auto-fill should automatically insert a newline as we type the space after "0". Expected result: 123456789-1234567890 abc% commented Instead I get this: 123456789-1234567890 % abccommented That is, my text has been continued *within* the comment, which wasn't my intention – Further info: A. If the text before the comment is *already longer* than auto-fill-column when I type the space, and if auto-fill can carry some previous text to the new line, then everything works correctly. For example, If I have 123456789% commented And now I type " 1234567890X abc" (note: space instead of "-") right before the "%", I get 123456789 1234567890X abc% commented as desired. B. The length of the text after "%" seems to be irrelevant for the issue. ---------------------- On 19-04-16 14:47, Ikumi Keita wrote: > Thanks for your comments. I agree that the current behavior is not > totally satisfactory, and expect the attatched patch would crudely > resolve this particular issue. However, the relevant codes must be > involved in a lot, lot of different cases, so it might not be valid for > some other cases. I'm not sure currently. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 17 02:35:15 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2019 06:35:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGeA7-0000jy-At for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:35:15 -0400 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:36138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGeA4-0000jk-NH for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:35:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (210-20-200-15.rev.home.ne.jp [210.20.200.15]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CC3FBA2; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:35:09 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: gojjoe@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out In-reply-to: References: <44216.1555339714@localhost> <46602.1555418839@localhost> Comments: In-reply-to gojjoe@gmail.com message dated "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:01:07 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2202.1555482908.1@localhost> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:35:08 +0900 Message-ID: <2203.1555482908@localhost> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: 35284@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, >>>>> gojjoe@gmail.com writes: > Is this possibly connected with the small bug that I reported a while ago? It doesn't seem so. AUCTeX does nothing special at auto fill in LaTeX mode and leave it to `do-auto-fill', the default auto fill function of emacs. It's rather complicated and would be somewhat hard to fix. Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 11:20:46 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2019 16:20:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijQRq-0003m3-8q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 11:20:46 -0500 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:45124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijQRn-0003lr-8j for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 11:20:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (210-20-192-190.rev.home.ne.jp [210.20.192.190]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C14F2A3; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 01:20:40 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: =?utf-8?Q?Denis_Bitouz=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: Empty line after an environment & bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out In-reply-to: <87h82o5l47.fsf@example.com> References: <87h82o5l47.fsf@example.com> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?Denis_Bitouz=C3=A9?= message dated "Thu, 28 Nov 2019 11:52:08 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 01:20:40 +0900 Message-ID: <7364.1577118040@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: auctex@gnu.org, 35284@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Denis, Jean, sorry for very late response. Each of you reported[1][2] about unsatisfactory results of `LaTeX-insert-environmnt' (i.e., C-c C-e) before. After taking a bit close look at the code, I came to think that the management of the positions of the point and the mark in that function is insufficient. I expect the attached patch fixes the both problems. Denis and Jean, could you please check it works on your side well? (To Jean: revert my premature patch[3] befor trying it out) Best regards, Ikumi Keita [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex/2019-11/msg00009.html [2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35284 [3] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35284#14 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=fix-for-LaTeX-insert-environment Content-Description: fix position management diff --git a/latex.el b/latex.el index aaa4a1f8..a877b510 100644 --- a/latex.el +++ b/latex.el @@ -668,41 +668,91 @@ environment just inserted, the buffer position just before (concat "^\\([ \t]*" TeX-comment-start-regexp "+\\)+[ \t]*")) (setq prefix (match-string 0)))) ;; What to do with the line containing point. - (cond ((save-excursion (beginning-of-line) + ;; - Open a new empty line for later insertion of "\begin{foo}" and + ;; put the point there. + ;; - If there were at first any non-whitespace texts between the + ;; point and EOL, send them into their new own line with possible + ;; comment prefix. + (cond (;; When the entire line consists of whitespaces except + ;; possible prefix... + (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (looking-at (concat prefix "[ \t]*$"))) + ;; ...make the line empty and put the point there. (delete-region (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0))) - ((TeX-looking-at-backward (concat "^" prefix "[ \t]*") + (;; When there are only whitespaces except possible prefix + ;; between the point and BOL (including the case the mark + ;; is at BOL)... + (TeX-looking-at-backward (if prefix + (concat "^\\(" prefix "\\)?[ \t]*") + "^[ \t]*") (line-beginning-position)) + ;; ...in this case, we have non-whitespace texts between + ;; the point and EOL, so send the entire line into a new + ;; next line and put the point on the empty line just + ;; created. (beginning-of-line) (newline) (beginning-of-line 0)) - ((bolp) + (;; In all other cases... + t + ;; ...insert a new empty line after deleting all + ;; whitespaces around the point, put the point there... (delete-horizontal-space) - (newline) - (beginning-of-line 0)) - (t - (delete-horizontal-space) - (newline 2) - (when prefix (insert prefix)) - (beginning-of-line 0))) + (if (eolp) + (newline) + ;; ...and if there were at first any non-whitespace texts + ;; between (the original position of) the point and EOL, + ;; send them into a new next line with possible comment + ;; prefix. + (newline 2) + (when prefix (insert prefix)) + (beginning-of-line 0)))) ;; What to do with the line containing mark. + ;; If there is active region... (when active-mark + ;; - Open a new empty line for later insertion of "\end{foo}" + ;; and put the mark there. + ;; - If there were at first any non-whitespace texts between the + ;; mark and EOL, pass them over the empty line and put them on + ;; their own line with possible comment prefix. (save-excursion (goto-char (mark)) - (cond ((save-excursion (beginning-of-line) - (or (looking-at (concat prefix "[ \t]*$")) - (looking-at "[ \t]*$"))) + (cond (;; When the entire line consists of whitespaces except + ;; possible prefix... + (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) + (looking-at + (if prefix + (concat "\\(" prefix "\\)?[ \t]*$") + "[ \t]*$"))) + ;; ...make the line empty and put the mark there. (delete-region (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0))) - ((TeX-looking-at-backward (concat "^" prefix "[ \t]*") + (;; When there are only whitespaces except possible prefix + ;; between the mark and BOL (including the case the mark + ;; is at BOL)... + (TeX-looking-at-backward (if prefix + (concat "^\\(" prefix "\\)?[ \t]*") + "^[ \t]*") (line-beginning-position)) + ;; ...in this case, we have non-whitespace texts + ;; between the mark and EOL, so send the entire line + ;; into a new next line and put the mark on the empty + ;; line just created. (beginning-of-line) - (newline) - (beginning-of-line 0)) - (t + (set-mark (point)) + (newline)) + (;; In all other cases... + t + ;; ...make a new empty line after deleting all + ;; whitespaces around the mark, put the mark there... (delete-horizontal-space) (insert-before-markers "\n") - (newline) - (when prefix (insert prefix)))))) + ;; ...and if there were at first any non-whitespace + ;; texts between (the original position of) the mark + ;; and EOL, send them into a new next line with + ;; possible comment prefix. + (unless (eolp) + (newline) + (when prefix (insert prefix))))))) ;; Now insert the environment. (when prefix (insert prefix)) (setq env-start (point)) --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 24 11:13:27 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2019 16:13:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijmoI-0000R3-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:13:26 -0500 Received: from zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr ([195.220.130.147]:46668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijmoF-0000Qs-Oc for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:13:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D95A135B33; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:22 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=univ-littoral.fr Received: from zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id sCr-8thjRAMj; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AB91360CB; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr 00AB91360CB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=univ-littoral.fr; s=08AB4CC0-EC74-11E6-899C-5B0ECAA5E567; t=1577204002; bh=mxHUq8UEVMqMwmRMFji1PBUuYQBJAc9+xAkC15GCgDM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wHClPJL2KGsPC+OhjYrNbfP22/h0a21GdGBMFycB6Dx24+jEUpCalRfyrp+PHKC0L abTtLEajCjsbfEkF0nfoEZZa2MygIe2UjZyJf9fgQYE8ReY6O0IyCqiLWK1D4IFebc bajaTK+EiuWJQTfFX+BP+7ixdaVISj3Bp+TmwP74= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Received: from zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kXQUvV9j7HQE; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from drums-bis (flc16-h01-176-135-84-20.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr [176.135.84.20]) by zmmta1.univ-littoral.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FF06135B33; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:19 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Denis_Bitouz=C3=A9?= To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: Empty line after an environment & bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out References: <87h82o5l47.fsf@example.com> <7364.1577118040@localhost> X-Url: http://gte.univ-littoral.fr/members/dbitouze/pub/latex X-Archive: encrypt Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7364.1577118040@localhost> (Ikumi Keita's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2019 01:20:40 +0900") Message-ID: <871rstd7mo.fsf@example.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: auctex@gnu.org, Denis =?utf-8?Q?Bitouz=C3=A9?= , 35284@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le 24/12/19 =C3=A0 01h20, Ikumi Keita a =C3=A9crit : > Hi Denis, Jean, sorry for very late response. Hi Ikumi and Jean(-Fran=C3=A7ois), > Each of you reported[1][2] about unsatisfactory results of > `LaTeX-insert-environmnt' (i.e., C-c C-e) before. I wasn't aware of the Jean-Fran=C3=A7ois's bug report. Sorry for the duplicate. > After taking a bit close look at the code, I came to think that the > management of the positions of the point and the mark in that function > is insufficient. I expect the attached patch fixes the both problems. > > Denis and Jean, could you please check it works on your side well? (To > Jean: revert my premature patch[3] befor trying it out) It works nicely, many thanks! Best regards. --=20 Denis From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 25 10:15:05 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2019 15:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54594 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ik8NM-0002Ba-UX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 10:15:05 -0500 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:58350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ik8NK-0002As-GQ for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 10:15:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (210-20-192-190.rev.home.ne.jp [210.20.192.190]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3989BB0; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:15:00 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: =?utf-8?Q?Denis_Bitouz=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: Empty line after an environment & bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out In-reply-to: <871rstd7mo.fsf@example.com> References: <87h82o5l47.fsf@example.com> <7364.1577118040@localhost> <871rstd7mo.fsf@example.com> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?Denis_Bitouz=C3=A9?= message dated "Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:13:19 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:14:59 +0900 Message-ID: <15558.1577286899@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: auctex@gnu.org, 35284@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> Denis Bitouz=E9 writes: > I wasn't aware of the Jean-Fran=E7ois's bug report. Sorry for the > duplicate. No problem :-). >> Denis and Jean, could you please check it works on your side well? (To >> Jean: revert my premature patch[3] befor trying it out) > It works nicely, many thanks! Thank you for confirmation. I'll wait for Jean's response. Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 30 21:50:17 2019 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2019 02:50:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1im7bt-0002LP-Ht for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:50:17 -0500 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:58176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1im7bq-0002LD-SB for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:50:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (p217215-ipngn2701yosida.nagano.ocn.ne.jp [180.39.169.215]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 729D074; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:50:12 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: auctex@gnu.org Subject: Re: Empty line after an environment & bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out In-reply-to: <15558.1577286899@localhost> References: <87h82o5l47.fsf@example.com> <7364.1577118040@localhost> <871rstd7mo.fsf@example.com> <15558.1577286899@localhost> Comments: In-reply-to Ikumi Keita message dated "Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:14:59 +0900." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11067.1577760611.1@localhost> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:50:12 +0900 Message-ID: <11070.1577760612@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Denis_Bitouz=C3=A9?= , 35284@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi all, >>>>> Ikumi Keita writes: >>> Denis and Jean, could you please check it works on your side well? (To >>> Jean: revert my premature patch[3] befor trying it out) >> It works nicely, many thanks! > Thank you for confirmation. I'll wait for Jean's response. Though I haven't heard from Jean yet, I committed the fix to the git repo with regression test. Please let me know if it causes any bad side effect. Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 01 18:26:57 2020 Received: (at 35284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2020 23:26:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imnOD-0004Pg-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 18:26:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46836) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imnOB-0004PQ-Vd for 35284@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 18:26:56 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imnO4-0007p0-Hu; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 18:26:48 -0500 Received: from pd9fb7aa0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.251.122.160]:50839 helo=MUTANT) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1imnO3-0007VC-QR; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 18:26:48 -0500 From: Arash Esbati To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#35284: Empty line after an environment & bug#35284: 12.1.1; new verbatim environment wrongly commented out References: <87h82o5l47.fsf@example.com> <7364.1577118040@localhost> <871rstd7mo.fsf@example.com> <15558.1577286899@localhost> <11070.1577760612__25549.3042337307$1577760674$gmane$org@localhost> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:25:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <11070.1577760612__25549.3042337307$1577760674$gmane$org@localhost> (Ikumi Keita's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:50:12 +0900") Message-ID: <861rsin4hr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35284 Cc: auctex@gnu.org, Denis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bitouz=E9?= , 35284@debbugs.gnu.org, jfbu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > Though I haven't heard from Jean yet, I committed the fix to the git > repo with regression test. Please let me know if it causes any bad > side effect. many thanks for fixing this issue. Can you please also add an entry to changes.texi? This is a user visible change and we should mention it. TIA. Best, Arash From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 07 07:10:46 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2020 12:10:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ionh8-0000d5-2I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 07:10:46 -0500 Received: from smtp1.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:50270) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ionh5-0000cv-Ul for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 07:10:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (210-20-200-113.rev.home.ne.jp [210.20.200.113]) by smtp1.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 53D39A6 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:10:41 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #35284 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:10:41 +0900 Message-ID: <6944.1578399041@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 35284 fixed close 35284 quit From unknown Thu Aug 21 14:54:05 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator