GNU bug report logs -
#35261
26.1; EBDB Documentation
Previous Next
Reported by: David Masterson <dsmasterson <at> outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 22:30:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Found in version 26.1
Done: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #38 received at 35261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> On 04/17/19 03:14 AM, David Masterson wrote:
>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>>
>>> On 04/15/19 20:56 PM, David Masterson wrote:
>>
>>>> On that, it seems that the documentation is still evolving in that
>>>> area. For instance, looking at the documentation of ebdb-field-*
>>>> variables says that they are obsolete as of 25.1 and the documentation
>>>> is relatively low, so the error above would be confusing in that you'd
>>>> wonder if you were looking at the right variable.
>>
>>> Unfortunately this doesn't have to do with EBDB, but rather with a weird
>>> interaction between the help system and EIEIO. Class names apparently
>>> once functioned as variables, but no longer do, and so Emacs complains
>>> when you try to treat one as a variable. You'll have better luck using
>>> help to look up the *function* definitions of the class names, not the
>>> variable definition.
>>
>> Ouch! That's not logical and will need some explanation somewhere. The
>> logical assumption would be that the function that is asking for input
>> is using some variable (structure) as a reference for what it expects as
>> input, so, when the error reports a name in the error, the first thought
>> would be that that is the structure to look at to get the clue as to
>> what it's looking for. It's a little confusing (to say the least) for
>> the lay person to see functions and variables with the same name.
>>
>> Something to lay out a little more as a primer in the Info docs?
>
> Mmm, I'm not really inclined to spend a lot of time explaining the
> weirdnesses of Emacs help system in the EBDB manual, but maybe a pointer
> to the function docstrings of the class symbols would be okay.
Yeah, something to point you in the right direction. Try not to make it
too 'lispy' for the newbies...
--
David
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 31 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.