GNU bug report logs - #34952
files with/out final newline look the same no matter what

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 05:09:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: fixed

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #36 received at 34952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>,
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: contovob <at> tcd.ie, 34952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: Re: bug#34952: files with/out final newline look the same no matter
 what
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:11:43 +0300
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Cc: contovob <at> tcd.ie,  34952 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  jidanni <at> jidanni.org
> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:02:31 +0200
> 
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> 
> > Oh, yeah, that makes sense.  I'll fix that.
> 
> Actually, I don't know how.  How do you ask, when you're in the
> font-lock machinery, what the original point was?  Like here:
> 
>        ,@(when (memq 'missing-newline-at-eof whitespace-active-style)
>            ;; Show missing newline.
>            `(("[^\n]\\'" 0 (if .... something) t)))))

What, calling 'point' doesn't work?  Then maybe Stefan could help us
out.

> By the way, have I whined about how difficult debugging font-lock stuff
> is?  I can't put a `debug' in there, for instance, to examine the
> calling sequence, which would probably tell me what I need to know.

I think Stefan posted some advice at some point?




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 288 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.