Subject: Re: bug#34852: 26.1; seq-intersection ignores nil as element

From: Nicolas Petton <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:45:16 +0100

Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]> writes:

Hi Michael,

> We also have `seq-some' which can be used as a contain predicate,
> e.g. to fix this bug:

Using seq-contains was wrong, and I think seq-some should have been used
instead, so I like your patch better (it's IMO better to use seq-some
used as a predicate than seq-position).

Unless somebody disagrees, I'll install your patch.

Cheers,
Nico