Subject: bug#34852: 26.1; seq-intersection ignores nil as element

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:35:08 +0100

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <[email-masked]> writes:

> My first patch makes an analogous backward-compatible change using the
> more efficient seq-position in place of seq-some.

Why is it more efficient?  The implementations are more or less
analogue, with the exception that seq-position additionally increments a
counter.

Michael.