From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Resent-From: mikadoZero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 34835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 34835@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.155242794923548 (code B ref -1); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:00:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2019 21:59:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQP-00067f-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:59:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQL-00066m-GY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:59:03 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQG-00065i-9B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:58:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQF-0001iH-40 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:58:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, SUBJ_UNNEEDED_HTML,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pGQ-0006lM-I2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:48:47 -0400 Received: from forward105p.mail.yandex.net ([2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108]:37704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pGP-0006hx-Lv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:48:46 -0400 Received: from mxback6o.mail.yandex.net (mxback6o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::20]) by forward105p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 458844D40764 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:42 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (smtp2o.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::26]) by mxback6o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 8ckCn4ftAW-ma94GZlL; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:36 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1552427316; bh=2Nd1Swcgl1vW9L9ZyhmjrRKcw0+GseZuLSG//v6Henk=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:Message-ID; b=Ptw1VX32MmkI+8D68+Y80a2swJeA/6JdWS3GwK13CJrPiN6zFwBX47tUqVyeaF8VT /ZePc7wh9FqeJ1x+cyZu8R94TVPn/Bx3W73CBv8rqgS5TmGA+2tJ+Osd2WMbbPETXT Jiv82pLf7DUQ+ixlkkmh3M46L6TwOd66g0SXf95Y= Authentication-Results: mxback6o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id BcTI0YWQ6X-mYSaGK3Z; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:35 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: mikadoZero Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:48:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) guix describe: guix 1bc24bb repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 1bc24bbf00e21a26d9eb71e5c89d941812dcdad7 which iproute: iproute not found In system.scm in the definition of %base-packages there is iproute but if I search for it there is no package with that name. Output of `guix package -s iproute`: name: iproute2 version: 4.20.0 outputs: out systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux armhf-linux aarch64-linux mips64el-linux dependencies: bdb@6.2.32 bison@3.0.5 flex@2.6.4 iptables@1.6.2 pkg-config@0.29.2 location: gnu/packages/linux.scm:1254:2 homepage: https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/iproute2 license: GPL 2+ synopsis: Utilities for controlling TCP/IP networking and traffic in Linux description: Iproute2 is a collection of utilities for controlling TCP/IP + networking and traffic with the Linux kernel. The most important of these are + `ip', which configures IPv4 and IPv6, and `tc' for traffic control. + + Most network configuration manuals still refer to ifconfig and route as the + primary network configuration tools, but ifconfig is known to behave inadequately + in modern network environments, and both should be deprecated. relevance: 6 name: ghc-iproute version: 1.7.5 outputs: out systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux dependencies: ghc-appar@0.1.4 ghc-byteorder@1.0.4 ghc-network@2.6.3.6 + ghc-safe@0.3.17 location: gnu/packages/haskell.scm:2834:2 homepage: https://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/iproute/ license: Modified BSD synopsis: IP routing table description: IP Routing Table is a tree of IP ranges to search one of them on the + longest match base. It is a kind of TRIE with one way branching removed. Both + IPv4 and IPv6 are supported. relevance: 4 From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Resent-From: Julien Lepiller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: mikadoZero ,34835@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 34835-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34835.155242872924765 (code B ref 34835); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 34835) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2019 22:12:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pd2-0006RN-TK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:12:09 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:52600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pd0-0006RB-8w for 34835@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:12:07 -0400 Received: from [100.117.87.10] (81.17.27.136 [81.17.27.136]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4d47a3f9 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:11:47 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <50BA79CA-A1C0-48A7-B42F-A4A92B94F9A4@lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le 12 mars 2019 22:48:19 GMT+01:00, mikadoZero a = =C3=A9crit : >guix describe: >guix 1bc24bb > repository URL: https://git=2Esavannah=2Egnu=2Eorg/git/guix=2Egit > branch: master > commit: 1bc24bbf00e21a26d9eb71e5c89d941812dcdad7 > >which iproute: >iproute not found > >In system=2Escm in the definition of %base-packages there is iproute but >if I search for it there is no package with that name=2E >Output of `guix package -s iproute`: > >name: iproute2 >version: 4=2E20=2E0 >outputs: out >systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux armhf-linux aarch64-linux >mips64el-linux >dependencies: bdb@6=2E2=2E32 bison@3=2E0=2E5 flex@2=2E6=2E4 iptables@1=2E= 6=2E2 >pkg-config@0=2E29=2E2 >location: gnu/packages/linux=2Escm:1254:2 >homepage: https://wiki=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg/networking/iproute2 >license: GPL 2+ >synopsis: Utilities for controlling TCP/IP networking and traffic in >Linux =20 >description: Iproute2 is a collection of utilities for controlling >TCP/IP >+ networking and traffic with the Linux kernel=2E The most important of >these are >+ `ip', which configures IPv4 and IPv6, and `tc' for traffic control=2E >+=20 >+ Most network configuration manuals still refer to ifconfig and route >as the >+ primary network configuration tools, but ifconfig is known to behave >inadequately >+ in modern network environments, and both should be deprecated=2E >relevance: 6 > >name: ghc-iproute >version: 1=2E7=2E5 >outputs: out >systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux >dependencies: ghc-appar@0=2E1=2E4 ghc-byteorder@1=2E0=2E4 ghc-network@2= =2E6=2E3=2E6 >+ ghc-safe@0=2E3=2E17 >location: gnu/packages/haskell=2Escm:2834:2 >homepage: https://www=2Emew=2Eorg/~kazu/proj/iproute/ >license: Modified BSD >synopsis: IP routing table =20 >description: IP Routing Table is a tree of IP ranges to search one of >them on the >+ longest match base=2E It is a kind of TRIE with one way branching >removed=2E Both >+ IPv4 and IPv6 are supported=2E >relevance: 4 iproute2 provides the "ip" command=2E Try "ip a" for instance to list your= devices and addresses=2E Does it work? From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: mikadoZero Subject: bug#34835: closed (Re: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package) Message-ID: References: <20190312221412.GA14844@jasmine.lan> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 34835 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 34835@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:15:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1552428902-25054-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1552428902-25054-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 34835@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 34835: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D34835 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1552428902-25054-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 34835-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2019 22:14:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pfP-0006VM-GL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:14:35 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:51911) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pfM-0006V8-Uc for 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:14:34 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752D422625; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:14:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:14:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=sG3qx/UMMXRBSCXCiH1te8X2 6hj5r8XYCYK9SDwOCwo=; b=TmxqLPCOcU5nYJDrfZiUMQmWQ4dEQzGjd4sQbOKB 1hIUXkFSB5HVhnQAeczY0XoI9waCcnEb4g9Ow8YDocIGs13Q4CLK+m7esPtSSyYD +QkB+vWLseZeBjB2T2E+T1RgMjEgMui0/wAjHYCjnE/0LqOQdfMCyGHFPw93Wo+H E6A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=sG3qx/ UMMXRBSCXCiH1te8X26hj5r8XYCYK9SDwOCwo=; b=uJqCJ+B7sPzkZK70O3fWxS XB8hhKzcAL2eAuk0EgIgTd9zYjt94Mg5qX1eEuGKO9UlB7RBQw1uBNS1UazG6bAh TeMd8zIK0AAVHZbK7Pyaxqk75dLNxoumXjfUh/UYaQk+SmzXTkNTki7dFM+kEHHH AdS0U1smABT2mipLvaDRDcLvXpN6MCqcL7CziD/AJyNFzje31798wimIZDu2uLij xUwQSRNGmnkkthdfiCe9kwYrSuuZfkxS0W39Q883X2FrzBqEyhwtmOZIzD9eUhHA rqd7rAupkcGKofIOZn55eEa4p//3nM/rqiaJq+YkHa6v8pc7h5xKUsB3GRfDhWSw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrgeekgdduieefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehgtd erredtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucfkphepjeeirdduvdegrddvtddvrddufeejnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9BB351030F; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:14:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:14:12 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: mikadoZero Subject: Re: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Message-ID: <20190312221412.GA14844@jasmine.lan> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34835-done Cc: 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 05:48:19PM -0400, mikadoZero wrote: > In system.scm in the definition of %base-packages there is iproute but > if I search for it there is no package with that name. The package is named 'iproute2' but the Scheme variable, which is what %base-packages is a list of, is named 'iproute'. --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlyILzQACgkQJkb6MLrK fwh8uRAAjnfRfTEp1tQwrfQNmOHgJrA3Q4MyVegrmXjCawCn9h9ZG+Prx5FhCHa1 eDdwphLX1ylb0iivOkgVCgujMJu6IKw5rvROVOXzcxeXjul+mt8co3gg7sak6z2C Bkd1aWF5uXatTO96MwAKY12/LyRJ67R5JG+YmF+E54RbaB3EIk7kz2F5uqK5U0p/ b2noq+Vrb/W4RlWb5gGtVfWS4MziWC60DUzROxqV+rBJV93sCO7O6WCP0JiT/smo fxXYlpAu9QrSpjZOw0lALU7GCIK3M1Mvwt2xK/P2SeietWnEuXC2XwuY2bTm+F2k 2HozV/jCna07TCmU49dSZcYmgiUnVHN+ir6ksI43YBhBsZIeua0rIeiEGm4oPklt A9dOS+5hM5i1RpPYuflgP9F6c6acpwjQoTUR/6fqLJLbCQo+W+wbBsU7nqGWKT9z jwOxcT/hQl+SFm6SJQ6N1MXTez3ElmRTFHRPBx0KYBSUj651r78GsCBZDmXjoHUE X9iBzOvCs9ylw6KG7u1kZCy4pdL8EM0BYFraWbU1O650rMuGhfNgXPMECk1gPEy1 srJaRtVy1cLtLC1RJBIIDVXDiXoYlNtvdZiKPQLCXtEplF/ByuwIPTdjM23DbKQV I6AhfPVqyGk+yVMoMOjPYhDDn9/FltZEnnIwtwAYmeGX7o0qkhs= =Ma6a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- ------------=_1552428902-25054-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2019 21:59:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQP-00067f-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:59:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQL-00066m-GY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:59:03 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQG-00065i-9B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:58:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pQF-0001iH-40 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:58:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, SUBJ_UNNEEDED_HTML,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pGQ-0006lM-I2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:48:47 -0400 Received: from forward105p.mail.yandex.net ([2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108]:37704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3pGP-0006hx-Lv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:48:46 -0400 Received: from mxback6o.mail.yandex.net (mxback6o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::20]) by forward105p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 458844D40764 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:42 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (smtp2o.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::26]) by mxback6o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 8ckCn4ftAW-ma94GZlL; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:36 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1552427316; bh=2Nd1Swcgl1vW9L9ZyhmjrRKcw0+GseZuLSG//v6Henk=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:Message-ID; b=Ptw1VX32MmkI+8D68+Y80a2swJeA/6JdWS3GwK13CJrPiN6zFwBX47tUqVyeaF8VT /ZePc7wh9FqeJ1x+cyZu8R94TVPn/Bx3W73CBv8rqgS5TmGA+2tJ+Osd2WMbbPETXT Jiv82pLf7DUQ+ixlkkmh3M46L6TwOd66g0SXf95Y= Authentication-Results: mxback6o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id BcTI0YWQ6X-mYSaGK3Z; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:35 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: mikadoZero To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:48:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) guix describe: guix 1bc24bb repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 1bc24bbf00e21a26d9eb71e5c89d941812dcdad7 which iproute: iproute not found In system.scm in the definition of %base-packages there is iproute but if I search for it there is no package with that name. Output of `guix package -s iproute`: name: iproute2 version: 4.20.0 outputs: out systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux armhf-linux aarch64-linux mips64el-linux dependencies: bdb@6.2.32 bison@3.0.5 flex@2.6.4 iptables@1.6.2 pkg-config@0.29.2 location: gnu/packages/linux.scm:1254:2 homepage: https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/iproute2 license: GPL 2+ synopsis: Utilities for controlling TCP/IP networking and traffic in Linux description: Iproute2 is a collection of utilities for controlling TCP/IP + networking and traffic with the Linux kernel. The most important of these are + `ip', which configures IPv4 and IPv6, and `tc' for traffic control. + + Most network configuration manuals still refer to ifconfig and route as the + primary network configuration tools, but ifconfig is known to behave inadequately + in modern network environments, and both should be deprecated. relevance: 6 name: ghc-iproute version: 1.7.5 outputs: out systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux dependencies: ghc-appar@0.1.4 ghc-byteorder@1.0.4 ghc-network@2.6.3.6 + ghc-safe@0.3.17 location: gnu/packages/haskell.scm:2834:2 homepage: https://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/iproute/ license: Modified BSD synopsis: IP routing table description: IP Routing Table is a tree of IP ranges to search one of them on the + longest match base. It is a kind of TRIE with one way branching removed. Both + IPv4 and IPv6 are supported. relevance: 4 ------------=_1552428902-25054-1-- From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Resent-From: mikadoZero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 34835@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 34835-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34835.155243347832156 (code B ref 34835); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 34835) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2019 23:31:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3qre-0008Ma-1z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:31:18 -0400 Received: from forward102j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.243]:37236) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3qrZ-0008MH-2U for 34835@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:31:16 -0400 Received: from mxback14j.mail.yandex.net (mxback14j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::90]) by forward102j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id F008EF20737; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:31:04 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (smtp2o.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::26]) by mxback14j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id hdiMaW1iV4-V4gWNn8j; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:31:04 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1552433464; bh=vGJGEMA7cNJMwTAftRLC/hf03NGghbVVVsW/2d6hHM4=; h=In-reply-to:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References:Message-ID; b=C6l1L1P8miViWjAS3S8G29ZI69tYDdudb8/U18dNqlE/TU3yJ4eRekEWZ0WGhKAKN tQ+a3yNg42oX3lB3dxabwbJDqDzfilKbeLGAP2ECVQHFitmcycFiHDORD/Msg8vdaO rWTmAH1f/d7yVMwF6ecghFn/noVIIjsYO0JRZCV0= Authentication-Results: mxback14j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by smtp2o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id LKPAzWCujz-V3haSwar; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:31:03 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) References: <50BA79CA-A1C0-48A7-B42F-A4A92B94F9A4@lepiller.eu> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: mikadoZero In-reply-to: <50BA79CA-A1C0-48A7-B42F-A4A92B94F9A4@lepiller.eu> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:30:47 -0400 Message-ID: <8sxju0uw.fsf@yandex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Julien Lepiller writes: > iproute2 provides the "ip" command. Try "ip a" for instance to list your devices and addresses. Does it work? That works. Thank you for explaining that. From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Resent-From: mikadoZero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D34835.155243386032680 (code D ref 34835); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 34835-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2019 23:37:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3qxn-0008V2-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:37:40 -0400 Received: from forward106p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.109]:42279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3qxl-0008Un-Rf for 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:37:38 -0400 Received: from mxback15o.mail.yandex.net (mxback15o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::66]) by forward106p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id ED5661C80D58; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:37:30 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp4j.mail.yandex.net (smtp4j.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1619::15:6]) by mxback15o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 817gNjYcvP-bT5iY8dm; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:37:30 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1552433850; bh=XQfqpULjxOKsVh/b5eem8Sc8OThw3iX+fBfMREQXxzo=; h=In-reply-to:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References:Message-ID; b=aXyVj3wfRV1S09VjvlNFWheBCHYWIEcLBG5ndRekONGeCTQWwbPLne6KI2L2fQTJQ rM1mlK1h5qWcyHXR7F1y91CbT3sKH/QMHkDIQ3dQR51ooLcd5yZ/vDXouYi4b+c+WC wRSyLlE9bQteSrN1IqYaBFnkmLuccdoGia0F1X8E= Authentication-Results: mxback15o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by smtp4j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 61ysNyHuOi-bSIaJYv6; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:37:28 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) References: <20190312221412.GA14844@jasmine.lan> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: mikadoZero In-reply-to: <20190312221412.GA14844@jasmine.lan> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:37:12 -0400 Message-ID: <7ed3u0k7.fsf@yandex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Leo Famulari writes: > The package is named 'iproute2' but the Scheme variable, which is what > %base-packages is a list of, is named 'iproute'. Thank you for the clarification. Is it common for the Scheme variable to be different from the package name? What benefit is there to it being different compared to it being the same? From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: mikadoZero Cc: 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D34835.15524707803573 (code D ref 34835); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 34835-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2019 09:53:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h40ZI-0000vY-5e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 05:53:00 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21148) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h40ZF-0000vP-5E for 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 05:52:58 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552469857; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=eWZytk3Dq3kUsUSQrYHXMfI9oogHHN5ADdgdpYKCPnA4TwJMoWLeNsNXWLOMnRSEuuIHlZbu6TJPrUs53LvGUZR1PclDnPIqZtqc8TCfrkK8oTbaFlYk7QSPGxX64EoJON5hlDQrN+HVijHxMAA7e8bsdB7r1ZsQI+N4H7UhrI0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1552469857; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=mnGaCTZZzScraFIJOZCvOiaqcB9ZtFtPlD+DXPaQ7BA=; b=Ech8OGz8Op70VXE0nRp/NXAcxQCIsBpQVSjOk0TwBPF+MP7Si1ijBF5jP0Yaz2D2GOiXw/Mbsq+IVZ5CbtievBma4HAX5KWzq9lbf1dqqo6uYddOqsJ/6g5dlA8XimdlKW2fz3zyI8MGviU8BDlHeuVNHtHhOA40dgr7Y7ophCo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1552469857; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=367; bh=mnGaCTZZzScraFIJOZCvOiaqcB9ZtFtPlD+DXPaQ7BA=; b=NA4qmSEQJjxRaNryhn1f6qDa73VrYHpxW9fE9IssYFO7TwhTRAH5JDWNYC3e4CH2 DW6OhFNw4M1EtEJooJSIgJTEdTpsRwS4E/FbO5aPC9uJzTjcfu+JLF4ToWXVWUV1jBD 83GJk5j23k8+6yXEw2QX2DDp3YxCkBiq0BUfX21g= Received: from localhost (p54AD4DAD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.77.173]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1552469854647855.0558687769702; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:37:34 -0700 (PDT) References: <20190312221412.GA14844@jasmine.lan> <7ed3u0k7.fsf@yandex.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <7ed3u0k7.fsf@yandex.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:37:30 +0100 Message-ID: <878sxj5d45.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) mikadoZero writes: > Is it common for the Scheme variable to be different from the package > name? What benefit is there to it being different compared to it being > the same? It is not very common, but sometimes it is necessary (in the case of =E2=80=9Cgnu-gettext=E2=80=9D), and sometimes it is merely convenient. -- Ricardo From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:07:18 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package Resent-From: mikadoZero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D34835.155248350531969 (code D ref 34835); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 34835-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2019 13:25:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h43sW-0008JY-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:25:05 -0400 Received: from forward101p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.101]:54706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h43sS-0008J0-T1 for 34835-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:25:02 -0400 Received: from mxback15j.mail.yandex.net (mxback15j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::91]) by forward101p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BDAD63281154; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:24:53 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (smtp1o.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::25]) by mxback15j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id xFxdn5Se8u-Orr8YxWK; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:24:53 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1552483493; bh=dXiy3wxAl/vsCqwOjl4fq04Sfj8PZ6W+/ZYIPZy80Aw=; h=In-reply-to:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References:Message-ID; b=nFwkeeSf1wElXONMysqgwUZZa01OOT3Qbi23MjUg/trLUBJALNoU0jZVF/IBcDmG8 HXsj2GfpFe1unv6g+Hd/fXVs9lfRGj2/wLx/aC2MhibXL9LH3iF3vcgdjB/9+LKYHG qd54MzpJS5Hq363ePSK9qXPyzefi0MCL5sj0eVB4= Authentication-Results: mxback15j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by smtp1o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id vy2k7Wvjpj-OpXScsb4; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:24:52 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) References: <20190312221412.GA14844@jasmine.lan> <7ed3u0k7.fsf@yandex.com> <878sxj5d45.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: mikadoZero In-reply-to: <878sxj5d45.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:24:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4l86ucto.fsf@yandex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Ricardo Wurmus writes: > mikadoZero writes: > >> Is it common for the Scheme variable to be different from the package >> name? What benefit is there to it being different compared to it being >> the same? > > It is not very common, but sometimes it is necessary (in the case of > =E2=80=9Cgnu-gettext=E2=80=9D), and sometimes it is merely convenient. Thanks