GNU bug report logs - #34816
25.2; dired regexp fails for filenames that begin with a space

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andrew Eggenberger <andrew <at> lakecitygraphic.com>

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 25.2

Done: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #16 received at 34816-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: Andrew Eggenberger <andrew <at> lakecitygraphic.com>, 34816-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34816: 25.2; dired regexp fails for filenames that begin
 with a space
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:42:39 +0200
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:

Hi,

>>> Trying to use dired-do-rename-regexp caused the following error:
>>>
>>> (file-error Renaming No such file or directory
>>> /Users/andrew/Public/Temp_2019/Temp_2.25.19/Tiger Pride/- 1B, Thieren,
>>> Addison.JPG /Users/andrew/Public/Temp_2019/Temp_2.25.19/Tiger
>>> Pride/Addison, Thieren.jpg)
>>>
>>> The reason for the file error is that the filename actually begins
>>> with
>>> a space character before the hyphen. It appears that the mechanism
>>> used to identify filenames within dired isn't sensitive to opening
>>> spaces.
>>
>> It isn't as simple as it looks. Often, dired uses a command like "ls -al
>> --dired". This gives precise information, where file names are located
>> in the output, and Emacs could determine also file names starting with
>> spaces.
>>
>> If this ls option isn't available, something like "ls -al" is
>> applied. From the output it isn't obvious, whether a leading space
>> belongs to a file name, or whether it is just a separator to the
>> date. One could implement heuristics (check the column other file names
>> start with), but this isn't implemented.
>>
>> If it comes to remote file names, the situation is even worse, because
>> you cannot always assume a proper ls command on the remote side.
>>
>> One alternative for you might to use ls-lisp.el. It doesn't apply "ls
>> -al", but tries to collect the needed information differently. Due to
>> this, dired might have a better idea about file names.
>
> So is the conclusion here to either use GNU ls, or otherwise ls-lisp.el?
> If so, should this bug be closed?

I would say so, yes. Closing the bug.

> Best regards,
> Stefan Kangas

Best regards, Michael.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 274 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.