GNU bug report logs -
#34776
27.0.50; Some questions about choose-completion-string-functions
Previous Next
Reported by: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 23:06:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 27.0.50
Done: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#34776: 27.0.50; Some questions about choose-completion-string-functions
which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 34776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
34776: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34776
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>
>> So never mind! But I'd still like to add something like the attached, as
>> functions following the current docstring will raise an error.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/simple.el b/lisp/simple.el
>> index d4ae5ebb1f..0274bdb459 100644
>> --- a/lisp/simple.el
>> +++ b/lisp/simple.el
>> @@ -8188,6 +8188,9 @@ choose-completion-string-functions
>> BUFFER - the buffer in which the choice should be inserted,
>> BASE-POSITION - where to insert the completion.
>>
>> +Functions should also accept and ignore a potential fourth
>> +argument, passed for backwards compatibility.
>> +
>
> Looks good to me. And it can go to emacs-26 since it's a doc fix.
Done, thanks.
Welcome back!
E
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
I'm trying to use `choose-completion-string-functions' to do some
"stuff" after the user finishes a completion, and have two questions:
1. The docstring of this variable says it is called with three
arguments, but in fact it's called with four: the fourth is passed as
nil, and is only there for backward compatibility, apparently. But
still, you can't use a function that only accepts three args. I can
provide a patch for the docstring if this is correct.
2. The code in `choose-completion-string' behaves as though the above
variable is buffer local, but it is never declared to be so. I'm not
sure if this is a bug (ie, we should be using `defvar-local'), or
whether I should be adding functions here using the (local 'SYMBOL)
convention of `add-function'. If that's the case, that's probably
also a docstring bug, as we should warn users that they'll want to
specify a local variable.
WDYT?
Eric
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 47 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.