GNU bug report logs - #34765
26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Alexander Miller <alexanderm <at> web.de>

Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 22:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Found in version 26.1

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #215 received at 34765 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
Cc: 34765 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rudalics <at> gmx.at, larsi <at> gnus.org,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, alexanderm <at> web.de
Subject: Re: bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run
 buffer-list-update-hook
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:05:15 +0200
> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
> Cc: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,  rudalics <at> gmx.at,  larsi <at> gnus.org,
>   34765 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  alexanderm <at> web.de
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 21:10:13 +0000
> 
> >> The printed label "see Current Buffer" should be displayed instead of
> >> this word, which is part of the anchor.  Is that okay?
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't see that this is an anchor.  So I think the anchor
> > should not start with a capital letter, as it reads more naturally
> > that way, I think.  And then the name should be used without
> > capitalization in the cross-references.  Obviously, this is a minor
> > nit.
> 
> I'm hesitant to change the anchor because all 37 such "Definition of..."
> anchors in the tree are capitalised, as are the printed labels of all
> their refs.
> 
> I'm happy to downcase them, but maybe this should be done wholesale in a
> separate commit?

That's okay, let's leave the anchor capitalization alone for now.

> >> The alternatives would be for Fmake_indirect_buffer to not call
> >> run_buffer_list_update_hook, or to not bother adding
> >> run_buffer_list_update_hook at all.  Do you have a preference?
> >
> > I think just having a comment there saying that make-indirect-buffer
> > calls this with NULL argument should be okay.
> 
> How's the attached?

LGTM, thanks.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 152 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.